Optimal exercise dose and modality-specific effects on lower-limb balance and functional motor performance in middle-aged and older adults with stroke: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
{"title":"Optimal exercise dose and modality-specific effects on lower-limb balance and functional motor performance in middle-aged and older adults with stroke: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yi-Ming Li, Le Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2026.2677641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of different exercise modalities on lower-limb balance and functional motor performance after stroke and to examine their nonlinear dose-response relationships to identify potentially optimal exercise doses using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus identified 54 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian random-effects dose-response network meta-analysis examined associations between total exercise dose, exercise modalities, and lower-limb balance and functional mobility after stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both lower-limb balance and functional movement outcomes showed clear nonlinear improvements with increasing total exercise doses, peaking at approximately 1,800-2,200 MET×min/week. Beyond this range, marginal benefits plateaued or declined, with greater inter-individual variability. For lower-limb balance, gains stabilized or slightly decreased past 2,200 MET×min/week. Functional movement improvements formed an early plateau at around 1,800 MET×min/week, sustained up to 2,200, then gradually diminished. Exercise modalities displayed distinct dose sensitivities: integrated aerobic training (IAT) rapidly achieved peak benefits at moderate loads, supporting early rehabilitation; motor control training (MCT) maintained stable effects over a broader range, facilitating long-term neuromuscular reinforcement; virtual reality training (VRT) showed localized peaks at low to moderate doses but exhibited increased uncertainty at higher levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that moderate weekly exercise doses may improve lower-limb balance and functional mobility after stroke, with dose-response patterns differing across exercise modalities. These findings support dose regulation and individualized exercise prescription, although further high-quality trials are needed to confirm the observed dose ranges and modality-specific effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2026.2677641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of different exercise modalities on lower-limb balance and functional motor performance after stroke and to examine their nonlinear dose-response relationships to identify potentially optimal exercise doses using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus identified 54 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian random-effects dose-response network meta-analysis examined associations between total exercise dose, exercise modalities, and lower-limb balance and functional mobility after stroke.
Results: Both lower-limb balance and functional movement outcomes showed clear nonlinear improvements with increasing total exercise doses, peaking at approximately 1,800-2,200 MET×min/week. Beyond this range, marginal benefits plateaued or declined, with greater inter-individual variability. For lower-limb balance, gains stabilized or slightly decreased past 2,200 MET×min/week. Functional movement improvements formed an early plateau at around 1,800 MET×min/week, sustained up to 2,200, then gradually diminished. Exercise modalities displayed distinct dose sensitivities: integrated aerobic training (IAT) rapidly achieved peak benefits at moderate loads, supporting early rehabilitation; motor control training (MCT) maintained stable effects over a broader range, facilitating long-term neuromuscular reinforcement; virtual reality training (VRT) showed localized peaks at low to moderate doses but exhibited increased uncertainty at higher levels.
Conclusions: This study suggests that moderate weekly exercise doses may improve lower-limb balance and functional mobility after stroke, with dose-response patterns differing across exercise modalities. These findings support dose regulation and individualized exercise prescription, although further high-quality trials are needed to confirm the observed dose ranges and modality-specific effects.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.