Abdullah Al Fahad, Jared Brown, Ali Walid Elhag, Azeezjamal Samad Lakhani, George Eckert, Marwa Baraka, Mohammad Al Hasan, Hakan Turkkahraman
{"title":"Evaluation of Autoregressive Models for Predicting Two-Dimensional Mandibular Landmark Displacement During Pubertal Growth.","authors":"Abdullah Al Fahad, Jared Brown, Ali Walid Elhag, Azeezjamal Samad Lakhani, George Eckert, Marwa Baraka, Mohammad Al Hasan, Hakan Turkkahraman","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To predict mandibular landmark displacement during pubertal growth using autoregressive models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 225 subjects with complete cephalometric radiographs from ages 10 to 18. Data were split by subject into training (180; 83 males, 97 females) and test sets (45; 21 males, 24 females). Mandibular landmarks analysed were Condylion, Gonion, Menton, Pogonion, and Point B. Radiographs were aligned using the Sella-Nasion line with Sella as the origin, and 2D coordinates for each landmark were recorded over time. An autoregressive model predicted future landmark positions. Accuracy was measured using mean absolute error and the percentage of predictions within 2 mm of true values. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations evaluated the effects of coordinate dimension, landmark type, prediction interval (1-4 years), prediction age (11-18), and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females demonstrated higher predictive accuracy than males (65% vs. 49%), by using the percentage of predictions within 2 mm of the true coordinates. Accuracy declined with longer prediction intervals: 66% (1-year), 58% (2-year), and 46% (4-year). Condylion was the most predictable landmark (71%), followed by Point B (63%) and Gonion (61%), whereas Menton was least predictable (40%). Accuracy was similar between x- and y-dimensions (58% vs. 56%). Overall predictive accuracy decreased substantially when Euclidean distance was used instead of separate coordinate-based assessments, ranging from 39% for Condylion to 18% for Menton.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autoregressive models can generate clinically meaningful short-term predictions of mandibular growth, particularly for selected landmarks and among female subjects. However, predictive performance declines over longer time intervals and varies substantially across anatomical sites, with Condylion demonstrating the highest accuracy and Menton showing the greatest variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To predict mandibular landmark displacement during pubertal growth using autoregressive models.
Materials and methods: The study included 225 subjects with complete cephalometric radiographs from ages 10 to 18. Data were split by subject into training (180; 83 males, 97 females) and test sets (45; 21 males, 24 females). Mandibular landmarks analysed were Condylion, Gonion, Menton, Pogonion, and Point B. Radiographs were aligned using the Sella-Nasion line with Sella as the origin, and 2D coordinates for each landmark were recorded over time. An autoregressive model predicted future landmark positions. Accuracy was measured using mean absolute error and the percentage of predictions within 2 mm of true values. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations evaluated the effects of coordinate dimension, landmark type, prediction interval (1-4 years), prediction age (11-18), and sex.
Results: Females demonstrated higher predictive accuracy than males (65% vs. 49%), by using the percentage of predictions within 2 mm of the true coordinates. Accuracy declined with longer prediction intervals: 66% (1-year), 58% (2-year), and 46% (4-year). Condylion was the most predictable landmark (71%), followed by Point B (63%) and Gonion (61%), whereas Menton was least predictable (40%). Accuracy was similar between x- and y-dimensions (58% vs. 56%). Overall predictive accuracy decreased substantially when Euclidean distance was used instead of separate coordinate-based assessments, ranging from 39% for Condylion to 18% for Menton.
Conclusions: Autoregressive models can generate clinically meaningful short-term predictions of mandibular growth, particularly for selected landmarks and among female subjects. However, predictive performance declines over longer time intervals and varies substantially across anatomical sites, with Condylion demonstrating the highest accuracy and Menton showing the greatest variability.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.