Assessing the taxonomic status of an opecoelid trematode from the evileye blaasop, Amblyrhynchote honckenii (Bloch), in South Africa.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Linda de Klerk, Russell Q-Y Yong, Bjoern C Schaeffner, Kerry A Hadfield, Nico J Smit
{"title":"Assessing the taxonomic status of an opecoelid trematode from the evileye blaasop, Amblyrhynchote honckenii (Bloch), in South Africa.","authors":"Linda de Klerk, Russell Q-Y Yong, Bjoern C Schaeffner, Kerry A Hadfield, Nico J Smit","doi":"10.1007/s00436-026-08665-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The taxonomic status of Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus (Ozaki 1935) Yamaguti 1959 (Opecoelidae: subfamily Opistholebetinae) has been a subject of taxonomic confusion since its initial description by Ozaki in 1935 as Opistholebes cotylophorus Ozaki 1935 from diodontid fish in Japan. The species' current recognised classification dates back to Yamaguti's reclassification of O. cotylophorus as Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus; however, doubts persist regarding this classification and the validity of this species. The species was reported by Bray in 1986 from off the coast of South Africa, based on a single specimen infecting the evileye blaasop, Amblyrhynchote honckenii (Bloch) (Tetraodontidae). However, recently, this report from the South African coastline was considered doubtful. Parasitological assessments of South African marine fishes provided the opportunity to recollect this taxon from the same host species reported by Bray, allowing a reassessment of its taxonomic status. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses, incorporating ITS2 and 28S rDNA, as well as cox1 and nad1 mtDNA sequence data, support the identification of the South African material as Opistholebes cf. amplicoelus; demonstrating both the value of molecular approaches in the identification and classification of marine parasites and the need for additional life-cycle data to fully resolve species boundaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19968,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13388654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-026-08665-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The taxonomic status of Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus (Ozaki 1935) Yamaguti 1959 (Opecoelidae: subfamily Opistholebetinae) has been a subject of taxonomic confusion since its initial description by Ozaki in 1935 as Opistholebes cotylophorus Ozaki 1935 from diodontid fish in Japan. The species' current recognised classification dates back to Yamaguti's reclassification of O. cotylophorus as Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus; however, doubts persist regarding this classification and the validity of this species. The species was reported by Bray in 1986 from off the coast of South Africa, based on a single specimen infecting the evileye blaasop, Amblyrhynchote honckenii (Bloch) (Tetraodontidae). However, recently, this report from the South African coastline was considered doubtful. Parasitological assessments of South African marine fishes provided the opportunity to recollect this taxon from the same host species reported by Bray, allowing a reassessment of its taxonomic status. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses, incorporating ITS2 and 28S rDNA, as well as cox1 and nad1 mtDNA sequence data, support the identification of the South African material as Opistholebes cf. amplicoelus; demonstrating both the value of molecular approaches in the identification and classification of marine parasites and the need for additional life-cycle data to fully resolve species boundaries.

评估一种来自南非黑眼虫(Amblyrhynchote honckenii (Bloch))的卵形吸虫的分类地位。
自1935年Ozaki首次将Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus (Ozaki 1935)描述为oistholephorus Ozaki 1935以来,对Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus (Ozaki 1935)的分类地位一直存在争议。该物种目前公认的分类可以追溯到Yamaguti将O. cotylophorus重新分类为Pseudoheterolebes cotylophorus;然而,对这种分类和该物种的有效性的质疑仍然存在。该物种是由Bray于1986年在南非海岸报道的,基于一个感染了恶眼blaasop的单一标本,Amblyrhynchote honckenii (Bloch) (Tetraodontidae)。然而,最近,这份来自南非海岸线的报告被认为是可疑的。南非海洋鱼类的寄生虫学评估提供了从Bray报告的同一宿主物种中重新收集该分类单元的机会,从而可以重新评估其分类地位。形态学和分子系统发育分析,包括ITS2和28S rDNA,以及cox1和nad1 mtDNA序列数据,支持鉴定南非材料为Opistholebes cf. amplicoelus;证明了分子方法在海洋寄生虫鉴定和分类中的价值,以及需要更多的生命周期数据来充分解决物种边界问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology Research
Parasitology Research 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal Parasitology Research covers the latest developments in parasitology across a variety of disciplines, including biology, medicine and veterinary medicine. Among many topics discussed are chemotherapy and control of parasitic disease, and the relationship of host and parasite. Other coverage includes: Protozoology, Helminthology, Entomology; Morphology (incl. Pathomorphology, Ultrastructure); Biochemistry, Physiology including Pathophysiology; Parasite-Host-Relationships including Immunology and Host Specificity; life history, ecology and epidemiology; and Diagnosis, Chemotherapy and Control of Parasitic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书