Management Patterns, Outcomes, and Timing Differences in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment: A Retrospective Review at a Single Institution from 2019-2024.

IF 1.6 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2026-05-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.161823
Christopher Eduard Lingat, Usama N Ismail, Gaurang M Amonkar, Derek S Anderson, Alexander Chueh, Sajan Goyal, Timothy T Huang, Justin Kim, Laya P Krishnan, Tyler B Nofzinger, Royal Shrestha, Mark Shima
{"title":"Management Patterns, Outcomes, and Timing Differences in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment: A Retrospective Review at a Single Institution from 2019-2024.","authors":"Christopher Eduard Lingat, Usama N Ismail, Gaurang M Amonkar, Derek S Anderson, Alexander Chueh, Sajan Goyal, Timothy T Huang, Justin Kim, Laya P Krishnan, Tyler B Nofzinger, Royal Shrestha, Mark Shima","doi":"10.52965/001c.161823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy that may be managed with conservative therapies and/or surgical decompression. Although both strategies are routinely used, limited data exists on how management patterns evolve within individual healthcare systems over time. This study examined trends in CTS treatment utilization, timing to surgery, and patient outcomes over a five-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with CTS at the Carle Health System between September 1st, 2019 and September 1st, 2024 was conducted. Eligible records were identified through the electronic medical record and manually reviewed. Data collected included non-surgical and surgical treatments used, symptom improvement, follow-up completion, and timing intervals for injections and carpal tunnel release (CTR). Descriptive statistics were generated, and Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore annual differences. All inferential analysis were considered exploratory due to small sample size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 516 identified patients, 62 met inclusion criteria. Across the study period, the proportion of patients receiving wrist splinting (43-73%) and CTR (43-73%) remained relatively stable, with CTR performed in 60% of patients overall. Management pathway distributions, non-surgical only (27%), surgical only (13%), both (47%), or no treatment (13%), did not differ significantly across years (p >0.05). Among patients receiving injections, 70% reported symptom improvement, while postoperative CTR cure rate was found to be 95%. CTR follow-up was completed in 73% of surgical patients. Median time from diagnosis to injection was 289 days, from diagnosis to CTR was 143 days, and from surgery to follow-up was 13 days, with no significant temporal differences (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTS management patterns at the Carle Health System have remained consistent from 2019-2024, with high rates of surgical success and variable time to intervention. Although sample size and documentation variability were limiting factors, these finding provide a baseline characterization of local practice and highlight opportunities to improve referral efficiency and postoperative follow-up. Larger studies are needed to better define the progression of CTS care trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"161823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13198905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.161823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy that may be managed with conservative therapies and/or surgical decompression. Although both strategies are routinely used, limited data exists on how management patterns evolve within individual healthcare systems over time. This study examined trends in CTS treatment utilization, timing to surgery, and patient outcomes over a five-year period.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with CTS at the Carle Health System between September 1st, 2019 and September 1st, 2024 was conducted. Eligible records were identified through the electronic medical record and manually reviewed. Data collected included non-surgical and surgical treatments used, symptom improvement, follow-up completion, and timing intervals for injections and carpal tunnel release (CTR). Descriptive statistics were generated, and Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore annual differences. All inferential analysis were considered exploratory due to small sample size.

Results: Of 516 identified patients, 62 met inclusion criteria. Across the study period, the proportion of patients receiving wrist splinting (43-73%) and CTR (43-73%) remained relatively stable, with CTR performed in 60% of patients overall. Management pathway distributions, non-surgical only (27%), surgical only (13%), both (47%), or no treatment (13%), did not differ significantly across years (p >0.05). Among patients receiving injections, 70% reported symptom improvement, while postoperative CTR cure rate was found to be 95%. CTR follow-up was completed in 73% of surgical patients. Median time from diagnosis to injection was 289 days, from diagnosis to CTR was 143 days, and from surgery to follow-up was 13 days, with no significant temporal differences (p>0.05).

Conclusions: CTS management patterns at the Carle Health System have remained consistent from 2019-2024, with high rates of surgical success and variable time to intervention. Although sample size and documentation variability were limiting factors, these finding provide a baseline characterization of local practice and highlight opportunities to improve referral efficiency and postoperative follow-up. Larger studies are needed to better define the progression of CTS care trends.

腕管综合征治疗的管理模式、结果和时间差异:2019-2024年单一机构的回顾性研究
背景:腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)是最常见的外周神经病变,可以通过保守治疗和/或手术减压来治疗。尽管这两种策略都是常规使用的,但关于管理模式如何在单个医疗保健系统中随时间演变的数据有限。这项研究调查了CTS治疗使用的趋势,手术的时机,以及患者在五年期间的结果。方法:对2019年9月1日至2024年9月1日在卡尔卫生系统诊断为CTS的成年患者进行回顾性队列研究。通过电子病历确定合格的记录并进行人工审查。收集的数据包括使用的非手术和手术治疗,症状改善,随访完成情况,注射和腕管释放(CTR)的时间间隔。产生了描述性统计数据,并使用Fisher的精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验来探索年度差异。由于样本量小,所有的推断分析都被认为是探索性的。结果:516例患者中,62例符合纳入标准。在整个研究期间,接受腕夹板的患者比例(43-73%)和CTR(43-73%)保持相对稳定,总体上60%的患者进行了CTR。管理途径分布,仅非手术(27%),仅手术(13%),两者(47%)或不治疗(13%),在各年之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。在接受注射的患者中,70%的患者报告症状改善,术后CTR治愈率为95%。73%的手术患者完成了CTR随访。从诊断到注射的中位时间为289天,从诊断到CTR的中位时间为143天,从手术到随访的中位时间为13天,时间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:Carle卫生系统的CTS管理模式从2019年到2024年保持一致,手术成功率高,干预时间可变。虽然样本量和文献可变性是限制因素,但这些发现提供了当地实践的基线特征,并突出了提高转诊效率和术后随访的机会。需要更大规模的研究来更好地定义CTS护理趋势的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书