{"title":"The Trust-Behavior Paradox in Orthopedic Care: A National Survey of Care-Seeking, Misinformation, and Non-Physician Information Sources.","authors":"Maya Lee, Latha Ganti","doi":"10.52965/001c.162078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trust in physicians remains a cornerstone of effective healthcare delivery; however, the rapid expansion of online and non-physician health information sources has introduced new challenges to patient decision-making. In orthopedic practice, delayed evaluation of musculoskeletal symptoms-particularly those concerning for malignancy-may be influenced by misinformation and alternative care pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally weighted survey of U.S. adults (n=200) to evaluate care-seeking behavior, trust in information sources, and endorsement of cancer-related misconceptions. The survey assessed willingness to delay care for persistent bone or back pain, reliance on physician versus non-physician information sources, and responses to conflicting health information. Stratified analyses were performed based on chronic pain status and prior cancer-related experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although 85% of respondents identified physicians as their most trusted source of health information, 55% reported regular use of online or social media platforms. A substantial proportion of participants reported willingness to delay care for ≥3 weeks or until symptom progression. Individuals with chronic pain demonstrated significantly higher odds of delayed care-seeking (p<0.05) and misinformation endorsement (OR 1.5-2.5, p<0.05). Reliance on online information was independently associated with delayed medical evaluation (OR ~2.0, p<0.01). Notably, a subset of respondents reported prioritizing online information over physician recommendations when conflicts arose, representing the highest-risk group for delayed care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A pronounced trust-behavior paradox exists in orthopedic care, wherein high trust in physicians does not consistently translate into timely care-seeking. Misinformation and reliance on non-physician information sources contribute to diagnostic delay, particularly among individuals with chronic pain or prior cancer-related experience. Targeted patient education and engagement in digital information spaces are critical to mitigating these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"162078"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13198897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.162078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Trust in physicians remains a cornerstone of effective healthcare delivery; however, the rapid expansion of online and non-physician health information sources has introduced new challenges to patient decision-making. In orthopedic practice, delayed evaluation of musculoskeletal symptoms-particularly those concerning for malignancy-may be influenced by misinformation and alternative care pathways.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally weighted survey of U.S. adults (n=200) to evaluate care-seeking behavior, trust in information sources, and endorsement of cancer-related misconceptions. The survey assessed willingness to delay care for persistent bone or back pain, reliance on physician versus non-physician information sources, and responses to conflicting health information. Stratified analyses were performed based on chronic pain status and prior cancer-related experience.
Results: Although 85% of respondents identified physicians as their most trusted source of health information, 55% reported regular use of online or social media platforms. A substantial proportion of participants reported willingness to delay care for ≥3 weeks or until symptom progression. Individuals with chronic pain demonstrated significantly higher odds of delayed care-seeking (p<0.05) and misinformation endorsement (OR 1.5-2.5, p<0.05). Reliance on online information was independently associated with delayed medical evaluation (OR ~2.0, p<0.01). Notably, a subset of respondents reported prioritizing online information over physician recommendations when conflicts arose, representing the highest-risk group for delayed care.
Conclusion: A pronounced trust-behavior paradox exists in orthopedic care, wherein high trust in physicians does not consistently translate into timely care-seeking. Misinformation and reliance on non-physician information sources contribute to diagnostic delay, particularly among individuals with chronic pain or prior cancer-related experience. Targeted patient education and engagement in digital information spaces are critical to mitigating these risks.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.