Comparative Evaluation of Scleral Lens Treatment in Ocular Surface Diseases: A Prospective Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-05-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/1921583
Yirui Zhu, Jiangxiong Cai, Li Su, Jilian Dong, Jie Zhou, Haohan Zheng, Yujie Mou, Xiuming Jin
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Scleral Lens Treatment in Ocular Surface Diseases: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Yirui Zhu, Jiangxiong Cai, Li Su, Jilian Dong, Jie Zhou, Haohan Zheng, Yujie Mou, Xiuming Jin","doi":"10.1155/joph/1921583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes of scleral lens wear across different ocular surface diseases, providing evidence for individualized fitting and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with keratoconus, ocular surface trauma, postkeratoplasty, and dry eye were fitted with scleral lenses using OCT-guided customization. All participants underwent baseline examinations before and after lens wear, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) assessment. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, comfort, visual clarity, handling, cleanliness, and satisfaction, were collected via a standardized questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCVA improved significantly in all groups after scleral lens wear, with the postkeratoplasty group showing the least improvement. OSDI scores decreased significantly across the groups. CCT increased after lens wear, indicating mild corneal thickening. The postkeratoplasty group exhibited significantly greater tear reservoir thickness at the superior and superonasal locations compared to the keratoconus and dry eye disease groups. Subjective ratings of handling, cleanliness, and satisfaction revealed no significant differences across the four groups. However, the trauma group reported less improvement in quality of life, and the postkeratoplasty group experienced lower comfort levels compared to the keratoconus group. Overall, 51.3% of patients reported experiencing midday fogging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scleral lenses offer effective visual rehabilitation and symptom relief across diverse ocular surface diseases, with consistently high levels of patient-reported satisfaction. Future research should focus on individualized fitting strategies, address challenges such as midday fogging, and evaluate long-term safety and efficacy to guide wider clinical applications. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06555367.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"1921583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13197798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/1921583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes of scleral lens wear across different ocular surface diseases, providing evidence for individualized fitting and management strategies.

Methods: Patients with keratoconus, ocular surface trauma, postkeratoplasty, and dry eye were fitted with scleral lenses using OCT-guided customization. All participants underwent baseline examinations before and after lens wear, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) assessment. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, comfort, visual clarity, handling, cleanliness, and satisfaction, were collected via a standardized questionnaire.

Results: BCVA improved significantly in all groups after scleral lens wear, with the postkeratoplasty group showing the least improvement. OSDI scores decreased significantly across the groups. CCT increased after lens wear, indicating mild corneal thickening. The postkeratoplasty group exhibited significantly greater tear reservoir thickness at the superior and superonasal locations compared to the keratoconus and dry eye disease groups. Subjective ratings of handling, cleanliness, and satisfaction revealed no significant differences across the four groups. However, the trauma group reported less improvement in quality of life, and the postkeratoplasty group experienced lower comfort levels compared to the keratoconus group. Overall, 51.3% of patients reported experiencing midday fogging.

Conclusions: Scleral lenses offer effective visual rehabilitation and symptom relief across diverse ocular surface diseases, with consistently high levels of patient-reported satisfaction. Future research should focus on individualized fitting strategies, address challenges such as midday fogging, and evaluate long-term safety and efficacy to guide wider clinical applications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06555367.

巩膜晶体治疗眼表疾病的比较评价:一项前瞻性研究。
目的:本研究评估不同眼表疾病的巩膜晶状体配戴的临床疗效和患者报告的结果,为个性化配戴和管理策略提供依据。方法:对圆锥角膜、眼表外伤、角膜移植术后干眼症患者采用oct引导定制巩膜晶状体植入。所有参与者在佩戴晶状体之前和之后都进行了基线检查,包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼内压(IOP)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)和眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评估。通过标准化问卷收集患者报告的结果,包括生活质量、舒适度、视觉清晰度、处理、清洁度和满意度。结果:各组巩膜晶状体佩戴后BCVA均有明显改善,角膜移植术后BCVA改善最小。OSDI评分在各组间显著下降。晶状体磨损后,CCT升高,提示角膜轻度增厚。与圆锥角膜组和干眼症组相比,角膜移植后组在鼻上和鼻上位置的泪库厚度显著增加。在处理、清洁和满意度方面的主观评分显示,四组之间没有显著差异。然而,创伤组报告的生活质量改善较少,与圆锥角膜组相比,角膜移植术后组的舒适度较低。总体而言,51.3%的患者报告说他们经历过正午起雾。结论:巩膜晶状体治疗多种眼表疾病能有效地恢复视力并缓解症状,患者报告的满意度一直很高。未来的研究应侧重于个性化的贴合策略,解决正午雾化等挑战,并评估长期安全性和有效性,以指导更广泛的临床应用。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06555367。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书