Evidence Gaps and Global Patterns in Leishmaniasis Control: A Scoping Review of Clinical, Diagnostic, and Treatment Strategies.

IF 1.7 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Journal of Parasitology Research Pub Date : 2026-05-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/japr/8882865
Muhi-Deen Wonwana Mohammed, Yussif Owusu Aboagye, Akwasi Anyanful, Samuel Kyei, Kwame Kumi Asare
{"title":"Evidence Gaps and Global Patterns in Leishmaniasis Control: A Scoping Review of Clinical, Diagnostic, and Treatment Strategies.","authors":"Muhi-Deen Wonwana Mohammed, Yussif Owusu Aboagye, Akwasi Anyanful, Samuel Kyei, Kwame Kumi Asare","doi":"10.1155/japr/8882865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease with diverse clinical forms, heterogeneous geographical distribution, and persistent diagnostic and treatment challenges. Although substantial primary research exists, evidence remains fragmented, limiting integrated and context-specific control strategies. This scoping review synthesizes global evidence on disease distribution, diagnostic performance, and treatment outcomes, and identifies critical evidence gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and January 2026. Data were synthesized narratively. A total of 118 studies were included in the review, of which 75 were analyzed to assess the geographical distribution of Leishmaniasis, while the remaining 43 studies were used to evaluate diagnostic tools and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five studies from 53 countries were included. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported in 58 studies (77.3%) and was the most geographically widespread form, whereas visceral leishmaniasis was reported in 26 studies (34.7%) and showed marked focality, particularly in East Africa, South Asia, and Brazil. Molecular diagnostics demonstrated superior performance, with PCR and qPCR sensitivities ranging from 89% to 100% and specificities from 57% to 100%, depending on target gene and sample type. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification showed sensitivities of 89.7%-95% and specificities of 63.6%-100%. In contrast, microscopy showed lower sensitivity (32.8%-80.8% for cutaneous and 44%-67% for visceral leishmaniasis) but high specificity (> 95%). Serological tests and rapid diagnostic tests performed well for visceral leishmaniasis, with rK39-based assays showing sensitivities of 78-96.4% and specificities of 93%-97%, and direct agglutination tests achieving sensitivities of 97.3%-99.1% and specificities of 97.5%-98.8%. Fewer than one-third of studies evaluated operational feasibility. Liposomal amphotericin B achieved the highest cure rates for visceral leishmaniasis, whereas antimonials remained the most frequently used treatment for cutaneous disease. Relapse was predominantly reported in visceral leishmaniasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leishmaniasis exhibits substantial global heterogeneity, with molecular diagnostics offering high analytical accuracy but limited real-world deployment. Addressing operational constraints and integrating emerging technologies are critical priorities for strengthening global leishmaniasis control. Molecular and antigen-based diagnostics offer improved accuracy but remain underutilized in resource-limited settings. Effective treatment is complicated by toxicity, cost, and relapse. Expanding diagnostic capacity, optimizing treatment protocols, and strengthening surveillance systems are critical for effective global leishmaniasis control and elimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":16662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parasitology Research","volume":"2026 ","pages":"8882865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13191776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parasitology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/japr/8882865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease with diverse clinical forms, heterogeneous geographical distribution, and persistent diagnostic and treatment challenges. Although substantial primary research exists, evidence remains fragmented, limiting integrated and context-specific control strategies. This scoping review synthesizes global evidence on disease distribution, diagnostic performance, and treatment outcomes, and identifies critical evidence gaps.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and January 2026. Data were synthesized narratively. A total of 118 studies were included in the review, of which 75 were analyzed to assess the geographical distribution of Leishmaniasis, while the remaining 43 studies were used to evaluate diagnostic tools and treatment outcomes.

Results: Seventy-five studies from 53 countries were included. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported in 58 studies (77.3%) and was the most geographically widespread form, whereas visceral leishmaniasis was reported in 26 studies (34.7%) and showed marked focality, particularly in East Africa, South Asia, and Brazil. Molecular diagnostics demonstrated superior performance, with PCR and qPCR sensitivities ranging from 89% to 100% and specificities from 57% to 100%, depending on target gene and sample type. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification showed sensitivities of 89.7%-95% and specificities of 63.6%-100%. In contrast, microscopy showed lower sensitivity (32.8%-80.8% for cutaneous and 44%-67% for visceral leishmaniasis) but high specificity (> 95%). Serological tests and rapid diagnostic tests performed well for visceral leishmaniasis, with rK39-based assays showing sensitivities of 78-96.4% and specificities of 93%-97%, and direct agglutination tests achieving sensitivities of 97.3%-99.1% and specificities of 97.5%-98.8%. Fewer than one-third of studies evaluated operational feasibility. Liposomal amphotericin B achieved the highest cure rates for visceral leishmaniasis, whereas antimonials remained the most frequently used treatment for cutaneous disease. Relapse was predominantly reported in visceral leishmaniasis.

Conclusion: Leishmaniasis exhibits substantial global heterogeneity, with molecular diagnostics offering high analytical accuracy but limited real-world deployment. Addressing operational constraints and integrating emerging technologies are critical priorities for strengthening global leishmaniasis control. Molecular and antigen-based diagnostics offer improved accuracy but remain underutilized in resource-limited settings. Effective treatment is complicated by toxicity, cost, and relapse. Expanding diagnostic capacity, optimizing treatment protocols, and strengthening surveillance systems are critical for effective global leishmaniasis control and elimination.

利什曼病控制的证据差距和全球模式:临床、诊断和治疗策略的范围审查。
背景:利什曼病是一种被忽视的热带病,临床表现多样,地理分布不均,诊断和治疗面临持续挑战。尽管存在大量的初步研究,但证据仍然是碎片化的,限制了综合和具体情况的控制策略。这一范围审查综合了关于疾病分布、诊断表现和治疗结果的全球证据,并确定了关键的证据差距。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley框架和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。在四个电子数据库中检索了2000年1月至2026年1月间发表的研究。数据以叙述的方式合成。该综述共纳入118项研究,其中75项研究用于评估利什曼病的地理分布,其余43项研究用于评估诊断工具和治疗结果。结果:纳入了来自53个国家的75项研究。58项研究报告了皮肤利什曼病(77.3%),是地理上最广泛的形式,而26项研究报告了内脏利什曼病(34.7%),并显示出明显的局灶性,特别是在东非、南亚和巴西。分子诊断表现出优异的性能,根据靶基因和样品类型,PCR和qPCR的灵敏度从89%到100%,特异性从57%到100%。环介导的等温扩增灵敏度为89.7% ~ 95%,特异性为63.6% ~ 100%。相比之下,显微镜检查显示敏感性较低(皮肤利什曼病32.8%-80.8%,内脏利什曼病44%-67%),但特异性较高(> 95%)。血清学试验和快速诊断试验对内脏利什曼病表现良好,基于rk39的检测灵敏度为78-96.4%,特异性为93%-97%,直接凝集试验灵敏度为97.3%-99.1%,特异性为91.5% -98.8%。不到三分之一的研究评估了运营可行性。脂质体两性霉素B对内脏利什曼病的治愈率最高,而抗生素仍然是皮肤疾病最常用的治疗方法。复发主要见于内脏利什曼病。结论:利什曼病表现出明显的全球异质性,分子诊断提供了较高的分析准确性,但限制了现实世界的部署。解决业务限制和整合新兴技术是加强全球利什曼病控制的关键优先事项。分子和基于抗原的诊断提高了准确性,但在资源有限的环境中仍未得到充分利用。有效的治疗因毒性、费用和复发而变得复杂。扩大诊断能力、优化治疗方案和加强监测系统对于全球有效控制和消除利什曼病至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Parasitology Research
Journal of Parasitology Research Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Parasitology Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of basic and applied parasitology. Articles covering host-parasite relationships and parasitic diseases will be considered, as well as studies on disease vectors. Articles highlighting social and economic issues around the impact of parasites are also encouraged. As an international, Open Access publication, Journal of Parasitology Research aims to foster learning and collaboration between countries and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书