Infectious and non-infectious complications associated with transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy using an alternative antibiotic regimen with oral cefixime.

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Wolff Laura, Stankovic Mladen, Mendes Joao
{"title":"Infectious and non-infectious complications associated with transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy using an alternative antibiotic regimen with oral cefixime.","authors":"Wolff Laura, Stankovic Mladen, Mendes Joao","doi":"10.1177/17571774261449132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transrectal prostate biopsy has raised concerns due to potential postbiopsy infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated infectious and non-infectious complication rates following transrectal biopsy without bowel preparation, using third-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis instead of resource-intensive targeted approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-centre retrospective study included biopsy-naïve patients undergoing MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided transrectal systematic and targeted prostate biopsies under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting. All patients received third-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis, cefixime. The primary endpoint was the 30-day infectious complication rate, including fever, genitourinary infections, additional antibiotic prescriptions, unscheduled office/emergency visits, hospitalisations, or sepsis. Secondary endpoints were non-infectious complications such as gross haematuria, rectal bleeding, or acute urinary retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 336 cases were analysed. No cases of sepsis or positive blood cultures were observed. Infectious complications were uncommon, with fever ≥38°C occurring in 10 patients (2.9%), of whom 6 (1.8%) required hospitalisation. Localised infection, limited to epididymitis, was reported in 5 patients (1.5%) and was managed with additional antibiotics. Overall, 14 patients (4.2%) required unscheduled visits due to complications. Non-infectious complications were infrequent, with haematuria requiring bladder irrigation in 3 patients (0.9%) and acute urinary retention in 2 patients (0.6%). The median pain score during the procedure was 1.8 on a standardised scale.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Transrectal prostate biopsy using third-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis was associated with low infectious and non-infectious complication rates, with no sepsis cases reported. These findings highlight the procedure's safety and effectiveness, supporting its continued clinical use without the need for intensive prophylactic measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"17571774261449132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774261449132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transrectal prostate biopsy has raised concerns due to potential postbiopsy infections.

Objective: This study evaluated infectious and non-infectious complication rates following transrectal biopsy without bowel preparation, using third-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis instead of resource-intensive targeted approaches.

Materials and methods: A single-centre retrospective study included biopsy-naïve patients undergoing MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided transrectal systematic and targeted prostate biopsies under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting. All patients received third-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis, cefixime. The primary endpoint was the 30-day infectious complication rate, including fever, genitourinary infections, additional antibiotic prescriptions, unscheduled office/emergency visits, hospitalisations, or sepsis. Secondary endpoints were non-infectious complications such as gross haematuria, rectal bleeding, or acute urinary retention.

Results: Data from 336 cases were analysed. No cases of sepsis or positive blood cultures were observed. Infectious complications were uncommon, with fever ≥38°C occurring in 10 patients (2.9%), of whom 6 (1.8%) required hospitalisation. Localised infection, limited to epididymitis, was reported in 5 patients (1.5%) and was managed with additional antibiotics. Overall, 14 patients (4.2%) required unscheduled visits due to complications. Non-infectious complications were infrequent, with haematuria requiring bladder irrigation in 3 patients (0.9%) and acute urinary retention in 2 patients (0.6%). The median pain score during the procedure was 1.8 on a standardised scale.

Discussion: Transrectal prostate biopsy using third-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis was associated with low infectious and non-infectious complication rates, with no sepsis cases reported. These findings highlight the procedure's safety and effectiveness, supporting its continued clinical use without the need for intensive prophylactic measures.

使用口服头孢克肟替代抗生素方案经直肠mri引导前列腺活检相关的感染性和非感染性并发症。
背景:经直肠前列腺活检由于潜在的活检后感染引起了人们的关注。目的:本研究评估未经肠道准备的经直肠活检后,使用第三代头孢菌素预防而不是资源密集型靶向方法的感染和非感染性并发症发生率。材料和方法:一项单中心回顾性研究纳入biopsy-naïve在门诊局部麻醉下接受mri超声引导下经直肠系统和靶向前列腺活检的患者。所有患者均接受第三代头孢菌素预防,头孢克肟。主要终点是30天感染性并发症发生率,包括发热、泌尿生殖系统感染、额外的抗生素处方、计划外的办公室/急诊就诊、住院或败血症。次要终点是非感染性并发症,如全身血尿、直肠出血或急性尿潴留。结果:对336例病例资料进行分析。未见脓毒症或血培养阳性病例。感染并发症不常见,10例(2.9%)患者出现发热≥38°C,其中6例(1.8%)需要住院治疗。局限于附睾炎的局部感染在5例(1.5%)患者中报告,并使用额外的抗生素进行治疗。总体而言,14名患者(4.2%)因并发症需要计划外就诊。非感染性并发症很少发生,血尿需要膀胱冲洗3例(0.9%),急性尿潴留2例(0.6%)。手术过程中疼痛评分中位数为1.8。讨论:使用第三代头孢菌素预防经直肠前列腺活检与低传染性和非传染性并发症相关,无脓毒症病例报告。这些发现强调了该手术的安全性和有效性,支持其在不需要强化预防措施的情况下继续在临床使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书