William D Lack, William R Ledoux, Nick Entress, William Crutcher, Scott Telfer, Eric Thorhauer
{"title":"In Vivo Assessment of Distal Femur Fracture Motion via Weightbearing CT.","authors":"William D Lack, William R Ledoux, Nick Entress, William Crutcher, Scott Telfer, Eric Thorhauer","doi":"10.1002/jor.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distal femur fractures have a significant risk of healing complications, with potentially suboptimal fracture motion. We developed an in vivo method of quantifying fracture motion to support translational research. Five men and one woman (age 48.3 ± 24.9 years; weight 79.8 ± 12.9 kg, mean ± SD) underwent non-weightbearing and weightbearing CT following plate (4) or nail (2) fixation of distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) while recording static ground reaction forces. Subject-specific models were generated, coordinate systems were established, and fragment poses were reconstructed to assess motion. Fracture motion was measurable and greater at the medial than the lateral aspects of fractures, with notable axial plane motion. Three-dimensional (3D) displacement (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) was greater at the medial than lateral fracture (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 3.5 ± 2.6 mm, p = 0.047), including mean proximal-distal displacement at the medial fracture (2.0 ± 3.0 mm) versus lateral fracture (0.8 ± 3.2 mm, p = 0.030), and mean axial plane displacement at the medial (3.5 ± 1.6 mm) versus lateral (2.6 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.009) fracture. Axial plane displacement was similar to proximal-distal displacement at the medial (p = 0.318) and lateral (p = 0.488) fracture. 3D and axial plane displacement were moderately associated with load, while proximal-distal displacement was minimally associated with load. Weightbearing magnitude only modestly explained intersubject differences in motion. This method allows exploration of relationships between fracture motion, fracture pattern, fixation, loading, and healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"44 6","pages":"e70229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Distal femur fractures have a significant risk of healing complications, with potentially suboptimal fracture motion. We developed an in vivo method of quantifying fracture motion to support translational research. Five men and one woman (age 48.3 ± 24.9 years; weight 79.8 ± 12.9 kg, mean ± SD) underwent non-weightbearing and weightbearing CT following plate (4) or nail (2) fixation of distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) while recording static ground reaction forces. Subject-specific models were generated, coordinate systems were established, and fragment poses were reconstructed to assess motion. Fracture motion was measurable and greater at the medial than the lateral aspects of fractures, with notable axial plane motion. Three-dimensional (3D) displacement (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) was greater at the medial than lateral fracture (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 3.5 ± 2.6 mm, p = 0.047), including mean proximal-distal displacement at the medial fracture (2.0 ± 3.0 mm) versus lateral fracture (0.8 ± 3.2 mm, p = 0.030), and mean axial plane displacement at the medial (3.5 ± 1.6 mm) versus lateral (2.6 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.009) fracture. Axial plane displacement was similar to proximal-distal displacement at the medial (p = 0.318) and lateral (p = 0.488) fracture. 3D and axial plane displacement were moderately associated with load, while proximal-distal displacement was minimally associated with load. Weightbearing magnitude only modestly explained intersubject differences in motion. This method allows exploration of relationships between fracture motion, fracture pattern, fixation, loading, and healing.
股骨远端骨折具有显著的愈合并发症风险,可能存在骨折运动不理想的情况。我们开发了一种体内量化骨折运动的方法来支持转化研究。5名男性和1名女性(年龄48.3±24.9岁,体重79.8±12.9 kg,平均±SD)在股骨远端骨折(AO/OTA 33)钢板(4)或钉子(2)固定后接受非负重和负重CT,同时记录静地面反作用力。生成受试者特定模型,建立坐标系,重构碎片姿态以评估运动。骨折运动是可测量的,在内侧比外侧骨折更大,有明显的轴向平面运动。三维(3D)位移(平均±标准差[SD])内侧骨折大于外侧骨折(4.4±2.6 vs 3.5±2.6 mm, p = 0.047),包括内侧骨折(2.0±3.0 mm)比外侧骨折(0.8±3.2 mm, p = 0.030)的平均近端到远端位移,以及内侧骨折(3.5±1.6 mm)比外侧骨折(2.6±1.6 mm, p = 0.009)的平均轴向平面位移。轴向面位移与内侧骨折(p = 0.318)和外侧骨折(p = 0.488)的近端-远端位移相似。三维和轴向平面位移与载荷的相关性中等,而近端和远端位移与载荷的相关性最小。负重大小只能适度地解释受试者之间的运动差异。这种方法可以探索骨折运动、骨折模式、固定、载荷和愈合之间的关系。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.