Histological evaluation of the soft tissue response to plasma-activated healing abutments: A prospective controlled clinical trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Luigi Canullo, Paolo Pesce, Ugo Covani, Virginia Cameroni, Valerio Massimo Sora, Yohei Jinno, Ugo Consolo, Paolo Savadori
{"title":"Histological evaluation of the soft tissue response to plasma-activated healing abutments: A prospective controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Luigi Canullo, Paolo Pesce, Ugo Covani, Virginia Cameroni, Valerio Massimo Sora, Yohei Jinno, Ugo Consolo, Paolo Savadori","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This prospective clinical trial aimed to histologically evaluate peri-implant soft tissue response to healing abutments treated with a vacuum plasma reactor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty bone-level implants were placed with machined healing abutments designed to be retrieved using a calibrated mucotome after soft-tissue healing. Test abutments were plasma-activated immediately before placement, whereas control abutments were left untreated. After 3 months, plaque index and bleeding on probing were recorded prior to collecting peri-implant soft-tissue biopsies. The specimens were processed and evaluated clinically and histologically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients with 30 implants completed the study. Histological evaluation showed lower inflammation scores in the basal zone around plasma-activated abutments (P = 0.04). Mean inflammation scores in the test group were 2.78 ± 0.7, 2.52 ± 0.5, and 1.72 ± 0.5 in the upper, intermediate, and basal zones, respectively, compared with 3.28 ± 0.8, 2.93 ± 0.6 and 2.36 ± 0.5 in controls. Connective-tissue maturation and epithelial regeneration were comparable between groups (approximately 3.1 and 3.0, respectively). Vascularization was slightly higher in the test group (1.20 ± 0.19 vs. 1.09 ± 0.05). The cornified layer contacting the abutment was significantly thicker in the test group (2.89 ± 0.8 vs. 1.91 ± 0.7, P = 0.008). No significant differences were observed for plaque index, whereas bleeding on probing was lower in the test group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Plasma-activated healing abutments were associated with localized histological differences at the epithelial-abutment interface, particularly in basal inflammation and cornified layer thickness, while most parameters remained comparable between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This prospective clinical trial aimed to histologically evaluate peri-implant soft tissue response to healing abutments treated with a vacuum plasma reactor.

Methods: Thirty bone-level implants were placed with machined healing abutments designed to be retrieved using a calibrated mucotome after soft-tissue healing. Test abutments were plasma-activated immediately before placement, whereas control abutments were left untreated. After 3 months, plaque index and bleeding on probing were recorded prior to collecting peri-implant soft-tissue biopsies. The specimens were processed and evaluated clinically and histologically.

Results: Thirty patients with 30 implants completed the study. Histological evaluation showed lower inflammation scores in the basal zone around plasma-activated abutments (P = 0.04). Mean inflammation scores in the test group were 2.78 ± 0.7, 2.52 ± 0.5, and 1.72 ± 0.5 in the upper, intermediate, and basal zones, respectively, compared with 3.28 ± 0.8, 2.93 ± 0.6 and 2.36 ± 0.5 in controls. Connective-tissue maturation and epithelial regeneration were comparable between groups (approximately 3.1 and 3.0, respectively). Vascularization was slightly higher in the test group (1.20 ± 0.19 vs. 1.09 ± 0.05). The cornified layer contacting the abutment was significantly thicker in the test group (2.89 ± 0.8 vs. 1.91 ± 0.7, P = 0.008). No significant differences were observed for plaque index, whereas bleeding on probing was lower in the test group.

Conclusions: Plasma-activated healing abutments were associated with localized histological differences at the epithelial-abutment interface, particularly in basal inflammation and cornified layer thickness, while most parameters remained comparable between groups.

软组织对血浆活化愈合基台反应的组织学评价:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。
目的:本前瞻性临床试验旨在组织学评估种植体周围软组织对真空等离子体反应器治疗的愈合基台的反应。方法:将30个骨水平种植体放置在机械愈合基台上,在软组织愈合后使用校准的黏液切割机进行回收。测试基牙在放置前立即进行等离子体激活,而对照基牙则不进行处理。3 个月后,在收集种植体周围软组织活检之前,记录斑块指数和探针出血。对标本进行临床和组织学处理和评价。结果:30例患者共植入30个种植体完成研究。组织学评价显示,血浆活化基台周围基底区炎症评分较低(P = 0.04)。试验组上、中、基底区平均炎症评分分别为2.78±0.7、2.52±0.5、1.72±0.5,对照组为3.28±0.8、2.93±0.6、2.36±0.5。结缔组织成熟度和上皮再生在两组之间具有可比性(分别约为3.1和3.0)。试验组血管成形率略高于对照组(1.20±0.19∶1.09±0.05)。实验组与基牙接触的牙冠层较对照组厚(2.89±0.8∶1.91±0.7,P = 0.008)。斑块指数无显著差异,而试验组的探查出血较低。结论:血浆激活愈合基牙与上皮-基牙界面的局部组织学差异有关,特别是在基底炎症和角膜硬化层厚度方面,而大多数参数在两组之间保持可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书