The effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policy framework: an analysis using the Anderson governance framework.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-05-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2670691
Radolf Ansbert Nortey, Irene Akwo Kretchy, Mercy Naa Aduele Opare-Addo, Kwame Ohene Buabeng
{"title":"The effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policy framework: an analysis using the Anderson governance framework.","authors":"Radolf Ansbert Nortey, Irene Akwo Kretchy, Mercy Naa Aduele Opare-Addo, Kwame Ohene Buabeng","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2670691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The burden of antimicrobial resistance is rapidly increasing, with the highest rates anticipated in Sub-Saharan Africa. Most countries around the world have expressed political commitment to strengthen antibiotic control and have adopted corresponding legislative policies. There are also repeated calls for more rigorous antibiotic controls and a coordination framework akin to the international system for controlled medicines. Ghana has instituted a policy on antimicrobial use and resistance, as well as a now-expired National Action Plan (NAP) on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). While there is growing support for stricter antibiotic control, concerns remain regarding the suitability of such interventions in local settings. This study examined the effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policies through the lens of the Anderson Governance framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed semi-structured interviews with purposively selected stakeholders from the antibiotic control landscape in Ghana. The interviews explored the effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policy and the NAP on AMR within the structural domains such as policy design, implementation tools, monitoring, and evaluation. The emerging data was coded and analysed thematically using Atlas.ti, guided by the Anderson Governance Framework and the COREQ guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen (17) stakeholders participated in the study. Participants described several challenges, including fragmented coordination, limited availability of data, insufficient stakeholder inclusivity, barriers to access and minimal use of digital tools. Although participants expressed a need for improved AMR surveillance, several cautioned that adopting a similar system to the international drug control framework could be detrimental to antibiotic access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights significant gaps within Ghana's antibiotic control policy framework, particularly in coordination, the integration of emerging digital technologies, and the inclusion of frontline implementers' perspectives. While restrictive control models may compromise access to essential antimicrobials, integrating selected digital components of such systems may offer useful insights for improving AMR surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2670691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13192104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2670691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The burden of antimicrobial resistance is rapidly increasing, with the highest rates anticipated in Sub-Saharan Africa. Most countries around the world have expressed political commitment to strengthen antibiotic control and have adopted corresponding legislative policies. There are also repeated calls for more rigorous antibiotic controls and a coordination framework akin to the international system for controlled medicines. Ghana has instituted a policy on antimicrobial use and resistance, as well as a now-expired National Action Plan (NAP) on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). While there is growing support for stricter antibiotic control, concerns remain regarding the suitability of such interventions in local settings. This study examined the effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policies through the lens of the Anderson Governance framework.

Methods: The study employed semi-structured interviews with purposively selected stakeholders from the antibiotic control landscape in Ghana. The interviews explored the effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policy and the NAP on AMR within the structural domains such as policy design, implementation tools, monitoring, and evaluation. The emerging data was coded and analysed thematically using Atlas.ti, guided by the Anderson Governance Framework and the COREQ guidelines.

Results: Seventeen (17) stakeholders participated in the study. Participants described several challenges, including fragmented coordination, limited availability of data, insufficient stakeholder inclusivity, barriers to access and minimal use of digital tools. Although participants expressed a need for improved AMR surveillance, several cautioned that adopting a similar system to the international drug control framework could be detrimental to antibiotic access.

Conclusion: The study highlights significant gaps within Ghana's antibiotic control policy framework, particularly in coordination, the integration of emerging digital technologies, and the inclusion of frontline implementers' perspectives. While restrictive control models may compromise access to essential antimicrobials, integrating selected digital components of such systems may offer useful insights for improving AMR surveillance.

加纳抗生素控制政策框架的有效性:使用安德森治理框架的分析。
背景:抗菌素耐药性负担正在迅速增加,预计撒哈拉以南非洲地区的发病率最高。世界上大多数国家都表达了加强抗生素控制的政治承诺,并采取了相应的立法政策。人们还一再呼吁更严格地控制抗生素,并建立类似于国际管制药物体系的协调框架。加纳制定了一项关于抗微生物药物使用和耐药性的政策,以及现已过期的抗微生物药物耐药性国家行动计划。虽然越来越多的人支持更严格的抗生素控制,但人们仍然关注这些干预措施在当地环境中的适用性。本研究通过安德森治理框架考察了加纳抗生素控制政策的有效性。方法:该研究采用半结构化访谈,有目的地选择加纳抗生素控制领域的利益相关者。访谈探讨了加纳抗生素控制政策和抗生素耐药性国家行动计划在政策设计、实施工具、监测和评估等结构性领域的有效性。使用Atlas对新出现的数据进行了主题编码和分析。在安德森治理框架和COREQ指导方针的指导下。结果:17(17)个利益相关者参与了研究。与会者描述了若干挑战,包括协调分散、数据可用性有限、利益攸关方包容性不足、获取障碍和数字工具使用最少。尽管与会者表示有必要改进抗菌素耐药性监测,但一些与会者警告说,采用与国际药物管制框架类似的系统可能不利于抗生素的获取。结论:该研究突出了加纳抗生素控制政策框架内的重大差距,特别是在协调、新兴数字技术的整合以及纳入一线实施者的观点方面。虽然限制性控制模式可能影响基本抗菌素的获取,但整合此类系统的选定数字组件可能为改进抗菌素耐药性监测提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书