Jae-Ha Jung, Eunseo Goh, Yeji Chun, Hyerin Lee, Jiwoo Baek, Yeongbae Seo, Yoonseo Choi, Yongbaek Kim
{"title":"Evaluation of analytical characteristics of the Vcheck C10 point-of-care chemistry analyser for feline sera.","authors":"Jae-Ha Jung, Eunseo Goh, Yeji Chun, Hyerin Lee, Jiwoo Baek, Yeongbae Seo, Yoonseo Choi, Yongbaek Kim","doi":"10.1177/1098612X261456678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to characterise the analytical performance of the Vcheck C10 dry chemistry analyser and evaluate its comparability with a reference wet chemistry system (AU480) in feline serum samples.MethodsAnalytical precision was determined by within-run and between-run testing using pooled serum and commercial quality control materials. Agreement between analysers for 16 biochemical analytes was examined using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis using 57 feline serum samples. Total observed error (TE<sub>obs</sub>) was assessed against published allowable total error (TE<sub>a</sub>) criteria to evaluate analytical quality.ResultsAcceptable precision was observed for the majority of analytes, although total bilirubin (TBIL) exhibited increased variability at lower concentration ranges. Regression analysis demonstrated strong linear associations for most analytes (<i>r</i> = 0.82-0.99). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that 94.4-98.0% of paired results were within the limits of agreement. Comparison of TE<sub>obs</sub> with TE<sub>a</sub> limits identified acceptable analytical performance for 10 analytes, whereas blood urea nitrogen, calcium, creatinine, TBIL and total protein exceeded allowable limits.Conclusions and relevanceThe Vcheck C10 demonstrated reliable analytical precision and favourable correlation with the reference analyser for most analytes in feline serum, supporting its utility in point-of-care testing in primary practice. Nevertheless, analyte-specific limitations in agreement with the wet chemistry reference method were identified for certain analytes, emphasising method-consistent interpretation and the use of analyser-specific reference intervals in clinical decision-making and longitudinal monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1098612X261456678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13319834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X261456678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to characterise the analytical performance of the Vcheck C10 dry chemistry analyser and evaluate its comparability with a reference wet chemistry system (AU480) in feline serum samples.MethodsAnalytical precision was determined by within-run and between-run testing using pooled serum and commercial quality control materials. Agreement between analysers for 16 biochemical analytes was examined using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis using 57 feline serum samples. Total observed error (TEobs) was assessed against published allowable total error (TEa) criteria to evaluate analytical quality.ResultsAcceptable precision was observed for the majority of analytes, although total bilirubin (TBIL) exhibited increased variability at lower concentration ranges. Regression analysis demonstrated strong linear associations for most analytes (r = 0.82-0.99). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that 94.4-98.0% of paired results were within the limits of agreement. Comparison of TEobs with TEa limits identified acceptable analytical performance for 10 analytes, whereas blood urea nitrogen, calcium, creatinine, TBIL and total protein exceeded allowable limits.Conclusions and relevanceThe Vcheck C10 demonstrated reliable analytical precision and favourable correlation with the reference analyser for most analytes in feline serum, supporting its utility in point-of-care testing in primary practice. Nevertheless, analyte-specific limitations in agreement with the wet chemistry reference method were identified for certain analytes, emphasising method-consistent interpretation and the use of analyser-specific reference intervals in clinical decision-making and longitudinal monitoring.
期刊介绍:
JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.