Evaluation of analytical characteristics of the Vcheck C10 point-of-care chemistry analyser for feline sera.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-26 DOI:10.1177/1098612X261456678
Jae-Ha Jung, Eunseo Goh, Yeji Chun, Hyerin Lee, Jiwoo Baek, Yeongbae Seo, Yoonseo Choi, Yongbaek Kim
{"title":"Evaluation of analytical characteristics of the Vcheck C10 point-of-care chemistry analyser for feline sera.","authors":"Jae-Ha Jung, Eunseo Goh, Yeji Chun, Hyerin Lee, Jiwoo Baek, Yeongbae Seo, Yoonseo Choi, Yongbaek Kim","doi":"10.1177/1098612X261456678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to characterise the analytical performance of the Vcheck C10 dry chemistry analyser and evaluate its comparability with a reference wet chemistry system (AU480) in feline serum samples.MethodsAnalytical precision was determined by within-run and between-run testing using pooled serum and commercial quality control materials. Agreement between analysers for 16 biochemical analytes was examined using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis using 57 feline serum samples. Total observed error (TE<sub>obs</sub>) was assessed against published allowable total error (TE<sub>a</sub>) criteria to evaluate analytical quality.ResultsAcceptable precision was observed for the majority of analytes, although total bilirubin (TBIL) exhibited increased variability at lower concentration ranges. Regression analysis demonstrated strong linear associations for most analytes (<i>r</i> = 0.82-0.99). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that 94.4-98.0% of paired results were within the limits of agreement. Comparison of TE<sub>obs</sub> with TE<sub>a</sub> limits identified acceptable analytical performance for 10 analytes, whereas blood urea nitrogen, calcium, creatinine, TBIL and total protein exceeded allowable limits.Conclusions and relevanceThe Vcheck C10 demonstrated reliable analytical precision and favourable correlation with the reference analyser for most analytes in feline serum, supporting its utility in point-of-care testing in primary practice. Nevertheless, analyte-specific limitations in agreement with the wet chemistry reference method were identified for certain analytes, emphasising method-consistent interpretation and the use of analyser-specific reference intervals in clinical decision-making and longitudinal monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1098612X261456678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13319834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X261456678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to characterise the analytical performance of the Vcheck C10 dry chemistry analyser and evaluate its comparability with a reference wet chemistry system (AU480) in feline serum samples.MethodsAnalytical precision was determined by within-run and between-run testing using pooled serum and commercial quality control materials. Agreement between analysers for 16 biochemical analytes was examined using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis using 57 feline serum samples. Total observed error (TEobs) was assessed against published allowable total error (TEa) criteria to evaluate analytical quality.ResultsAcceptable precision was observed for the majority of analytes, although total bilirubin (TBIL) exhibited increased variability at lower concentration ranges. Regression analysis demonstrated strong linear associations for most analytes (r = 0.82-0.99). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that 94.4-98.0% of paired results were within the limits of agreement. Comparison of TEobs with TEa limits identified acceptable analytical performance for 10 analytes, whereas blood urea nitrogen, calcium, creatinine, TBIL and total protein exceeded allowable limits.Conclusions and relevanceThe Vcheck C10 demonstrated reliable analytical precision and favourable correlation with the reference analyser for most analytes in feline serum, supporting its utility in point-of-care testing in primary practice. Nevertheless, analyte-specific limitations in agreement with the wet chemistry reference method were identified for certain analytes, emphasising method-consistent interpretation and the use of analyser-specific reference intervals in clinical decision-making and longitudinal monitoring.

EXPRESS: Vcheck C10猫血清即时化学分析仪分析特性的评价。
目的:表征Vcheck C10干化学分析仪在猫血清样品中的分析性能,并评价其与参考湿化学系统(AU480)的可比性。方法:采用混合血清和市售质控品,采用批内、批间检测方法测定分析精密度。使用57份猫血清样本,采用Passing-Bablok回归和Bland-Altman分析检查了16种生化分析的分析仪之间的一致性。总观测误差(TEobs)根据公布的允许总误差(TE)标准进行评估,以评估分析质量。结果:虽然TBIL在较低浓度范围内表现出增加的变异性,但大多数分析物的精度可接受。回归分析显示,大多数分析物具有很强的线性相关性(r = 0.82-0.99)。Bland-Altman分析表明94.4-98.0%的配对结果在一致范围内。将TEobs与TE - ph限值进行比较,确定了10种分析物的可接受分析性能,而BUN, CA, CREA, TBIL和TP超出了允许的限值。结论和相关性:Vcheck C10显示出可靠的分析精度,并与大多数猫血清分析物的参考分析仪具有良好的相关性,支持其在初级实践中的点护理测试的实用性。然而,与湿化学参考方法一致的分析物特异性局限性被确定为某些分析物,强调方法一致的解释和在临床决策和纵向监测中使用分析物特异性参考区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书