Analysis of the efficacy of a model for auxiliary diagnosis of aortic aneurysms based on clinical pathological features.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Dian Yu, Xiaoyun Song, Yuanze Ma, Jing Tian, Yi Han
{"title":"Analysis of the efficacy of a model for auxiliary diagnosis of aortic aneurysms based on clinical pathological features.","authors":"Dian Yu, Xiaoyun Song, Yuanze Ma, Jing Tian, Yi Han","doi":"10.7555/JBR.40.20260085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated a multi-parameter serological model for the auxiliary diagnosis of aortic aneurysm (AA). Clinical data and serological indicators were collected from 1397 AA patients and 2000 healthy controls recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (June 2021-June 2025). A comprehensive diagnostic model was developed based on serum biomarkers. Significant differences were observed between AA patients and healthy controls in blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), inflammatory markers ( <i>e.g.</i>, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count), hepatic and renal function indicators ( <i>e.g.</i>, urea, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase), and nutritional parameters ( <i>e.g.</i>, albumin, total protein, and hemoglobin) ( <i>P</i> < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified BMI, systolic blood pressure, urea, and neutrophil count as independent risk factors (OR > 1), while lymphocyte count, albumin, and serum potassium were protective factors (OR < 1). Twenty-three key variables were further selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The constructed comprehensive RiskScore showed a highly significant difference between the AA group and the control group (-16.27 ± 4.69 <i>vs.</i> -21.36 ± 1.46, <i>P</i> < 0.001), with the model demonstrating excellent discriminatory performance (concordance index [C-index] > 0.9). The results indicate that a multi-parameter serological diagnostic model distinguishes between AA patients and healthy controls, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability and potential uitility for auxiliary diagnosis of AA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.40.20260085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated a multi-parameter serological model for the auxiliary diagnosis of aortic aneurysm (AA). Clinical data and serological indicators were collected from 1397 AA patients and 2000 healthy controls recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (June 2021-June 2025). A comprehensive diagnostic model was developed based on serum biomarkers. Significant differences were observed between AA patients and healthy controls in blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), inflammatory markers ( e.g., white blood cell count, and neutrophil count), hepatic and renal function indicators ( e.g., urea, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase), and nutritional parameters ( e.g., albumin, total protein, and hemoglobin) ( P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified BMI, systolic blood pressure, urea, and neutrophil count as independent risk factors (OR > 1), while lymphocyte count, albumin, and serum potassium were protective factors (OR < 1). Twenty-three key variables were further selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The constructed comprehensive RiskScore showed a highly significant difference between the AA group and the control group (-16.27 ± 4.69 vs. -21.36 ± 1.46, P < 0.001), with the model demonstrating excellent discriminatory performance (concordance index [C-index] > 0.9). The results indicate that a multi-parameter serological diagnostic model distinguishes between AA patients and healthy controls, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability and potential uitility for auxiliary diagnosis of AA.

基于临床病理特征的主动脉瘤辅助诊断模型疗效分析。
本研究评估多参数血清学模型辅助诊断主动脉瘤(AA)。收集哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院(2012.06 - 2012.06)1397例AA患者和2000例健康对照者的临床资料和血清学指标。建立了基于血清生物标志物的综合诊断模型。AA患者与健康对照组在血压、体重指数(BMI)、炎症指标(如白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数)、肝肾功能指标(如尿素、总胆红素、碱性磷酸酶)、营养指标(如白蛋白、总蛋白、血红蛋白)等方面差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素分析发现BMI、收缩压、尿素和中性粒细胞计数是独立危险因素(OR < 1),而淋巴细胞计数、白蛋白和血清钾是保护因素(OR < 1)。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归进一步选择23个关键变量。构建的综合RiskScore在AA组与对照组之间差异极显著(-16.27±4.69 vs -21.36±1.46,P < 0.001),模型具有良好的区分性能(一致性指数[C-index] > 0.9)。结果表明,多参数血清学诊断模型能够区分AA患者和健康对照,具有较强的鉴别能力和潜在的辅助诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Research
Journal of Biomedical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书