Differential Impact of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on Right Ventricular Function: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_134_25
Jyoti Agarwal, Abid M Sadiq, Jennifer Khati, Bagirath Raghuraman
{"title":"Differential Impact of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on Right Ventricular Function: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jyoti Agarwal, Abid M Sadiq, Jennifer Khati, Bagirath Raghuraman","doi":"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_134_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right ventricular (RV) function is an important determinant of outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing valve replacement. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), comparative data on RV remodeling in the Indian population remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to evaluate echocardiographic changes in RV function following SAVR and TAVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary cardiac center in India between January and December 2024. One hundred consecutive patients with severe AS underwent echocardiography at baseline, immediately postprocedure, and at 6-9-month follow-up. RV function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tissue Doppler-derived S', and RV fractional area change (RVFAC), alongside left-sided and hemodynamic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After TAVR, RV function indices remained stable (TAPSE: 18.3 vs. 18.1 vs. 18.3 mm; S': 10.6 vs. 10.6 vs. 10.8 cm/s; RVFAC: 39.2% vs. 39.0% vs. 40.0%; all <i>P</i> > 0.1). In contrast, SAVR caused an acute decline in TAPSE (19.5-12.8 mm), S' (11.6-7.7 cm/s), and RVFAC (42.0% to 27.6%) immediately postprocedure (all <i>P</i> < 0.001), with only partial recovery at follow-up. Both procedures significantly reduced aortic gradients and pulmonary pressures, with improvements in LV ejection fraction at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAVR is associated with significant perioperative RV dysfunction that remains incompletely reversible, whereas TAVR preserves RV performance while achieving equivalent hemodynamic benefits. Incorporating RV assessment into preprocedural planning and follow-up may enhance patient selection and postoperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","volume":"36 1","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13197040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_134_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular (RV) function is an important determinant of outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing valve replacement. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), comparative data on RV remodeling in the Indian population remain limited.

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate echocardiographic changes in RV function following SAVR and TAVR.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary cardiac center in India between January and December 2024. One hundred consecutive patients with severe AS underwent echocardiography at baseline, immediately postprocedure, and at 6-9-month follow-up. RV function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tissue Doppler-derived S', and RV fractional area change (RVFAC), alongside left-sided and hemodynamic parameters.

Results: After TAVR, RV function indices remained stable (TAPSE: 18.3 vs. 18.1 vs. 18.3 mm; S': 10.6 vs. 10.6 vs. 10.8 cm/s; RVFAC: 39.2% vs. 39.0% vs. 40.0%; all P > 0.1). In contrast, SAVR caused an acute decline in TAPSE (19.5-12.8 mm), S' (11.6-7.7 cm/s), and RVFAC (42.0% to 27.6%) immediately postprocedure (all P < 0.001), with only partial recovery at follow-up. Both procedures significantly reduced aortic gradients and pulmonary pressures, with improvements in LV ejection fraction at follow-up.

Conclusions: SAVR is associated with significant perioperative RV dysfunction that remains incompletely reversible, whereas TAVR preserves RV performance while achieving equivalent hemodynamic benefits. Incorporating RV assessment into preprocedural planning and follow-up may enhance patient selection and postoperative care.

经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术对右心室功能的不同影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:右心室(RV)功能是主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)置换术患者预后的重要决定因素。虽然经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的替代方法,但印度人群中RV重构的比较数据仍然有限。目的:本研究的目的是评价SAVR和TAVR术后右室功能的超声心动图变化。方法:我们于2024年1月至12月在印度的一家三级心脏中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。100名连续的严重AS患者在基线、术后立即和6-9个月的随访期间接受了超声心动图检查。通过三尖瓣环形平面收缩偏移(TAPSE)、组织多普勒衍生S'、右心室分数面积变化(RVFAC)以及左侧和血流动力学参数评估右心室功能。结果:TAVR术后,RV功能指标保持稳定(TAPSE: 18.3 vs. 18.1 vs. 18.3 mm; S′:10.6 vs. 10.6 vs. 10.8 cm/ S; RVFAC: 39.2% vs. 39.0% vs. 40.0%; P值均为0.1)。相比之下,SAVR在术后立即引起TAPSE (19.5-12.8 mm), S' (11.6-7.7 cm/ S)和RVFAC(42.0%至27.6%)的急性下降(均P < 0.001),随访时仅部分恢复。两种手术均可显著降低主动脉梯度和肺动脉压,并改善左室射血分数。结论:SAVR与严重的围手术期右心室功能障碍相关,这种功能障碍仍然不完全可逆,而TAVR在保持右心室功能的同时获得等效的血流动力学益处。将RV评估纳入术前计划和随访可以加强患者选择和术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书