Evaluation of salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol levels in patients undergoing orthodontic mini-implant treatment: a short-term prospective comparative study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ismayil Malikov, Turkan Sezen Erhamza, Himmet Yildirim, Ebru Ilhan Kocak, Osman Caglayan
{"title":"Evaluation of salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol levels in patients undergoing orthodontic mini-implant treatment: a short-term prospective comparative study.","authors":"Ismayil Malikov, Turkan Sezen Erhamza, Himmet Yildirim, Ebru Ilhan Kocak, Osman Caglayan","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) and salivary cortisol (sC) levels, alongside self-reported dental anxiety, in patients undergoing orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement compared with those receiving routine orthodontic treatment (noninvasive follow-up procedures such as archwire or elastic ligature replacement). The primary outcomes were the changes in sC and sAA levels, while the secondary outcome was the dental fear survey (DFS) score. It was hypothesized that OMI placement would elicit stronger physiological and psychological stress responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A short-term prospective comparative study was conducted on 54 participants (27 OMI and 27 control), aged 12-30 years. Dental anxiety was assessed using the DFS. Salivary samples were collected at baseline (T1) and immediately after the procedure (T2) for sAA and sC analysis. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, t-tests, and mixed ANOVA were performed (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>sC increased significantly in the OMI group (0.30 ± 0.09 to 0.39 ± 0.13 µg/dl; Δ = +0.09 µg/dl, P < .001) but remained stable in controls. The OMI group demonstrated higher DFS scores than controls (63.81 ± 22.59 vs. 40.07 ± 21.28). Female participants reported higher dental fear than males (P = .004), and DFS correlated negatively with age (P = .014). sAA levels were higher in the OMI group, although neither group nor time effects were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Orthodontic mini-implant placement induces stronger acute stress responses than routine orthodontic treatment, as evidenced by higher dental fear and increased salivary cortisol. These findings highlight the need for enhanced patient management during invasive orthodontic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13201089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) and salivary cortisol (sC) levels, alongside self-reported dental anxiety, in patients undergoing orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement compared with those receiving routine orthodontic treatment (noninvasive follow-up procedures such as archwire or elastic ligature replacement). The primary outcomes were the changes in sC and sAA levels, while the secondary outcome was the dental fear survey (DFS) score. It was hypothesized that OMI placement would elicit stronger physiological and psychological stress responses.

Methods: A short-term prospective comparative study was conducted on 54 participants (27 OMI and 27 control), aged 12-30 years. Dental anxiety was assessed using the DFS. Salivary samples were collected at baseline (T1) and immediately after the procedure (T2) for sAA and sC analysis. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, t-tests, and mixed ANOVA were performed (α = 0.05).

Results: sC increased significantly in the OMI group (0.30 ± 0.09 to 0.39 ± 0.13 µg/dl; Δ = +0.09 µg/dl, P < .001) but remained stable in controls. The OMI group demonstrated higher DFS scores than controls (63.81 ± 22.59 vs. 40.07 ± 21.28). Female participants reported higher dental fear than males (P = .004), and DFS correlated negatively with age (P = .014). sAA levels were higher in the OMI group, although neither group nor time effects were significant.

Conclusions: Orthodontic mini-implant placement induces stronger acute stress responses than routine orthodontic treatment, as evidenced by higher dental fear and increased salivary cortisol. These findings highlight the need for enhanced patient management during invasive orthodontic interventions.

正畸微型种植体治疗患者唾液α -淀粉酶和皮质醇水平的评估:一项短期前瞻性比较研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估接受迷你种植体(OMI)正畸治疗的患者与接受常规正畸治疗(如弓丝或弹性结扎置换等无创随访程序)的患者的唾液α -淀粉酶(sAA)和唾液皮质醇(sC)水平,以及自我报告的牙科焦虑。主要指标为sC和sAA水平的变化,次要指标为牙科恐惧调查(DFS)评分。假设OMI安置会引起更强的生理和心理应激反应。方法:对54例年龄12 ~ 30岁的患者进行短期前瞻性比较研究(对照组27例,OMI 27例)。使用DFS评估牙齿焦虑。在基线(T1)和手术后(T2)立即收集唾液样本进行sAA和sC分析。采用Mann-Whitney U、Wilcoxon、t检验和混合方差分析(α = 0.05)。结果:sC在OMI组显著升高(0.30±0.09 ~ 0.39±0.13µg/dl; Δ = +0.09µg/dl, P < 0.001),对照组保持稳定。OMI组DFS评分高于对照组(63.81±22.59比40.07±21.28)。女性受试者报告的牙科恐惧高于男性(P = 0.004), DFS与年龄呈负相关(P = 0.014)。OMI组sAA水平较高,但组效应和时间效应均不显著。结论:与常规正畸治疗相比,迷你种植体植入正畸治疗可引起更强的急性应激反应,这可以通过更高的牙齿恐惧和唾液皮质醇升高来证明。这些发现强调了在侵入性正畸干预期间加强患者管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书