Advances in machine learning for cardiac event prediction: where can we still improve?

IF 2.5 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sasha-Ann East, Kameswari Maganti, Partho Sengupta
{"title":"Advances in machine learning for cardiac event prediction: where can we still improve?","authors":"Sasha-Ann East, Kameswari Maganti, Partho Sengupta","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2026.2674710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing a transformative role in cardiovascular care by enabling more precise prediction of adverse clinical events across prevention, imaging, electrophysiology, and interventional practice. AI models integrate high-dimensional clinical data and imaging-derived phenotypes to improve risk stratification beyond traditional scoring systems, identifying patients who may benefit from earlier, targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines recent advances in AI-based cardiovascular event prediction, focusing on coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, and valvular heart disease. In these domains, AI transcends conventional markers-such as ejection fraction and stenosis severity-to extract prognostically relevant insights from complex data streams. Despite this potential, clinical translation remains limited. Many models are retrospective, rely heavily on discrimination metrics, and lack consistent validation across diverse health systems and patient subgroups. Furthermore, risk estimates are rarely linked to explicit management pathways.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>To facilitate adoption, we prioritize: rigorous external and prospective validation with a focus on calibration and fairness; coupling predictions with actionable care algorithms; and developing interpretable, workflow-integrated tools. Overcoming these barriers is essential to establishing AI-based risk prediction as a reliable clinical standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"449-461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2026.2674710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing a transformative role in cardiovascular care by enabling more precise prediction of adverse clinical events across prevention, imaging, electrophysiology, and interventional practice. AI models integrate high-dimensional clinical data and imaging-derived phenotypes to improve risk stratification beyond traditional scoring systems, identifying patients who may benefit from earlier, targeted interventions.

Areas covered: This review examines recent advances in AI-based cardiovascular event prediction, focusing on coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, and valvular heart disease. In these domains, AI transcends conventional markers-such as ejection fraction and stenosis severity-to extract prognostically relevant insights from complex data streams. Despite this potential, clinical translation remains limited. Many models are retrospective, rely heavily on discrimination metrics, and lack consistent validation across diverse health systems and patient subgroups. Furthermore, risk estimates are rarely linked to explicit management pathways.

Expert opinion: To facilitate adoption, we prioritize: rigorous external and prospective validation with a focus on calibration and fairness; coupling predictions with actionable care algorithms; and developing interpretable, workflow-integrated tools. Overcoming these barriers is essential to establishing AI-based risk prediction as a reliable clinical standard.

心脏事件预测的机器学习进展:我们还可以在哪里改进?
人工智能(AI)通过在预防、成像、电生理和介入实践中更精确地预测不良临床事件,在心血管护理中发挥着变革性作用。人工智能模型整合了高维临床数据和成像衍生的表型,以改进传统评分系统之外的风险分层,识别可能从早期有针对性的干预中受益的患者。涵盖领域:本文综述了基于人工智能的心血管事件预测的最新进展,重点是冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭、心律失常和瓣膜性心脏病。在这些领域,人工智能超越了传统的标记,如射血分数和狭窄严重程度,从复杂的数据流中提取与预后相关的见解。尽管有这种潜力,临床翻译仍然有限。许多模型是回顾性的,严重依赖于歧视指标,在不同的卫生系统和患者亚组中缺乏一致的验证。此外,风险评估很少与明确的管理途径联系在一起。专家意见:为了便于采用,我们优先考虑:严格的外部和前瞻性验证,重点是校准和公平性;将预测与可操作护理算法相结合;开发可解释的、工作流集成的工具。克服这些障碍对于将基于人工智能的风险预测建立为可靠的临床标准至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书