{"title":"The Needs of Patients with Cancer Interested in Complementary and Alternative Medicine with Respect to the Physician's Attitude and Behaviour.","authors":"Gianluca Ciarlo, Lena Josfeld, Jutta Hübner","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2026.2675656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), often seeking a more holistic approach. This study explored whether patients have different communication expectations for oncologists and any professional provider of CAM. Patients attending CAM consultations at an integrative counseling unit of a German university hospital completed a standardized questionnaire. Most reported significant limitations in daily life due to cancer. Common motivations for CAM use included reducing side effects and supporting conventional treatment. Overall, patients expressed similar expectations for both oncologists and CAM providers regarding physician attitude, consultation behavior, and preferred topics. Respectful and honest behavior during medical consultations was most valued. Despite differing therapeutic goals between CAM and conventional medicine, patients did not differentiate in their communication needs. They valued honesty, trustworthiness, time for questions, and a clear treatment plan-regardless the provider's medical background. These findings suggest that cancer survivors seek concrete, evidence-based dialogue and consistent interpersonal qualities across disciplines. Communication preferences appear shaped more by interaction quality than by medical system. Patients want to feel heard, respected, and informed, whether consulting a conventional oncologist or a CAM provider. This underscores the importance of unified communication standards in oncology care and highlights shared expectations patients hold across treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"755-768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2026.2675656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), often seeking a more holistic approach. This study explored whether patients have different communication expectations for oncologists and any professional provider of CAM. Patients attending CAM consultations at an integrative counseling unit of a German university hospital completed a standardized questionnaire. Most reported significant limitations in daily life due to cancer. Common motivations for CAM use included reducing side effects and supporting conventional treatment. Overall, patients expressed similar expectations for both oncologists and CAM providers regarding physician attitude, consultation behavior, and preferred topics. Respectful and honest behavior during medical consultations was most valued. Despite differing therapeutic goals between CAM and conventional medicine, patients did not differentiate in their communication needs. They valued honesty, trustworthiness, time for questions, and a clear treatment plan-regardless the provider's medical background. These findings suggest that cancer survivors seek concrete, evidence-based dialogue and consistent interpersonal qualities across disciplines. Communication preferences appear shaped more by interaction quality than by medical system. Patients want to feel heard, respected, and informed, whether consulting a conventional oncologist or a CAM provider. This underscores the importance of unified communication standards in oncology care and highlights shared expectations patients hold across treatment approaches.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.