The Needs of Patients with Cancer Interested in Complementary and Alternative Medicine with Respect to the Physician's Attitude and Behaviour.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Investigation Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-26 DOI:10.1080/07357907.2026.2675656
Gianluca Ciarlo, Lena Josfeld, Jutta Hübner
{"title":"The Needs of Patients with Cancer Interested in Complementary and Alternative Medicine with Respect to the Physician's Attitude and Behaviour.","authors":"Gianluca Ciarlo, Lena Josfeld, Jutta Hübner","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2026.2675656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), often seeking a more holistic approach. This study explored whether patients have different communication expectations for oncologists and any professional provider of CAM. Patients attending CAM consultations at an integrative counseling unit of a German university hospital completed a standardized questionnaire. Most reported significant limitations in daily life due to cancer. Common motivations for CAM use included reducing side effects and supporting conventional treatment. Overall, patients expressed similar expectations for both oncologists and CAM providers regarding physician attitude, consultation behavior, and preferred topics. Respectful and honest behavior during medical consultations was most valued. Despite differing therapeutic goals between CAM and conventional medicine, patients did not differentiate in their communication needs. They valued honesty, trustworthiness, time for questions, and a clear treatment plan-regardless the provider's medical background. These findings suggest that cancer survivors seek concrete, evidence-based dialogue and consistent interpersonal qualities across disciplines. Communication preferences appear shaped more by interaction quality than by medical system. Patients want to feel heard, respected, and informed, whether consulting a conventional oncologist or a CAM provider. This underscores the importance of unified communication standards in oncology care and highlights shared expectations patients hold across treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"755-768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2026.2675656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), often seeking a more holistic approach. This study explored whether patients have different communication expectations for oncologists and any professional provider of CAM. Patients attending CAM consultations at an integrative counseling unit of a German university hospital completed a standardized questionnaire. Most reported significant limitations in daily life due to cancer. Common motivations for CAM use included reducing side effects and supporting conventional treatment. Overall, patients expressed similar expectations for both oncologists and CAM providers regarding physician attitude, consultation behavior, and preferred topics. Respectful and honest behavior during medical consultations was most valued. Despite differing therapeutic goals between CAM and conventional medicine, patients did not differentiate in their communication needs. They valued honesty, trustworthiness, time for questions, and a clear treatment plan-regardless the provider's medical background. These findings suggest that cancer survivors seek concrete, evidence-based dialogue and consistent interpersonal qualities across disciplines. Communication preferences appear shaped more by interaction quality than by medical system. Patients want to feel heard, respected, and informed, whether consulting a conventional oncologist or a CAM provider. This underscores the importance of unified communication standards in oncology care and highlights shared expectations patients hold across treatment approaches.

对补充和替代医学感兴趣的癌症患者的需求与医生的态度和行为。
许多癌症患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM),通常寻求更全面的方法。本研究探讨患者对肿瘤学家和任何CAM专业提供者是否有不同的沟通期望。在德国大学医院的综合咨询单位参加CAM咨询的患者完成了一份标准化问卷。大多数人报告说,由于癌症,他们的日常生活受到了重大限制。使用辅助治疗的常见动机包括减少副作用和支持常规治疗。总体而言,患者对肿瘤学家和CAM提供者在医生态度、咨询行为和首选话题方面表达了相似的期望。在医疗咨询期间,尊重和诚实的行为是最受重视的。尽管CAM和传统医学的治疗目标不同,但患者在沟通需求上并没有区别。他们看重的是诚实、可信、提问时间和明确的治疗方案——不管医生的医学背景如何。这些发现表明,癌症幸存者寻求具体的、基于证据的对话和跨学科的一致的人际关系品质。交流偏好似乎更多地受到互动质量的影响,而不是医疗系统的影响。无论是咨询传统的肿瘤学家还是CAM提供者,患者都希望感受到被倾听、被尊重和被告知的感觉。这强调了肿瘤护理中统一沟通标准的重要性,并强调了患者对不同治疗方法的共同期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Investigation
Cancer Investigation 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书