How Have Researchers Estimated the Impact of Excess Weight on Mortality? A Systematic Review.

IF 17 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Guadalupe García, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Lucía de Luis Cid, Mónica Pérez-Ríos
{"title":"How Have Researchers Estimated the Impact of Excess Weight on Mortality? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Guadalupe García, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Lucía de Luis Cid, Mónica Pérez-Ríos","doi":"10.1007/s13679-026-00719-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review is to describe and reflect on the methodology of the studies that estimate the attributable mortality (AM) to excess weight. The purpose was to provide a methodological framework and serve as a starting point to improve the estimation of AM to excess weight. This will lead to more comparable estimates over time and across countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted considering MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase and Web of Science databases. Studies that had estimated AM to excess weight published until December 2024 were included. Data extraction was performed in an ad-hoc table based on the STREAMS-P tool, and a descriptive analysis of the methodology employed was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 2,163 results. Twenty-three studies estimating AM in four continents were included. The majority estimated AM to all-cause mortality (n = 9) and for cardiovascular diseases (n = 9), followed by cancer without specifying which type of cancer (n = 7). Variation was observed in the body mass index (BMI) cut-off points used to define overweight, obesity and excess weight. Thirteen studies applied the population attributable fraction (PAF) formula denoted by PAF = [P (RR-1)] / [1 + P (RR-1)]. Most of the relative risks (RR) derived from meta-analysis (n = 14), and only a minority studies (n = 6) used RR from national studies based on the population for which AM was estimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review emphasizes methodological constraints on AM estimation to excess weight. Causes of death causally associated with excess weight should be prioritized rather than relying solely on all-cause mortality. The ideal scenario would be to consider lag times; RR derived from the population under study and to use WHO BMI cut-offs and measured data rather than self-reported weight and height. The absence of this data should not prevent AM estimation if limitations are acknowledged. Expanding available estimates worldwide is essential to improve understanding of the mortality burden associated with excess weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":10846,"journal":{"name":"Current Obesity Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13201345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Obesity Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-026-00719-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review is to describe and reflect on the methodology of the studies that estimate the attributable mortality (AM) to excess weight. The purpose was to provide a methodological framework and serve as a starting point to improve the estimation of AM to excess weight. This will lead to more comparable estimates over time and across countries.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted considering MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase and Web of Science databases. Studies that had estimated AM to excess weight published until December 2024 were included. Data extraction was performed in an ad-hoc table based on the STREAMS-P tool, and a descriptive analysis of the methodology employed was performed.

Results: The search strategy yielded 2,163 results. Twenty-three studies estimating AM in four continents were included. The majority estimated AM to all-cause mortality (n = 9) and for cardiovascular diseases (n = 9), followed by cancer without specifying which type of cancer (n = 7). Variation was observed in the body mass index (BMI) cut-off points used to define overweight, obesity and excess weight. Thirteen studies applied the population attributable fraction (PAF) formula denoted by PAF = [P (RR-1)] / [1 + P (RR-1)]. Most of the relative risks (RR) derived from meta-analysis (n = 14), and only a minority studies (n = 6) used RR from national studies based on the population for which AM was estimated.

Conclusion: This review emphasizes methodological constraints on AM estimation to excess weight. Causes of death causally associated with excess weight should be prioritized rather than relying solely on all-cause mortality. The ideal scenario would be to consider lag times; RR derived from the population under study and to use WHO BMI cut-offs and measured data rather than self-reported weight and height. The absence of this data should not prevent AM estimation if limitations are acknowledged. Expanding available estimates worldwide is essential to improve understanding of the mortality burden associated with excess weight.

研究人员如何估计超重对死亡率的影响?系统评价。
目的:本综述的目的是描述和反思估计超重可归因死亡率(AM)的研究方法。目的是提供一个方法框架,并作为一个起点,以改善AM对超重的估计。这将使不同时期和不同国家的估计数更具可比性。方法:采用MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase和Web of Science数据库进行系统评价。在2024年12月之前发表的估计AM超重的研究也包括在内。在基于STREAMS-P工具的特设表中进行数据提取,并对所采用的方法进行描述性分析。结果:搜索策略产生了2163个结果。包括在四大洲估计AM的23项研究。大多数人将AM估计为全因死亡率(n = 9)和心血管疾病(n = 9),其次是癌症(n = 7),但没有指明是哪种癌症(n = 7)。在用于定义超重、肥胖和超重的体重指数(BMI)分界点上观察到变化。13项研究采用群体归因分数(PAF)公式,PAF = [P (r -1)] / [1 + P (r -1)]。大多数相对风险(RR)来自荟萃分析(n = 14),只有少数研究(n = 6)使用了基于估计AM的人群的国家研究的RR。结论:本综述强调了AM对超重估计的方法学约束。应优先考虑与超重有因果关系的死亡原因,而不是仅仅依赖于全因死亡率。理想的情况是考虑延迟时间;RR来自研究人群,并使用世卫组织BMI截止值和测量数据,而不是自我报告的体重和身高。如果承认存在局限性,则没有这些数据不应妨碍调幅估计。扩大世界范围内现有的估计对于增进对与超重有关的死亡率负担的了解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Obesity Reports
Current Obesity Reports Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The main objective of Current Obesity Reports is to provide expert review articles on recent advancements in the interdisciplinary field of obesity research. Our aim is to offer clear, insightful, and balanced contributions that will benefit all individuals involved in the treatment and prevention of obesity, as well as related conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, endocrine disorders, gynecological issues, cancer, mental health, respiratory complications, and rheumatological diseases. We strive to redefine the way knowledge is expressed and provide organized content for the benefit of our readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书