Ureteral wall thickness as an imaging-based predictor of difficult ureter during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a retrospective analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ye Chen, Jun Zhang, Linbo Li, Yuanjing Shen, Xinwu Guo, Gang Li
{"title":"Ureteral wall thickness as an imaging-based predictor of difficult ureter during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Ye Chen, Jun Zhang, Linbo Li, Yuanjing Shen, Xinwu Guo, Gang Li","doi":"10.1186/s12894-026-02189-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) obtained from non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for predicting difficult ureter (DU) among patients receiving ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with unilateral ureteral stones managed by URS were retrospectively reviewed. According to intraoperative findings, they were classified into DU or non-DU group. UWT was measured at the level of the stone on preoperative NCCT. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of UWT for predicting DU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 271 patients managed with URS were enrolled in the study, with 67 (24.72%) in the DU group and 204 (75.28%) in the non-DU group. The mean UWT in the DU group was 3.77 ± 1.24 mm, which was significantly higher than that in the non-DU group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that UWT was an independent risk factor for DU, with an OR of 2.139 (95% CI: 1.634-2.79). The ROC curve demonstrated that a UWT cutoff of 2.9 mm provided the best threshold for predicting DU, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 77.6% and 71.6%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.786. Moreover, a UWT greater than 2.9 mm was associated with abnormal endoscopic findings during surgery, prolonged operative time, and a reduced stone-free rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UWT is an independent risk factor for DU. Preoperative measurement of UWT holds significant value in predicting DU. These findings may assist in surgical planning before URS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13383396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02189-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) obtained from non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for predicting difficult ureter (DU) among patients receiving ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS).

Methods: Patients with unilateral ureteral stones managed by URS were retrospectively reviewed. According to intraoperative findings, they were classified into DU or non-DU group. UWT was measured at the level of the stone on preoperative NCCT. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of UWT for predicting DU.

Results: A total of 271 patients managed with URS were enrolled in the study, with 67 (24.72%) in the DU group and 204 (75.28%) in the non-DU group. The mean UWT in the DU group was 3.77 ± 1.24 mm, which was significantly higher than that in the non-DU group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that UWT was an independent risk factor for DU, with an OR of 2.139 (95% CI: 1.634-2.79). The ROC curve demonstrated that a UWT cutoff of 2.9 mm provided the best threshold for predicting DU, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 77.6% and 71.6%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.786. Moreover, a UWT greater than 2.9 mm was associated with abnormal endoscopic findings during surgery, prolonged operative time, and a reduced stone-free rate.

Conclusion: UWT is an independent risk factor for DU. Preoperative measurement of UWT holds significant value in predicting DU. These findings may assist in surgical planning before URS.

输尿管壁厚度作为输尿管镜碎石术中输尿管困难的影像学预测指标:回顾性分析。
目的:评价非对比ct (NCCT)输尿管壁厚度(UWT)对输尿管镜碎石术(URS)患者输尿管困难(DU)的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析泌尿外科手术治疗单侧输尿管结石的病例。根据术中表现分为DU组和非DU组。术前NCCT在结石水平测量UWT。采用多元逻辑回归确定独立预测因子。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定预测DU的最佳UWT截止值。结果:共有271例URS患者入组,其中DU组67例(24.72%),非DU组204例(75.28%)。DU组平均UWT为3.77±1.24 mm,明显高于非DU组。多因素logistic回归显示,UWT是DU的独立危险因素,OR为2.139 (95% CI: 1.634-2.79)。ROC曲线显示,UWT截止值为2.9 mm为预测DU的最佳阈值,灵敏度和特异度分别为77.6%和71.6%,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.786。此外,UWT大于2.9 mm与手术期间的异常内镜发现、手术时间延长和结石清除率降低有关。结论:UWT是DU的独立危险因素。术前测量UWT对预测DU具有重要价值。这些发现可能有助于URS术前的手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书