The protective value of the size and movement components of deimatic behavior.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-04-30 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1093/beheco/arag047
Liisa Hämäläinen, Connor M Marsland, Thomas E White, Hannah M Rowland, Kate D L Umbers
{"title":"The protective value of the size and movement components of deimatic behavior.","authors":"Liisa Hämäläinen, Connor M Marsland, Thomas E White, Hannah M Rowland, Kate D L Umbers","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arag047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deimatic behavior is an antipredator defense such as a sudden movement or sounds performed by prey upon perceiving a threat from a predator. Such behaviors can cause predators to slow or stop their attack, but how different components of deimatic behavior influence predator responses remains untested. We investigated the effect of prey movement, size, and size change on predator attack behavior using a robotic moth and wild Australian magpies (<i>Gymnorhina tibicen</i>) as predators. We first tested birds' responses to a nonmoving control moth and then presented them with a moving moth displaying deimatic behavior. The experiment included 3 different deimatic behavior treatments with the moving prey: a small moth, a large moth, and a moth that increased in size from small to large. We found that all deimatic behavior treatments were more effective at stopping the first approach compared with the nonmoving control moth, and that no treatment was more effective than another. There was no significant difference in attack latency among the treatments, although birds tended to attack the prey more quickly after the display when the moving prey remained small, compared with moving prey that increased in size during the movement. The robotic moth did not include warning colors or chemical defenses. Our results therefore indicate that protective value is conferred by movement alone, supporting the \"startle-first\" hypothesis that the behavioral component of deimatism can evolve before other defenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"37 4","pages":"arag047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13190295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arag047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deimatic behavior is an antipredator defense such as a sudden movement or sounds performed by prey upon perceiving a threat from a predator. Such behaviors can cause predators to slow or stop their attack, but how different components of deimatic behavior influence predator responses remains untested. We investigated the effect of prey movement, size, and size change on predator attack behavior using a robotic moth and wild Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) as predators. We first tested birds' responses to a nonmoving control moth and then presented them with a moving moth displaying deimatic behavior. The experiment included 3 different deimatic behavior treatments with the moving prey: a small moth, a large moth, and a moth that increased in size from small to large. We found that all deimatic behavior treatments were more effective at stopping the first approach compared with the nonmoving control moth, and that no treatment was more effective than another. There was no significant difference in attack latency among the treatments, although birds tended to attack the prey more quickly after the display when the moving prey remained small, compared with moving prey that increased in size during the movement. The robotic moth did not include warning colors or chemical defenses. Our results therefore indicate that protective value is conferred by movement alone, supporting the "startle-first" hypothesis that the behavioral component of deimatism can evolve before other defenses.

保护价值的大小和运动成分的震旦行为。
恐吓性行为是一种反捕食者的防御行为,如猎物在感知到来自捕食者的威胁时突然做出的动作或发出的声音。这些行为可以导致捕食者减缓或停止攻击,但如何不同的组成部分的毁灭行为影响捕食者的反应仍然没有测试。以机械飞蛾和野生澳洲喜鹊为研究对象,研究了猎物运动、大小和大小变化对捕食者攻击行为的影响。我们首先测试了鸟类对不移动的控制飞蛾的反应,然后给它们展示了一个移动的飞蛾表现出的行为。实验包括对移动猎物进行3种不同的吸血行为处理:小蛾、大蛾和由小变大的蛾。我们发现,与不移动的对照飞蛾相比,所有的飞蛾行为处理都更有效地阻止了第一种方法,并且没有一种处理比另一种处理更有效。不同处理之间的攻击潜伏期没有显著差异,尽管鸟类倾向于在展示后,当移动的猎物保持较小时,攻击猎物的速度比在移动过程中增加的移动猎物更快。这种机器飞蛾没有警告颜色或化学防御。因此,我们的研究结果表明,保护价值仅仅是由运动赋予的,这支持了“受惊优先”的假设,即神神论的行为成分可以在其他防御之前进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书