Advancing cardiac tumor diagnosis: evaluating 18F-FDG PET/CT against traditional imaging methods.

IF 1.4
American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2026-04-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/KEGM5869
Jalal Kargar, Farshad Riahi, Reza Gerami
{"title":"Advancing cardiac tumor diagnosis: evaluating <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT against traditional imaging methods.","authors":"Jalal Kargar, Farshad Riahi, Reza Gerami","doi":"10.62347/KEGM5869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac tumors are rare but clinically significant lesions requiring prompt and accurate diagnosis. While echocardiography remains the first-line imaging modality, it is limited by its inability to characterize tissue. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CT) offer superior anatomical detail but cannot reliably differentiate benign from malignant tumors. <sup>18</sup>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT) provides metabolic information that may overcome these limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review was conducted following a structured literature search covering January 2019 to September 2025. After screening 192 articles and applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 retrospective studies enrolling a total of 381 adult patients with newly diagnosed cardiac masses who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all included studies, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant cardiac and pericardial masses. Key quantitative metabolic parameters consistently outperformed traditional imaging modalities. Reported sensitivity and specificity ranged from 92-100% and 88-93%, respectively. In one study, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT achieved a 100% decision-making rate and the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 compared to transthoracic echocardiography, CT, and CMR. SUVmax also emerged as an independent predictor of survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plays a significant diagnostic and prognostic role in evaluating cardiac tumors, offering metabolic insights that complement conventional anatomical imaging. It should be incorporated as a key adjunct in the multimodality work-up of suspected cardiac masses, particularly when malignancy is suspected or biopsy is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":"16 2","pages":"80-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/KEGM5869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac tumors are rare but clinically significant lesions requiring prompt and accurate diagnosis. While echocardiography remains the first-line imaging modality, it is limited by its inability to characterize tissue. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CT) offer superior anatomical detail but cannot reliably differentiate benign from malignant tumors. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) provides metabolic information that may overcome these limitations.

Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted following a structured literature search covering January 2019 to September 2025. After screening 192 articles and applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 retrospective studies enrolling a total of 381 adult patients with newly diagnosed cardiac masses who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT were included.

Results: Across all included studies, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant cardiac and pericardial masses. Key quantitative metabolic parameters consistently outperformed traditional imaging modalities. Reported sensitivity and specificity ranged from 92-100% and 88-93%, respectively. In one study, 18F-FDG PET/CT achieved a 100% decision-making rate and the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 compared to transthoracic echocardiography, CT, and CMR. SUVmax also emerged as an independent predictor of survival.

Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT plays a significant diagnostic and prognostic role in evaluating cardiac tumors, offering metabolic insights that complement conventional anatomical imaging. It should be incorporated as a key adjunct in the multimodality work-up of suspected cardiac masses, particularly when malignancy is suspected or biopsy is not feasible.

推进心脏肿瘤诊断:18F-FDG PET/CT与传统成像方法的比较
背景:心脏肿瘤是一种罕见但临床意义重大的病变,需要及时准确的诊断。虽然超声心动图仍然是一线的成像方式,但它的局限性在于它无法表征组织。心血管磁共振成像(CMR)和心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)提供了优越的解剖细节,但不能可靠地区分良性和恶性肿瘤。18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET/CT)提供代谢信息,可以克服这些限制。方法:对2019年1月至2025年9月的结构化文献检索进行系统的范围综述。在对192篇文献进行筛选并应用预定义的纳入和排除标准后,纳入了7项回顾性研究,共纳入了381例新诊断为心脏肿块的成人患者,这些患者接受了18F-FDG PET/CT检查。结果:在所有纳入的研究中,18F-FDG PET/CT在区分心脏和心包肿块的良恶性方面表现出很高的诊断准确性。关键的定量代谢参数始终优于传统的成像方式。报告的敏感性和特异性分别为92-100%和88-93%。在一项研究中,与经胸超声心动图、CT和CMR相比,18F-FDG PET/CT的诊断率达到100%,曲线下面积(AUC)最高为0.94。SUVmax也成为生存的独立预测指标。结论:18F-FDG PET/CT在评估心脏肿瘤中具有重要的诊断和预后作用,提供了补充常规解剖成像的代谢见解。在疑似心脏肿块的多模式检查中,特别是当怀疑有恶性肿瘤或活检不可行时,应将其作为关键辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书