Mano dura: An experimental evaluation of military policing in Cali, Colombia

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
American Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2026-04-17 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1111/ajps.12977
Robert A. Blair, Lucía Mendoza-Mora, Michael Weintraub
{"title":"Mano dura: An experimental evaluation of military policing in Cali, Colombia","authors":"Robert A. Blair,&nbsp;Lucía Mendoza-Mora,&nbsp;Michael Weintraub","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Governments across the Global South rely on their militaries for domestic policing operations. We experimentally evaluate the social and political consequences of a military policing intervention in Cali, Colombia, one of the world's most violent cities. The intervention, <i>Plan Fortaleza</i>, involved recurring, intensive military patrols randomized at the city block level. Our evaluation combines administrative crime and human rights data, surveys of more than 10,000 residents, a conjoint experiment, a “costly” behavioral measure, and qualitative interviews with 49 civil society leaders. Despite null or adverse effects on crime and human rights, we show that <i>Plan Fortaleza</i> improved citizen’ attitudes toward the military and increased their demand for military involvement in domestic law enforcement. It also strengthened citizens’ support for extrajudicial punishment and—alarmingly—for military coups in response to rising crime, potentially signaling a diminished commitment to democracy and the rule of law among the program's intended beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48447,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Political Science","volume":"70 2","pages":"673-690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12977","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Governments across the Global South rely on their militaries for domestic policing operations. We experimentally evaluate the social and political consequences of a military policing intervention in Cali, Colombia, one of the world's most violent cities. The intervention, Plan Fortaleza, involved recurring, intensive military patrols randomized at the city block level. Our evaluation combines administrative crime and human rights data, surveys of more than 10,000 residents, a conjoint experiment, a “costly” behavioral measure, and qualitative interviews with 49 civil society leaders. Despite null or adverse effects on crime and human rights, we show that Plan Fortaleza improved citizen’ attitudes toward the military and increased their demand for military involvement in domestic law enforcement. It also strengthened citizens’ support for extrajudicial punishment and—alarmingly—for military coups in response to rising crime, potentially signaling a diminished commitment to democracy and the rule of law among the program's intended beneficiaries.

Mano dura:哥伦比亚卡利军事警察的实验评估
全球南方国家的政府依靠军队来维持国内治安。我们实验性地评估了在世界上最暴力的城市之一哥伦比亚卡利进行军事警务干预的社会和政治后果。福塔莱萨计划(Plan Fortaleza)的干预措施包括在城市街区随机进行经常性、密集的军事巡逻。我们的评估结合了行政犯罪和人权数据、对1万多名居民的调查、一项联合实验、一项“代价高昂”的行为测量,以及对49名公民社会领袖的定性访谈。尽管对犯罪和人权没有或不利的影响,我们表明福塔莱萨计划改善了公民对军队的态度,并增加了他们对军队参与国内执法的需求。它还加强了公民对法外惩罚的支持,令人担忧的是,还加强了对军事政变的支持,以应对不断上升的犯罪,这可能表明,该计划的预期受益者对民主和法治的承诺有所减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) publishes research in all major areas of political science including American politics, public policy, international relations, comparative politics, political methodology, and political theory. Founded in 1956, the AJPS publishes articles that make outstanding contributions to scholarly knowledge about notable theoretical concerns, puzzles or controversies in any subfield of political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书