Anticipating data sharing for student-centred education: Governmental policy initiatives in Switzerland and Japan

IF 13 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2026-04-19 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1111/bjet.70030
Judith Hangartner, Yuko Toyokawa, María Guadalupe Ramírez
{"title":"Anticipating data sharing for student-centred education: Governmental policy initiatives in Switzerland and Japan","authors":"Judith Hangartner,&nbsp;Yuko Toyokawa,&nbsp;María Guadalupe Ramírez","doi":"10.1111/bjet.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>In the context of digital transformation and platformisation of education, policy concerns are shifting from infrastructure to data use. New governmental initiatives attempt to facilitate data sharing between schools, research and governing authorities to improve student learning. These attempts to create public data spaces anticipate new topologies of data-based governance that strengthen the data-based exchange between classrooms and system governance. However, educational research has paid little attention to these initiatives towards public data spaces. This article addresses this gap by examining such initiatives in Switzerland and Japan, exploring how policy documents envision data-driven educational futures. While both promote student-centred education through personalised and individualised learning, they reveal culturally specific ambivalences around this focus on individual learning. These cases point not only to the unresolved technical and regulatory challenges of the data sharing plans but also to controversies regarding what kind of education such data are meant to support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Educational practices, including those in primary and secondary schools, are increasingly situated within commercial platform infrastructures that extract and capitalise data from teaching and learning activities.</li>\n \n <li>Platforms are promoted to improve education by providing personalised learning tailored to individual learners' needs.</li>\n \n <li>Proprietary data infrastructures in public education raise significant ethical concerns, including concerns about data protection, infringements of student privacy and the commodification of educational data.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>National governments develop policy initiatives to enable data sharing among schools, researchers, administrators and policymakers within trustworthy public data spaces.</li>\n \n <li>These initiatives are not only concerned with technical standards and questions of regulation that allow data sharing across institutional boundaries but also encompass guiding visions of future education.</li>\n \n <li>This paper analyses the emerging data-sharing governmental initiatives in Switzerland and Japan and examines the visions of future education they articulate.</li>\n \n <li>In both countries, the initiatives reproduce the commercial platforms' promises to improve education through personalisation and individualisation, while expressing culturally distinct and ambivalent understandings of these student-centred approaches.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>In the context of the increasing platformisation of education, digital data have become central to informing, guiding and governing educational practices at all levels.</li>\n \n <li>The proposed data spaces could provide mechanisms for creating public value from data generated in public education, which is currently predominantly monetised by commercial platforms in primary and secondary schools.</li>\n \n <li>While technical and governance challenges are crucial, policymakers should also consider the educational aims and pedagogical visions that data infrastructures should advance.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"57 3","pages":"655-673"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.70030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of digital transformation and platformisation of education, policy concerns are shifting from infrastructure to data use. New governmental initiatives attempt to facilitate data sharing between schools, research and governing authorities to improve student learning. These attempts to create public data spaces anticipate new topologies of data-based governance that strengthen the data-based exchange between classrooms and system governance. However, educational research has paid little attention to these initiatives towards public data spaces. This article addresses this gap by examining such initiatives in Switzerland and Japan, exploring how policy documents envision data-driven educational futures. While both promote student-centred education through personalised and individualised learning, they reveal culturally specific ambivalences around this focus on individual learning. These cases point not only to the unresolved technical and regulatory challenges of the data sharing plans but also to controversies regarding what kind of education such data are meant to support.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic?

  • Educational practices, including those in primary and secondary schools, are increasingly situated within commercial platform infrastructures that extract and capitalise data from teaching and learning activities.
  • Platforms are promoted to improve education by providing personalised learning tailored to individual learners' needs.
  • Proprietary data infrastructures in public education raise significant ethical concerns, including concerns about data protection, infringements of student privacy and the commodification of educational data.

What this paper adds?

  • National governments develop policy initiatives to enable data sharing among schools, researchers, administrators and policymakers within trustworthy public data spaces.
  • These initiatives are not only concerned with technical standards and questions of regulation that allow data sharing across institutional boundaries but also encompass guiding visions of future education.
  • This paper analyses the emerging data-sharing governmental initiatives in Switzerland and Japan and examines the visions of future education they articulate.
  • In both countries, the initiatives reproduce the commercial platforms' promises to improve education through personalisation and individualisation, while expressing culturally distinct and ambivalent understandings of these student-centred approaches.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • In the context of the increasing platformisation of education, digital data have become central to informing, guiding and governing educational practices at all levels.
  • The proposed data spaces could provide mechanisms for creating public value from data generated in public education, which is currently predominantly monetised by commercial platforms in primary and secondary schools.
  • While technical and governance challenges are crucial, policymakers should also consider the educational aims and pedagogical visions that data infrastructures should advance.
预测以学生为中心的教育的数据共享:瑞士和日本的政府政策举措
在教育数字化转型和平台化的背景下,政策关注点正从基础设施转向数据使用。新的政府举措试图促进学校、研究机构和管理当局之间的数据共享,以改善学生的学习。这些创建公共数据空间的尝试预测了基于数据的治理的新拓扑,从而加强了教室和系统治理之间基于数据的交换。然而,教育研究很少关注这些面向公共数据空间的举措。本文通过研究瑞士和日本的此类举措,探讨政策文件如何设想数据驱动的教育未来,从而解决这一差距。虽然两者都通过个性化和个性化学习来促进以学生为中心的教育,但它们揭示了围绕这种关注个人学习的文化特定矛盾。这些案例不仅指出了数据共享计划中尚未解决的技术和监管挑战,而且还指出了关于这些数据意味着支持哪种教育的争议。关于这个主题我们已经知道了什么?教育实践,包括中小学的教育实践,越来越多地位于商业平台基础设施中,从教学活动中提取和利用数据。促进平台通过提供个性化学习来改善教育,以满足个人学习者的需求。公共教育中的专有数据基础设施引发了重大的伦理问题,包括对数据保护、侵犯学生隐私和教育数据商品化的担忧。这篇文章补充了什么?各国政府制定政策举措,使学校、研究人员、管理人员和政策制定者能够在可信赖的公共数据空间内共享数据。这些举措不仅涉及技术标准和允许跨机构边界数据共享的监管问题,而且还包括对未来教育的指导性愿景。本文分析了瑞士和日本正在兴起的数据共享政府举措,并考察了它们所阐述的未来教育愿景。在这两个国家,这些举措再现了商业平台通过个性化和个性化改善教育的承诺,同时表达了对这些以学生为中心的方法的文化差异和矛盾的理解。在教育日益平台化的背景下,数字数据已成为各级教育实践信息、指导和管理的核心。拟议的数据空间可以提供从公共教育中产生的数据创造公共价值的机制,目前这些数据主要由中小学的商业平台货币化。虽然技术和治理挑战至关重要,但政策制定者还应考虑数据基础设施应该推进的教育目标和教学愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书