Childhood in Quarantine: A Qualitative Dyadic Study of Children’s Experiences of Uncertainty, Disruption, and Adaptation

IF 2.1
Yijun Zhao
{"title":"Childhood in Quarantine: A Qualitative Dyadic Study of Children’s Experiences of Uncertainty, Disruption, and Adaptation","authors":"Yijun Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s42844-026-00227-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This qualitative study examines how children aged 8–12 went through and interpreted the COVID-19 pandemic within family contexts. By integrating both parents and children into the study, it aims to collaborate on parent–child narratives to present a landscape that captures the full picture of what really happened to children during the sensitive period of the pandemic, both physically and mentally. While prior research has largely focused on psychological statistics and relied primarily on parent-reported data, less is known about children’s subjective voices and illustrated divergence within the family context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 parent–child dyads in the United Kingdom between mid-2021 and early 2022. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis with an explicit dyadic analytic component. The following emergent themes were generated while answering the research questions to get a detailed understanding of children’s experience: (1) living with Chronic Uncertainty as a Persistent Psychological Condition; (2) reconfiguration of developmental contexts under confinement; (3) reconstruction of Relational Values and Social Meaning; and (4) parent–child divergence in Meaning-Making and Emotional Interpretation. Specifically, the dyadic comparison showed that parents were able to identify children’s behavioural signs of distress, but they might partially overlook these signs and sometimes attribute them to children’s personality and developmental factors, or might overly highlight children’s growth without recognising their deep concerns. Parent-child discrepancies reflect distinct interpretive perspectives, highlighting the importance of examining children’s experiences of adversity and adaptation within family systems during prolonged crises. This study emphasises the importance of involving multiple sources to uncover children’s experiences, while also highlighting the need to interpret the family system for future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-026-00227-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study examines how children aged 8–12 went through and interpreted the COVID-19 pandemic within family contexts. By integrating both parents and children into the study, it aims to collaborate on parent–child narratives to present a landscape that captures the full picture of what really happened to children during the sensitive period of the pandemic, both physically and mentally. While prior research has largely focused on psychological statistics and relied primarily on parent-reported data, less is known about children’s subjective voices and illustrated divergence within the family context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 parent–child dyads in the United Kingdom between mid-2021 and early 2022. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis with an explicit dyadic analytic component. The following emergent themes were generated while answering the research questions to get a detailed understanding of children’s experience: (1) living with Chronic Uncertainty as a Persistent Psychological Condition; (2) reconfiguration of developmental contexts under confinement; (3) reconstruction of Relational Values and Social Meaning; and (4) parent–child divergence in Meaning-Making and Emotional Interpretation. Specifically, the dyadic comparison showed that parents were able to identify children’s behavioural signs of distress, but they might partially overlook these signs and sometimes attribute them to children’s personality and developmental factors, or might overly highlight children’s growth without recognising their deep concerns. Parent-child discrepancies reflect distinct interpretive perspectives, highlighting the importance of examining children’s experiences of adversity and adaptation within family systems during prolonged crises. This study emphasises the importance of involving multiple sources to uncover children’s experiences, while also highlighting the need to interpret the family system for future studies.

隔离中的童年:儿童不确定、中断和适应经历的定性二元研究
本定性研究探讨了8-12岁儿童在家庭背景下如何经历和解释COVID-19大流行。通过将父母和儿童纳入研究,它旨在合作进行亲子叙事,以呈现一幅全景,全面了解在大流行的敏感时期,儿童在身体和精神上真正发生了什么。虽然之前的研究主要集中在心理统计上,主要依赖于父母报告的数据,但对儿童的主观声音和家庭背景下的差异知之甚少。在2021年年中至2022年初期间,对英国的11对亲子进行了半结构化访谈。数据分析使用反身主题分析与明确的二元分析成分。在回答研究问题时,产生了以下紧急主题,以详细了解儿童的经历:(1)长期生活在慢性不确定性中;(2)禁闭条件下发育环境的重构;(3)关系价值与社会意义的重构;(4)亲子在意义制造和情感解释上的差异。具体地说,二元对比表明,父母能够识别孩子的痛苦行为迹象,但他们可能部分忽视了这些迹象,有时将其归因于孩子的个性和发展因素,或者可能过度强调孩子的成长,而没有意识到他们的深层担忧。亲子差异反映了不同的解释视角,突出了在长期危机期间审查儿童在家庭系统内的逆境和适应经历的重要性。这项研究强调了涉及多种来源来揭示儿童经历的重要性,同时也强调了为未来研究解释家庭系统的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书