Should we prioritize proton beam therapy before making a decision on orthotopic liver transplantation for unresectable hepatoblastoma?

Yi-Wen Hsiao, Yi-Lun Wang, Chen-Kan Tseng, Tsung-Yen Chang, Shih-Hsiang Chen, Tang-Her Jaing
{"title":"Should we prioritize proton beam therapy before making a decision on orthotopic liver transplantation for unresectable hepatoblastoma?","authors":"Yi-Wen Hsiao, Yi-Lun Wang, Chen-Kan Tseng, Tsung-Yen Chang, Shih-Hsiang Chen, Tang-Her Jaing","doi":"10.24953/turkjpediatr.2026.6426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In unresectable hepatoblastoma (HB), particularly \"pre-treatment extent of tumor\" (PRETEXT) IV tumors or those with positive annotation factors, standard management consists of intensive chemotherapy followed by surgical resection or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Radiotherapy has traditionally been avoided because of the liver's radiosensitivity and the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. Proton beam therapy (PBT), owing to its dosimetric advantage and ability to spare uninvolved liver parenchyma, may represent a potential local control strategy in selected pediatric patients for whom curative surgery or OLT is not feasible.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We describe five pediatric patients with advanced hepatoblastoma treated with proton beam therapy at our institution between February 2022 and January 2024. The cohort included three girls and two boys, with a median age of 3.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-4.0) and a median alpha-fetoprotein level of 435,453 ng/mL (IQR: 7,668-1,276,681) at diagnosis. All patients were initially considered inoperable because of extensive hepatic involvement, inadequate future liver remnant, or multifocal disease, and OLT was not feasible owing to donor limitations or medical comorbidities. All received neoadjuvant chemotherapy using SIOPEL-based regimens, achieving partial tumor response. Tumors ranged from 5 to 12 cm and involved central hepatic segments, the portal region, or both lobes. PBT was delivered at a total dose of 50 GyE in 10-25 fractions as definitive or consolidative therapy, followed by surgical resection in three patients. Two patients additionally received targeted therapy and immunotherapy. At last follow-up, four patients were alive with no evidence of disease, while one patient died from tumor progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These cases suggest that proton beam therapy may serve as a feasible liver-sparing local treatment option for selected pediatric patients with unresectable or residual hepatoblastoma when surgery or OLT is not possible. While limited by availability and cost, PBT may facilitate multimodal therapy and preserve future treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":101314,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","volume":"68 2","pages":"324-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2026.6426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In unresectable hepatoblastoma (HB), particularly "pre-treatment extent of tumor" (PRETEXT) IV tumors or those with positive annotation factors, standard management consists of intensive chemotherapy followed by surgical resection or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Radiotherapy has traditionally been avoided because of the liver's radiosensitivity and the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. Proton beam therapy (PBT), owing to its dosimetric advantage and ability to spare uninvolved liver parenchyma, may represent a potential local control strategy in selected pediatric patients for whom curative surgery or OLT is not feasible.

Case presentation: We describe five pediatric patients with advanced hepatoblastoma treated with proton beam therapy at our institution between February 2022 and January 2024. The cohort included three girls and two boys, with a median age of 3.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-4.0) and a median alpha-fetoprotein level of 435,453 ng/mL (IQR: 7,668-1,276,681) at diagnosis. All patients were initially considered inoperable because of extensive hepatic involvement, inadequate future liver remnant, or multifocal disease, and OLT was not feasible owing to donor limitations or medical comorbidities. All received neoadjuvant chemotherapy using SIOPEL-based regimens, achieving partial tumor response. Tumors ranged from 5 to 12 cm and involved central hepatic segments, the portal region, or both lobes. PBT was delivered at a total dose of 50 GyE in 10-25 fractions as definitive or consolidative therapy, followed by surgical resection in three patients. Two patients additionally received targeted therapy and immunotherapy. At last follow-up, four patients were alive with no evidence of disease, while one patient died from tumor progression.

Conclusions: These cases suggest that proton beam therapy may serve as a feasible liver-sparing local treatment option for selected pediatric patients with unresectable or residual hepatoblastoma when surgery or OLT is not possible. While limited by availability and cost, PBT may facilitate multimodal therapy and preserve future treatment options.

对于不能切除的肝母细胞瘤,在决定原位肝移植前,我们是否应该优先考虑质子束治疗?
背景:对于不可切除的肝母细胞瘤(HB),特别是“肿瘤治疗前范围”(托词)IV肿瘤或具有阳性标记因子的肿瘤,标准治疗包括强化化疗后手术切除或原位肝移植(OLT)。由于肝脏的放射敏感性和辐射引起的肝脏疾病的风险,传统上避免放射治疗。质子束治疗(PBT),由于其剂量学上的优势和能够避免未受损伤的肝实质,可能代表了一种潜在的局部控制策略,用于治疗性手术或OLT不可行的儿童患者。病例介绍:我们描述了2022年2月至2024年1月在我们机构接受质子束治疗的5例晚期肝母细胞瘤儿科患者。该队列包括3名女孩和2名男孩,诊断时中位年龄为3.0岁(四分位数范围[IQR], 1.6-4.0),中位甲胎蛋白水平为435,453 ng/mL (IQR: 7,668-1,276,681)。所有患者最初都被认为不能手术,因为肝脏广泛受累,未来肝脏残余不足,或多灶性疾病,并且由于供体限制或医学合并症,OLT不可行。所有患者均接受了基于siopel方案的新辅助化疗,实现了部分肿瘤缓解。肿瘤范围5 ~ 12cm,累及肝中央节段、门静脉区或双叶。PBT总剂量为50 GyE,分10-25份作为最终或巩固治疗,随后有3例患者手术切除。2例患者同时接受靶向治疗和免疫治疗。在最后的随访中,4名患者存活,无疾病迹象,而1名患者死于肿瘤进展。结论:这些病例提示,对于不能切除或残留肝母细胞瘤的儿童患者,质子束治疗可能是一种可行的保肝局部治疗选择。虽然受可用性和成本的限制,PBT可能促进多模式治疗,并保留未来的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书