Development and validation of the OH-KAP survey for use with pastoral and other rural communities in Africa.

IF 5.9 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Farah I Mumin, Siobhan M Mor
{"title":"Development and validation of the OH-KAP survey for use with pastoral and other rural communities in Africa.","authors":"Farah I Mumin, Siobhan M Mor","doi":"10.1186/s42522-026-00213-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating One Health at community-level requires robust, valid measures of what communities know, believe, and do about health risks shared by people, animals, and the environment. This study aimed to develop and validate a One Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (OH-KAP) instrument tailored to (agro-)pastoralist and mixed-farming systems in Africa, covering key One Health topics including zoonoses, antimicrobial resistance, and food safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial pool of 156 items was derived from the literature and refined through expert content validation to 126 items. Subsequently, the questionnaire was translated into Somali and field-tested with 300 adults in Middle Shabelle, Somalia. Psychometric analysis of knowledge and attitudes items was undertaken using classical test theory, exploratory factor analysis, and bifactor item response theory (2-parameter logistic models for binary knowledge items; graded response models for Likert-scale attitudes items). Practice items were analysed using exploratory graph analysis and community detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final instrument included 27 knowledge, 19 attitude and 29 practice items. The knowledge sub-scale loaded onto a general One Health factor with 4 domain-specific subfactors: zoonotic transmission and environmental risks; animal bites and safe food handling; AMR; and direct contact and food contamination risks (reliability: α = 0.94; model fit: CFI = 0.96, RMSEA 0.08). The attitudes sub-domain loaded onto a general One Health factor with 5 domain-specific subfactors: hand hygiene; animal husbandry; zoonotic outbreaks; AMR; and antimicrobial use (AMU) (α = 0.93; CFI = 0.99, RMSEA 0.05). Practices clustered into four stable domains: animal management and AMU; direct contact and exposure control; responsible husbandry, food safety and stewardship; and hand hygiene and disease reporting (bootstrap stability > 65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed OH-KAP is a concise, field-ready tool for quantifying integrated One Health knowledge, attitudes and practices. It supports baseline assessments and monitoring associated with awareness-creation and behaviour-change programming. Future work should extend coverage to additional One Health priorities and assess invariance across settings and languages.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13404092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One health outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-026-00213-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating One Health at community-level requires robust, valid measures of what communities know, believe, and do about health risks shared by people, animals, and the environment. This study aimed to develop and validate a One Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (OH-KAP) instrument tailored to (agro-)pastoralist and mixed-farming systems in Africa, covering key One Health topics including zoonoses, antimicrobial resistance, and food safety.

Methods: An initial pool of 156 items was derived from the literature and refined through expert content validation to 126 items. Subsequently, the questionnaire was translated into Somali and field-tested with 300 adults in Middle Shabelle, Somalia. Psychometric analysis of knowledge and attitudes items was undertaken using classical test theory, exploratory factor analysis, and bifactor item response theory (2-parameter logistic models for binary knowledge items; graded response models for Likert-scale attitudes items). Practice items were analysed using exploratory graph analysis and community detection.

Results: The final instrument included 27 knowledge, 19 attitude and 29 practice items. The knowledge sub-scale loaded onto a general One Health factor with 4 domain-specific subfactors: zoonotic transmission and environmental risks; animal bites and safe food handling; AMR; and direct contact and food contamination risks (reliability: α = 0.94; model fit: CFI = 0.96, RMSEA 0.08). The attitudes sub-domain loaded onto a general One Health factor with 5 domain-specific subfactors: hand hygiene; animal husbandry; zoonotic outbreaks; AMR; and antimicrobial use (AMU) (α = 0.93; CFI = 0.99, RMSEA 0.05). Practices clustered into four stable domains: animal management and AMU; direct contact and exposure control; responsible husbandry, food safety and stewardship; and hand hygiene and disease reporting (bootstrap stability > 65%).

Conclusions: The developed OH-KAP is a concise, field-ready tool for quantifying integrated One Health knowledge, attitudes and practices. It supports baseline assessments and monitoring associated with awareness-creation and behaviour-change programming. Future work should extend coverage to additional One Health priorities and assess invariance across settings and languages.

开发和验证用于非洲牧区和其他农村社区的OH-KAP调查。
背景:在社区层面评估“一种健康”需要对社区对人、动物和环境共有的健康风险所知、所信和所做的情况采取有力、有效的措施。本研究旨在开发和验证为非洲(农业)牧民和混合农业系统定制的“同一健康”知识、态度和实践(OH-KAP)工具,涵盖人畜共患病、抗菌素耐药性和食品安全等“同一健康”关键主题。方法:从文献中提取156个条目,经过专家内容验证,提炼为126个条目。随后,问卷被翻译成索马里语,并在索马里中谢贝利对300名成年人进行实地测试。知识和态度项目的心理测量分析采用经典测试理论、探索性因子分析和双因素项目反应理论(二元知识项目采用2参数逻辑模型,李克特态度项目采用分级反应模型)。采用探索性图分析和社区检测对实践项目进行分析。结果:终量表包括27个知识项目、19个态度项目和29个实践项目。知识子量表加载到一般的一个健康因素上,有4个特定领域的子因素:人畜共患病传播和环境风险;动物咬伤和安全食品处理;AMR;直接接触和食品污染风险(信度:α = 0.94;模型拟合:CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.08)。态度子域加载到一般的一个健康因子上,包含5个特定域的子因子:手卫生;畜牧业;动物传染病的爆发;AMR;抗菌药物使用(AMU) (α = 0.93; CFI = 0.99, RMSEA 0.05)。实践集中在四个稳定的领域:动物管理和AMU;直接接触和暴露控制;负责任的畜牧业、食品安全和管理;手卫生和疾病报告(bootstrap稳定性> 65%)。结论:开发的OH-KAP是一种简明的、现场准备的工具,用于量化综合One Health的知识、态度和实践。它支持与提高认识和行为改变规划相关的基线评估和监测。未来的工作应将覆盖范围扩大到其他“同一个健康”优先事项,并评估不同环境和语言之间的不变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书