Computed tomography–based prediction of ureteroscopic failure in impacted ureteral stones: A focus on stone volume and ureteral anatomy

Actas urologicas espanolas Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.501992
M. Dinckal, K.E. Ergun, A. Akyol, M.S. Kalemci, A. Simsir, A.B. Altay, F. Kizilay
{"title":"Computed tomography–based prediction of ureteroscopic failure in impacted ureteral stones: A focus on stone volume and ureteral anatomy","authors":"M. Dinckal,&nbsp;K.E. Ergun,&nbsp;A. Akyol,&nbsp;M.S. Kalemci,&nbsp;A. Simsir,&nbsp;A.B. Altay,&nbsp;F. Kizilay","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.501992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Impacted ureteral stones are associated with lower ureteroscopic success and increased procedural complexity. Although ureteroscopy is the standard treatment, reliable preoperative predictors of failure are limited, and decision-making often depends on intraoperative findings. This study evaluated the association between preoperative CT-based stone and ureteral anatomical parameters and ureteroscopic failure among patients with endoscopically confirmed impacted ureteral calculi.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed 123 patients with impacted ureteral calculi who underwent URS. Preoperative non-contrast computed tomography images were evaluated for stone characteristics, ureteral wall thickness (UWT), and ureteral anatomical features, including kinking. URS success was defined as stone-free status after the initial procedure, and the predictive value of CT parameters was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall URS success rate was 68.3%. In univariate analysis, stone volume, proximal kink width, and proximal kink length were significantly larger in the failed group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified stone volume as the sole independent predictor of URS failure (OR: 3.05; 95% CI: 1.06–8.78; <em>P</em> = .039). A stone volume ≥ 451.28 mm³ demonstrated modest predictive power (AUC = 0.615). Although proximal kink parameters showed promising results in univariate analysis and ROC curves, these associations were not independent of other factors. UWT showed no significant differences between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stone volume is the only independent predictor of ureteroscopic failure in impacted ureteral stones, while ureteral anatomy may provide complementary information regarding procedural complexity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"50 6","pages":"Article 501992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578626001022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Impacted ureteral stones are associated with lower ureteroscopic success and increased procedural complexity. Although ureteroscopy is the standard treatment, reliable preoperative predictors of failure are limited, and decision-making often depends on intraoperative findings. This study evaluated the association between preoperative CT-based stone and ureteral anatomical parameters and ureteroscopic failure among patients with endoscopically confirmed impacted ureteral calculi.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 123 patients with impacted ureteral calculi who underwent URS. Preoperative non-contrast computed tomography images were evaluated for stone characteristics, ureteral wall thickness (UWT), and ureteral anatomical features, including kinking. URS success was defined as stone-free status after the initial procedure, and the predictive value of CT parameters was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

The overall URS success rate was 68.3%. In univariate analysis, stone volume, proximal kink width, and proximal kink length were significantly larger in the failed group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified stone volume as the sole independent predictor of URS failure (OR: 3.05; 95% CI: 1.06–8.78; P = .039). A stone volume ≥ 451.28 mm³ demonstrated modest predictive power (AUC = 0.615). Although proximal kink parameters showed promising results in univariate analysis and ROC curves, these associations were not independent of other factors. UWT showed no significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions

Stone volume is the only independent predictor of ureteroscopic failure in impacted ureteral stones, while ureteral anatomy may provide complementary information regarding procedural complexity.

Abstract Image

基于计算机断层扫描的输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石失败的预测:聚焦于结石体积和输尿管解剖。
梗阻输尿管结石与输尿管镜成功率低和手术复杂性增加有关。虽然输尿管镜检查是标准的治疗方法,但术前预测失败的可靠因素是有限的,决策往往取决于术中发现。本研究评估术前ct结石和输尿管解剖参数与内窥镜确认的阻生输尿管结石患者输尿管镜失败的关系。方法:回顾性分析123例行泌尿系输尿管结石的患者。术前非对比计算机断层扫描图像评估结石特征、输尿管壁厚度(UWT)和输尿管解剖特征,包括扭结。URS成功被定义为初始手术后无结石状态,并通过接受者工作特征分析和单因素和多因素logistic回归模型评估CT参数的预测价值。结果:URS总成功率为68.3%。在单变量分析中,失败组的结石体积、近端扭结宽度和近端扭结长度明显更大。多因素logistic回归分析发现,结石体积是尿潴留失败的唯一独立预测因子(OR: 3.05; 95% CI: 1.06-8.78; p = 0.039)。当结石体积≥451.28 mm³时,预测能力一般(AUC = 0.615)。虽然近端扭结参数在单因素分析和ROC曲线中显示出良好的结果,但这些关联并不是独立于其他因素的。UWT组间无显著差异。结论:结石体积是影响输尿管结石输尿管镜手术失败的唯一独立预测因素,而输尿管解剖学可能提供有关手术复杂性的补充信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书