Prospective randomized evaluation of patient- and physician-reported pain concordance in flexible cystoscopy: impact of experience and anxiety

Actas urologicas espanolas Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.501982
G. Ozgur, C. Ozdemiroglu, M. Kars, Y. Senoglu, H.K. Cam
{"title":"Prospective randomized evaluation of patient- and physician-reported pain concordance in flexible cystoscopy: impact of experience and anxiety","authors":"G. Ozgur,&nbsp;C. Ozdemiroglu,&nbsp;M. Kars,&nbsp;Y. Senoglu,&nbsp;H.K. Cam","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.501982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Flexible cystoscopy is commonly performed under local anesthesia. This study explores the effects of pre-procedural anxiety, depression, and physician experience on both patient pain and the physician's perception of it.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective, randomized study included 120 male patients (≥18 years), scheduled for flexible cystoscopy under intraurethral 2% lidocaine. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups based on the experience level of the physician. Pain perception was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while pre-procedural anxiety and depression were measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Postoperative VAS-pain scores were slightly higher than preoperative values (2 vs. 1.5; p &lt; 0.001), but this difference was considered clinically negligible due to the overall low pain levels observed. Although doctors tended to underestimate patients' pain, a correlation was observed between patient- and physician-reported postoperative VAS-pain (r = 0.487, p &lt; 0.01). Physician experience did not significantly affect pain perception (p = 0.585). Interestingly, although the differences in VAS-scores are not clinically important, the correlation analysis revealed that less experienced physicians -residents- demonstrated a stronger concordance between their perception of patient pain and the patients’ self-reported pain (r = 0.798 and r = 0.633). HADS-anxiety scores correlated positively with both preoperative and postoperative pain and anxiety levels (r = 0.194–0.404, p &lt; 0.05), while HADS-depression showed no association.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Flexible cystoscopy performed under local anesthesia is a well-tolerated procedure, irrespective of the physician’s level of experience. The correlation between patient and physician pain scores suggests that physicians can reliably assess patient discomfort. Managing preoperative anxiety is essential to enhance patient comfort during the procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"50 7","pages":"Article 501982"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578626001009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Flexible cystoscopy is commonly performed under local anesthesia. This study explores the effects of pre-procedural anxiety, depression, and physician experience on both patient pain and the physician's perception of it.

Methods

This prospective, randomized study included 120 male patients (≥18 years), scheduled for flexible cystoscopy under intraurethral 2% lidocaine. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups based on the experience level of the physician. Pain perception was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while pre-procedural anxiety and depression were measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale.

Results

Postoperative VAS-pain scores were slightly higher than preoperative values (2 vs. 1.5; p < 0.001), but this difference was considered clinically negligible due to the overall low pain levels observed. Although doctors tended to underestimate patients' pain, a correlation was observed between patient- and physician-reported postoperative VAS-pain (r = 0.487, p < 0.01). Physician experience did not significantly affect pain perception (p = 0.585). Interestingly, although the differences in VAS-scores are not clinically important, the correlation analysis revealed that less experienced physicians -residents- demonstrated a stronger concordance between their perception of patient pain and the patients’ self-reported pain (r = 0.798 and r = 0.633). HADS-anxiety scores correlated positively with both preoperative and postoperative pain and anxiety levels (r = 0.194–0.404, p < 0.05), while HADS-depression showed no association.

Conclusion

Flexible cystoscopy performed under local anesthesia is a well-tolerated procedure, irrespective of the physician’s level of experience. The correlation between patient and physician pain scores suggests that physicians can reliably assess patient discomfort. Managing preoperative anxiety is essential to enhance patient comfort during the procedure.
柔性膀胱镜检查中患者和医生报告的疼痛一致性的前瞻性随机评价:经验和焦虑的影响。
简介:软性膀胱镜检查通常在局部麻醉下进行。本研究探讨手术前焦虑、抑郁和医生经验对患者疼痛和医生对疼痛的感知的影响。方法:这项前瞻性、随机研究纳入120例男性患者(≥18岁),计划在2%利多卡因下行尿道软性膀胱镜检查。根据医生的经验水平,将患者随机分为四组。疼痛感知采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估,手术前焦虑和抑郁采用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HAD)测量。结果:术后VAS-pain评分略高于术前值(2 vs. 1.5); p结论:无论医生的经验水平如何,在局麻下进行柔性膀胱镜检查是一种耐受良好的手术。病人和医生疼痛评分之间的相关性表明医生可以可靠地评估病人的不适。管理术前焦虑是必不可少的,以提高病人在手术过程中的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书