Practical wisdom in medicine: defending a multidimensional, integrated view of an indispensable virtue.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s11017-026-09760-7
Lauris C Kaldjian, Kristján Kristjánsson, Shane McLoughlin
{"title":"Practical wisdom in medicine: defending a multidimensional, integrated view of an indispensable virtue.","authors":"Lauris C Kaldjian, Kristján Kristjánsson, Shane McLoughlin","doi":"10.1007/s11017-026-09760-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By defending practical wisdom (phronesis) as a multidimensional virtue that complements the moral virtues, we offer a critique of \"practical wisdom eliminativism\", with special attention to the context of medicine, arguing that the core dimensions of practical wisdom enjoy broad consensus. As the meta-virtue that demonstrates excellence in ethical decision-making, practical wisdom recognizes and employs the best means to achieve good and worthwhile ends by integrating goals, perception of context, moral virtues, deliberation, reason-guided emotion, and motivation. In medicine, practical wisdom encompasses patient-centered deliberation directed toward ends of health and flourishing that promote the patient's good. To counter the notion that practical wisdom is a redundant concept (the eliminativist view), we provide philosophical arguments, evidence from medical practitioners, and psychometric data from a detailed empirical study of US and UK adults. Practical wisdom has survived for more than 2300 years as a unified and unifying intellectual meta-virtue that guides the moral virtues. We believe the reasons we put forward explain why phronesis should be expected to endure as a meaningful, multidimensional concept reflecting the nature of moral deliberation in response to practical challenges in life and medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"465-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-026-09760-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By defending practical wisdom (phronesis) as a multidimensional virtue that complements the moral virtues, we offer a critique of "practical wisdom eliminativism", with special attention to the context of medicine, arguing that the core dimensions of practical wisdom enjoy broad consensus. As the meta-virtue that demonstrates excellence in ethical decision-making, practical wisdom recognizes and employs the best means to achieve good and worthwhile ends by integrating goals, perception of context, moral virtues, deliberation, reason-guided emotion, and motivation. In medicine, practical wisdom encompasses patient-centered deliberation directed toward ends of health and flourishing that promote the patient's good. To counter the notion that practical wisdom is a redundant concept (the eliminativist view), we provide philosophical arguments, evidence from medical practitioners, and psychometric data from a detailed empirical study of US and UK adults. Practical wisdom has survived for more than 2300 years as a unified and unifying intellectual meta-virtue that guides the moral virtues. We believe the reasons we put forward explain why phronesis should be expected to endure as a meaningful, multidimensional concept reflecting the nature of moral deliberation in response to practical challenges in life and medicine.

医学中的实用智慧:捍卫一种不可或缺的美德的多维的、综合的观点。
通过捍卫实践智慧(phronesis)作为一种补充道德美德的多维美德,我们对“实践智慧消除主义”提出了批评,特别关注医学背景,认为实践智慧的核心维度享有广泛共识。作为在伦理决策中表现卓越的元美德,实践智慧通过整合目标、对环境的感知、道德美德、深思熟虑、理性引导的情感和动机,识别并采用最佳手段来实现良好和有价值的目标。在医学上,实践智慧包括以病人为中心的思考,旨在促进病人的健康和繁荣。为了反驳实践智慧是一个冗余概念(消除主义观点)的观点,我们提供了哲学论证、来自医疗从业者的证据以及来自美国和英国成年人的详细实证研究的心理测量数据。实践智慧作为一种统一的、统一的、指导道德美德的智力元美德,已经存在了2300多年。我们认为,我们提出的理由解释了为什么phronesis应该被期望作为一个有意义的、多维的概念而存在,反映了在应对生活和医学中的实际挑战时道德审议的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书