Rachel E. Lovell PhD, Mary C. Weston JD, Duoduo Huang MS
{"title":"From 15,000 to near zero: Cuyahoga County's eight-year effort to address lawfully “owed” DNA","authors":"Rachel E. Lovell PhD, Mary C. Weston JD, Duoduo Huang MS","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents the final outcomes of an eight-year, countywide initiative to address “lawfully owed” DNA (LODNA) among individuals who should have had a DNA sample in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) following a qualifying arrest or conviction but did not. Building on prior research in this jurisdiction, this study evaluates the effectiveness of policies and practices in identifying, collecting, and uploading LODNA samples to CODIS. Using a comprehensive list of 14,920 individuals confirmed to have LODNA (“census”), we assessed outcomes, lessons learned, and remaining issues in the DNA sample collection process. By the end of the funded initiative, 25.5% (<i>n</i> = 3802) of “census members” (the 14,920 individuals on our census) were confirmed to be in CODIS, including 641 collected directly through an enacted prosecutor-initiated arraignment policy. DNA sample collection improved substantially over time. Results indicated that missed collections were reduced from an estimated 20–50% prior to the initiative to 2.2% in 2021 (1 in 45) and to 0.2% in 2023 (1 in 455) for probationers—a near-elimination of missed DNA samples. Remaining challenges include deceased individuals and those residing out of state (an estimated 21.5% of those who “owed”), and collection efforts from census members who are registered sex offenders. Findings also document how this jurisdiction achieved such a dramatic reduction in missed DNA samples, highlight lessons learned and recommendations in implementing large-scale reforms, and provide a framework for jurisdictions seeking to strengthen LODNA sample collection practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"71 5","pages":"2114-2127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.70367","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents the final outcomes of an eight-year, countywide initiative to address “lawfully owed” DNA (LODNA) among individuals who should have had a DNA sample in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) following a qualifying arrest or conviction but did not. Building on prior research in this jurisdiction, this study evaluates the effectiveness of policies and practices in identifying, collecting, and uploading LODNA samples to CODIS. Using a comprehensive list of 14,920 individuals confirmed to have LODNA (“census”), we assessed outcomes, lessons learned, and remaining issues in the DNA sample collection process. By the end of the funded initiative, 25.5% (n = 3802) of “census members” (the 14,920 individuals on our census) were confirmed to be in CODIS, including 641 collected directly through an enacted prosecutor-initiated arraignment policy. DNA sample collection improved substantially over time. Results indicated that missed collections were reduced from an estimated 20–50% prior to the initiative to 2.2% in 2021 (1 in 45) and to 0.2% in 2023 (1 in 455) for probationers—a near-elimination of missed DNA samples. Remaining challenges include deceased individuals and those residing out of state (an estimated 21.5% of those who “owed”), and collection efforts from census members who are registered sex offenders. Findings also document how this jurisdiction achieved such a dramatic reduction in missed DNA samples, highlight lessons learned and recommendations in implementing large-scale reforms, and provide a framework for jurisdictions seeking to strengthen LODNA sample collection practices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.