Beatrice Manduchi, Carla L Warneke, Carly E A Barbon, Xiaohui Tang, Ariana J Sahli, Sheila N Buoy, Katherine A Hutcheson
{"title":"Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types.","authors":"Beatrice Manduchi, Carla L Warneke, Carly E A Barbon, Xiaohui Tang, Ariana J Sahli, Sheila N Buoy, Katherine A Hutcheson","doi":"10.1007/s00455-026-10965-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dysphagia is common across cancer populations, yet it remains poorly characterized outside of head and neck (HN) cancer. Defining swallowing profiles in diverse cancer groups is essential to guide targeted supportive care and rehabilitation. We analyzed 10,677 MBSs from 6,423 adult cancer patients referred for dysphagia assessment (2016-2021) across 12 cancer diagnoses, at a designated comprehensive cancer center. Swallowing safety and efficiency were graded using the DIGEST scale. Multivariable mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression assessed differences in DIGEST impairment (≥ 1) across diagnoses. In a subset of 704 studies, physiologic impairments were examined with the MBSImP and correlated with DIGEST outcomes. Dysphagia frequency varied significantly across cancer types for overall, safety, and efficiency domains (all p < 0.05). Overall dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) was most frequent in patients with multiple cancers including HN (71%) and gastrointestinal (64%) and lowest in breast and endocrine/thyroid cancers. Safety impairments were highest in patients with multiple cancers including HN (59%), gastrointestinal (52%), and CNS (51%), while efficiency deficits predominated in patients with multiple cancers including HN (54%), HN alone (46%), CNS and multiple non-HN cancers (both 44%). Pharyngeal swallow initiation, anterior hyoid excursion, and laryngeal vestibular closure were the most frequently impaired physiologic components. Correlations between MBSImP and DIGEST varied across cancer types. Swallowing impairment profiles differ substantially by cancer type, and link to distinct physiologic targets. These findings support developing cancer-specific dysphagia pathways and integrating physiologic and functional metrics to optimize rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13435115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-026-10965-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dysphagia is common across cancer populations, yet it remains poorly characterized outside of head and neck (HN) cancer. Defining swallowing profiles in diverse cancer groups is essential to guide targeted supportive care and rehabilitation. We analyzed 10,677 MBSs from 6,423 adult cancer patients referred for dysphagia assessment (2016-2021) across 12 cancer diagnoses, at a designated comprehensive cancer center. Swallowing safety and efficiency were graded using the DIGEST scale. Multivariable mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression assessed differences in DIGEST impairment (≥ 1) across diagnoses. In a subset of 704 studies, physiologic impairments were examined with the MBSImP and correlated with DIGEST outcomes. Dysphagia frequency varied significantly across cancer types for overall, safety, and efficiency domains (all p < 0.05). Overall dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) was most frequent in patients with multiple cancers including HN (71%) and gastrointestinal (64%) and lowest in breast and endocrine/thyroid cancers. Safety impairments were highest in patients with multiple cancers including HN (59%), gastrointestinal (52%), and CNS (51%), while efficiency deficits predominated in patients with multiple cancers including HN (54%), HN alone (46%), CNS and multiple non-HN cancers (both 44%). Pharyngeal swallow initiation, anterior hyoid excursion, and laryngeal vestibular closure were the most frequently impaired physiologic components. Correlations between MBSImP and DIGEST varied across cancer types. Swallowing impairment profiles differ substantially by cancer type, and link to distinct physiologic targets. These findings support developing cancer-specific dysphagia pathways and integrating physiologic and functional metrics to optimize rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.