Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Beatrice Manduchi, Carla L Warneke, Carly E A Barbon, Xiaohui Tang, Ariana J Sahli, Sheila N Buoy, Katherine A Hutcheson
{"title":"Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types.","authors":"Beatrice Manduchi, Carla L Warneke, Carly E A Barbon, Xiaohui Tang, Ariana J Sahli, Sheila N Buoy, Katherine A Hutcheson","doi":"10.1007/s00455-026-10965-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dysphagia is common across cancer populations, yet it remains poorly characterized outside of head and neck (HN) cancer. Defining swallowing profiles in diverse cancer groups is essential to guide targeted supportive care and rehabilitation. We analyzed 10,677 MBSs from 6,423 adult cancer patients referred for dysphagia assessment (2016-2021) across 12 cancer diagnoses, at a designated comprehensive cancer center. Swallowing safety and efficiency were graded using the DIGEST scale. Multivariable mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression assessed differences in DIGEST impairment (≥ 1) across diagnoses. In a subset of 704 studies, physiologic impairments were examined with the MBSImP and correlated with DIGEST outcomes. Dysphagia frequency varied significantly across cancer types for overall, safety, and efficiency domains (all p < 0.05). Overall dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) was most frequent in patients with multiple cancers including HN (71%) and gastrointestinal (64%) and lowest in breast and endocrine/thyroid cancers. Safety impairments were highest in patients with multiple cancers including HN (59%), gastrointestinal (52%), and CNS (51%), while efficiency deficits predominated in patients with multiple cancers including HN (54%), HN alone (46%), CNS and multiple non-HN cancers (both 44%). Pharyngeal swallow initiation, anterior hyoid excursion, and laryngeal vestibular closure were the most frequently impaired physiologic components. Correlations between MBSImP and DIGEST varied across cancer types. Swallowing impairment profiles differ substantially by cancer type, and link to distinct physiologic targets. These findings support developing cancer-specific dysphagia pathways and integrating physiologic and functional metrics to optimize rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13435115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-026-10965-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dysphagia is common across cancer populations, yet it remains poorly characterized outside of head and neck (HN) cancer. Defining swallowing profiles in diverse cancer groups is essential to guide targeted supportive care and rehabilitation. We analyzed 10,677 MBSs from 6,423 adult cancer patients referred for dysphagia assessment (2016-2021) across 12 cancer diagnoses, at a designated comprehensive cancer center. Swallowing safety and efficiency were graded using the DIGEST scale. Multivariable mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression assessed differences in DIGEST impairment (≥ 1) across diagnoses. In a subset of 704 studies, physiologic impairments were examined with the MBSImP and correlated with DIGEST outcomes. Dysphagia frequency varied significantly across cancer types for overall, safety, and efficiency domains (all p < 0.05). Overall dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) was most frequent in patients with multiple cancers including HN (71%) and gastrointestinal (64%) and lowest in breast and endocrine/thyroid cancers. Safety impairments were highest in patients with multiple cancers including HN (59%), gastrointestinal (52%), and CNS (51%), while efficiency deficits predominated in patients with multiple cancers including HN (54%), HN alone (46%), CNS and multiple non-HN cancers (both 44%). Pharyngeal swallow initiation, anterior hyoid excursion, and laryngeal vestibular closure were the most frequently impaired physiologic components. Correlations between MBSImP and DIGEST varied across cancer types. Swallowing impairment profiles differ substantially by cancer type, and link to distinct physiologic targets. These findings support developing cancer-specific dysphagia pathways and integrating physiologic and functional metrics to optimize rehabilitation.

癌症咽部吞咽困难:在12种癌症类型中表征功能和生理吞咽目标。
吞咽困难在癌症人群中很常见,但在头颈部(HN)癌症之外,吞咽困难的特征仍然很少。确定不同癌症群体的吞咽特征对于指导有针对性的支持性护理和康复至关重要。我们分析了在指定的综合癌症中心进行12种癌症诊断的6,423名成年癌症患者的10,677名mbs,这些患者接受了吞咽困难评估(2016-2021)。采用DIGEST量表对吞咽安全性和效率进行评分。多变量混合效应有序逻辑回归评估不同诊断中消化系统损伤(≥1)的差异。在704项研究的一个子集中,使用MBSImP检查生理性损伤,并将其与DIGEST结果相关联。不同癌症类型的吞咽困难频率在总体、安全性和效率领域有显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书