The effects of reductions in the numbers of animals used for the potency assay of the diphtheria and tetanus components of adsorbed vaccines by the methods of the european pharmacopoeia

C.F.M. Hendriken , J. W. v. d Gun , F.R. Marsman , J.G. Kreeftenberg
{"title":"The effects of reductions in the numbers of animals used for the potency assay of the diphtheria and tetanus components of adsorbed vaccines by the methods of the european pharmacopoeia","authors":"C.F.M. Hendriken ,&nbsp;J. W. v. d Gun ,&nbsp;F.R. Marsman ,&nbsp;J.G. Kreeftenberg","doi":"10.1016/S0092-1157(87)80008-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forty eight assays of adsorbed diphtheria vaccine and seven assays of adsorbed tetanus vaccine using either a lethal challenge (38 assays) or a serum neutralization test (17 assays) were evaluated for the effects of reductions in the number of animais used at each dilution on the potency values and 95% confidence intervals. The results were assessed in the light of the requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia and the WHO.</p><p>In the majority of assays, 50% of the number of animals presently required would have sufficed for the determination of a potency within the limits of confidence stipulated by the European Pharmacopoeia and the WHO. Therefore it is concluded that a simplified assay with a reduced number of animals is suitable for the routine potency testing of the diphtheria and tetanus components of the combined vaccines and the monovalent that were examined. Flexibility in the national and international requirements in respect of the numbers of animals used at each dilution is suggested for the routine potency assay of the diphtheria and tetanus components of adsorbed vaccines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological standardization","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0092-1157(87)80008-2","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092115787800082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Forty eight assays of adsorbed diphtheria vaccine and seven assays of adsorbed tetanus vaccine using either a lethal challenge (38 assays) or a serum neutralization test (17 assays) were evaluated for the effects of reductions in the number of animais used at each dilution on the potency values and 95% confidence intervals. The results were assessed in the light of the requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia and the WHO.

In the majority of assays, 50% of the number of animals presently required would have sufficed for the determination of a potency within the limits of confidence stipulated by the European Pharmacopoeia and the WHO. Therefore it is concluded that a simplified assay with a reduced number of animals is suitable for the routine potency testing of the diphtheria and tetanus components of the combined vaccines and the monovalent that were examined. Flexibility in the national and international requirements in respect of the numbers of animals used at each dilution is suggested for the routine potency assay of the diphtheria and tetanus components of adsorbed vaccines.

用欧洲药典的方法测定吸附疫苗中白喉和破伤风成分的效力时,减少动物数量的影响
采用致死性攻毒(38次试验)或血清中和试验(17次试验)对吸附白喉疫苗进行48次试验和吸附破伤风疫苗进行7次试验,以评估每次稀释时所用动物数量的减少对效力值和95%置信区间的影响。根据欧洲药典和世界卫生组织的要求对结果进行了评估。在大多数分析中,目前所需动物数量的50%就足以确定欧洲药典和世界卫生组织规定的置信范围内的效价。因此,结论是,减少动物数量的简化分析适用于所检查的白喉和破伤风联合疫苗和单价疫苗成分的常规效力检测。对于吸附疫苗中白喉和破伤风成分的常规效力测定,建议在每次稀释时使用的动物数量方面灵活调整国家和国际要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信