Xiaoshuai Yang , Xinyao Yang , Ziwen Guo , Qingxia Li , Changwen Mi , Zhongwei Sun
{"title":"Topology-guided multidimensional mechanics-transport-bioactivity mapping and physiological matching of porous bone scaffolds","authors":"Xiaoshuai Yang , Xinyao Yang , Ziwen Guo , Qingxia Li , Changwen Mi , Zhongwei Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2026.115118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The design of porous bone scaffolds involves balancing the competing demands of mechanical stability and biological functionality. Sufficient stiffness is essential for providing immediate load-bearing capacity after implantation, while long-term bone regeneration requires adequate permeability and flow-induced mechanobiological stimulation. This study systematically assesses the multidimensional performance of 46 representative scaffold architectures, including truss lattices, triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures, and stochastic architectures, within a biologically relevant porosity range of 60% to 80%. Through finite element simulations coupled with Gibson–Ashby scaling analysis, we show that continuous sheet-based topologies exhibit stretching-dominated deformation, significantly enhancing structural efficiency compared to bending-dominated strut and skeletal lattices. Further, three-dimensional elastic tensor analysis reveals substantial spatial anisotropy and off-axis shear vulnerabilities in highly directional lattice systems, whereas continuous sheet and stochastic architectures maintain near-isotropic stiffness distributions and better multiaxial load resistance. Hydrodynamic simulations uncover a critical transport-stimulation trade-off. While orthogonally open lattices maximize intrinsic permeability, their streamlined flow channels generate weak wall shear stress, potentially leading to hydrodynamically under-stimulated regions. In contrast, the bicontinuous curvature of sheet-based architectures modulates local flow patterns, increasing specific surface area and enhancing mechanobiological stimulation. By integrating mechanical, transport, and spatial characteristics, we establish a physiologically motivated tripartite performance map, classifying scaffold architectures into load-bearing prioritized, transport-prioritized, and biomimetic balanced regimes. More importantly, a physiological matching index is introduced to quantitatively assess scaffold suitability for various clinical scenarios. This multidimensional design framework provides a topology-guided foundation for the development of next-generation orthopedic implants tailored to specific physiological needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 115118"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823126006427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The design of porous bone scaffolds involves balancing the competing demands of mechanical stability and biological functionality. Sufficient stiffness is essential for providing immediate load-bearing capacity after implantation, while long-term bone regeneration requires adequate permeability and flow-induced mechanobiological stimulation. This study systematically assesses the multidimensional performance of 46 representative scaffold architectures, including truss lattices, triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures, and stochastic architectures, within a biologically relevant porosity range of 60% to 80%. Through finite element simulations coupled with Gibson–Ashby scaling analysis, we show that continuous sheet-based topologies exhibit stretching-dominated deformation, significantly enhancing structural efficiency compared to bending-dominated strut and skeletal lattices. Further, three-dimensional elastic tensor analysis reveals substantial spatial anisotropy and off-axis shear vulnerabilities in highly directional lattice systems, whereas continuous sheet and stochastic architectures maintain near-isotropic stiffness distributions and better multiaxial load resistance. Hydrodynamic simulations uncover a critical transport-stimulation trade-off. While orthogonally open lattices maximize intrinsic permeability, their streamlined flow channels generate weak wall shear stress, potentially leading to hydrodynamically under-stimulated regions. In contrast, the bicontinuous curvature of sheet-based architectures modulates local flow patterns, increasing specific surface area and enhancing mechanobiological stimulation. By integrating mechanical, transport, and spatial characteristics, we establish a physiologically motivated tripartite performance map, classifying scaffold architectures into load-bearing prioritized, transport-prioritized, and biomimetic balanced regimes. More importantly, a physiological matching index is introduced to quantitatively assess scaffold suitability for various clinical scenarios. This multidimensional design framework provides a topology-guided foundation for the development of next-generation orthopedic implants tailored to specific physiological needs.
期刊介绍:
Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses.
Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering.
The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.