Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) potential and impacts in Indonesia's electricity sector decarbonization

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102270
Bintang Yuwono , Lukas Kranzl , Reinhard Haas , Retno Gumilang Dewi , Ucok Welo Risma Siagian , Mohammad Rachmat Sule , Florian Kraxner , Ping Yowargana
{"title":"Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) potential and impacts in Indonesia's electricity sector decarbonization","authors":"Bintang Yuwono ,&nbsp;Lukas Kranzl ,&nbsp;Reinhard Haas ,&nbsp;Retno Gumilang Dewi ,&nbsp;Ucok Welo Risma Siagian ,&nbsp;Mohammad Rachmat Sule ,&nbsp;Florian Kraxner ,&nbsp;Ping Yowargana","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In global scenarios of 2 °C and 1.5 °C warming, integrated assessment model (IAM) studies' results demonstrated that bioenergy coupled with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can help achieve net zero and net negative emissions within the course of this century by removing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the atmosphere at scale while producing energy. However, the feasibility of BECCS depends on the availability of biomass resource, sizeable demand to cover, and access to long-term CO<sub>2</sub> storage that differs from one region to another. Several studies have investigated the BECCS deployment scenarios at national levels. However, most studies have not addressed the implication of BECCS supply chain design in the context of long-term regional electricity system development, considering the regional disparity of energy resource, CO<sub>2</sub> sources, and CO<sub>2</sub> sinks. This study assessed the potential and impacts of BECCS development in Indonesia's electricity sector net zero transition scenarios using capacity expansion model that incorporates grid expansion problem considering the regional disparities of resource and existing infrastructure. In the most stringent emission scenario, 16 GW of BECCS power generation capacities are deployed with a potential emission reduction of 265 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>, which requires about 1877 GJ of biomass and expansion of 55,000 Mt-km CO<sub>2</sub> transport pipeline capacity. Model results have demonstrated the role of BECCS as “backstop” technology for decarbonization, considering the high return on emission reduction per dollar spent rather than electricity generation. Scenarios leading to large negative emissions from BECCS will require additional biomass resources larger than the existing domestic supply, which can risk increasing negative impacts toward natural resources and environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102270"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26002373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In global scenarios of 2 °C and 1.5 °C warming, integrated assessment model (IAM) studies' results demonstrated that bioenergy coupled with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can help achieve net zero and net negative emissions within the course of this century by removing CO2 emissions from the atmosphere at scale while producing energy. However, the feasibility of BECCS depends on the availability of biomass resource, sizeable demand to cover, and access to long-term CO2 storage that differs from one region to another. Several studies have investigated the BECCS deployment scenarios at national levels. However, most studies have not addressed the implication of BECCS supply chain design in the context of long-term regional electricity system development, considering the regional disparity of energy resource, CO2 sources, and CO2 sinks. This study assessed the potential and impacts of BECCS development in Indonesia's electricity sector net zero transition scenarios using capacity expansion model that incorporates grid expansion problem considering the regional disparities of resource and existing infrastructure. In the most stringent emission scenario, 16 GW of BECCS power generation capacities are deployed with a potential emission reduction of 265 Mt CO2, which requires about 1877 GJ of biomass and expansion of 55,000 Mt-km CO2 transport pipeline capacity. Model results have demonstrated the role of BECCS as “backstop” technology for decarbonization, considering the high return on emission reduction per dollar spent rather than electricity generation. Scenarios leading to large negative emissions from BECCS will require additional biomass resources larger than the existing domestic supply, which can risk increasing negative impacts toward natural resources and environment.
具有碳捕获和封存(BECCS)潜力的生物能源及其对印度尼西亚电力部门脱碳的影响
在全球变暖2 °C和1.5 °C的情景下,综合评估模型(IAM)研究的结果表明,生物能源与碳捕获和封存(BECCS)相结合,可以在生产能源的同时从大气中大规模清除二氧化碳排放,从而有助于在本世纪实现净零排放和净负排放。然而,BECCS的可行性取决于生物质资源的可用性、需要满足的巨大需求以及能否获得因地区而异的长期二氧化碳储存。有几项研究调查了国家一级BECCS的部署情况。然而,考虑到能源资源、CO2源和CO2汇的区域差异,大多数研究都没有考虑到BECCS供应链设计在长期区域电力系统发展背景下的意义。本研究利用容量扩张模型评估了BECCS发展在印尼电力部门净零转型情景中的潜力和影响,该模型考虑了资源和现有基础设施的区域差异,纳入了电网扩张问题。在最严格的排放情景下,部署16 GW的BECCS发电容量,潜在减排265 Mt CO2,这需要约1877 GJ的生物质和扩大55,000 Mt-km的CO2输送管道能力。考虑到每一美元的减排回报比每一美元的发电回报高,模型结果证明了BECCS作为脱碳“后盾”技术的作用。导致BECCS产生大量负排放的情景将需要比现有国内供应量更大的额外生物质资源,这可能会增加对自然资源和环境的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书