Strategic evolution of port oil depot scheduling: From local optimization to integrated low-carbon energy hubs

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102273
Weiqiang Wang , Min Liu , Jun Liu , Xincheng Ma , Shengnan Du , Cuicui Li , Tianyu Bao , Hongyu Zhang , Bingyuan Hong
{"title":"Strategic evolution of port oil depot scheduling: From local optimization to integrated low-carbon energy hubs","authors":"Weiqiang Wang ,&nbsp;Min Liu ,&nbsp;Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Xincheng Ma ,&nbsp;Shengnan Du ,&nbsp;Cuicui Li ,&nbsp;Tianyu Bao ,&nbsp;Hongyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Bingyuan Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global energy systems undergo a profound transition towards sustainability and resilience, the strategic role of port oil depots has evolved from mere logistical nodes to critical hubs governing energy security and low-carbon integration. This study conducts a systematic analysis of 637 publications (2014–2025) to map the strategic evolution of scheduling optimization in this domain. The findings reveal a clear paradigm shift: from isolated, single-point efficiency optimization towards integrated “ship-shore-pipeline” synergy, aimed at resolving systemic bottlenecks such as “vessels waiting for tanks”. Concurrently, decision-making objectives have expanded to encompass a multi-dimensional trade-off among economic efficiency, carbon emissions, and system resilience, reflecting the influence of global “dual carbon” goals. Methodologically, mixed integer linear programming (MILP) dominates for modeling complex physical constraints, while the integration of artificial intelligence with operations research (OR-AI) emerges as a key enabler for handling uncertainty. Spatially, research leadership is concentrated in demand-driven China and technology-driven the US, yet cross-border collaboration remains limited. By constructing a “scenario-objective-method” framework, this study deciphers the knowledge architecture and evolutionary trajectory, concluding with strategic priorities for future research-including dynamic resilient scheduling, multi-energy flow coupling, and full-lifecycle green decision-making-to guide the development of next-generation intelligent and sustainable port energy hubs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102273"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26002403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global energy systems undergo a profound transition towards sustainability and resilience, the strategic role of port oil depots has evolved from mere logistical nodes to critical hubs governing energy security and low-carbon integration. This study conducts a systematic analysis of 637 publications (2014–2025) to map the strategic evolution of scheduling optimization in this domain. The findings reveal a clear paradigm shift: from isolated, single-point efficiency optimization towards integrated “ship-shore-pipeline” synergy, aimed at resolving systemic bottlenecks such as “vessels waiting for tanks”. Concurrently, decision-making objectives have expanded to encompass a multi-dimensional trade-off among economic efficiency, carbon emissions, and system resilience, reflecting the influence of global “dual carbon” goals. Methodologically, mixed integer linear programming (MILP) dominates for modeling complex physical constraints, while the integration of artificial intelligence with operations research (OR-AI) emerges as a key enabler for handling uncertainty. Spatially, research leadership is concentrated in demand-driven China and technology-driven the US, yet cross-border collaboration remains limited. By constructing a “scenario-objective-method” framework, this study deciphers the knowledge architecture and evolutionary trajectory, concluding with strategic priorities for future research-including dynamic resilient scheduling, multi-energy flow coupling, and full-lifecycle green decision-making-to guide the development of next-generation intelligent and sustainable port energy hubs.
港口油库调度的战略演变:从局部优化到综合低碳能源枢纽
随着全球能源系统向可持续性和弹性的深刻转变,港口油库的战略作用已经从单纯的物流节点演变为管理能源安全和低碳一体化的关键枢纽。本研究通过对637篇文献(2014-2025年)的系统分析,绘制了该领域调度优化的战略演进图。研究结果揭示了一种明显的模式转变:从孤立的单点效率优化转向综合的“船-岸-管道”协同,旨在解决系统瓶颈,如“等待储罐的船只”。同时,决策目标已经扩展到包括经济效率、碳排放和系统弹性之间的多维权衡,反映了全球“双碳”目标的影响。在方法上,混合整数线性规划(MILP)主导了复杂物理约束的建模,而人工智能与运筹学(OR-AI)的集成成为处理不确定性的关键推动因素。从空间上看,研究领先地位集中在需求驱动型的中国和技术驱动型的美国,但跨境合作仍然有限。通过构建“场景-目标-方法”框架,解读知识架构和演化轨迹,提出未来研究的战略重点,包括动态弹性调度、多能流耦合和全生命周期绿色决策,以指导下一代智能可持续港口能源枢纽的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书