Tourist heterogeneity in carbon compensation: A two-stage framework for sustainable island tourism policy

IF 4.1 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Aythami Santana-Padrón , Yen E. Lam-González , Javier de León
{"title":"Tourist heterogeneity in carbon compensation: A two-stage framework for sustainable island tourism policy","authors":"Aythami Santana-Padrón ,&nbsp;Yen E. Lam-González ,&nbsp;Javier de León","doi":"10.1016/j.annale.2026.100222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small island tourism destinations face a paradox: prosperity depends on the natural assets that tourism threatens. Current compensation policies fail by treating tourists identically through single-stage frameworks that conflate participation barriers with contribution intensity. Using stated preference data from 70,930 Canary Islands tourists, hurdle models with bootstrap validation separate participation (Stage 1: complementary log-log) from contribution intensity (Stage 2: OLS) across four compensation levels (&lt;5% to &gt;20% of trip expenditure). Education increases participation yet reduces contribution intensity (€ − 0.23 to €-6.63); near-zero residual correlation (ρ = 0.0004, <em>p</em> = 0.955) confirms distinct mechanisms govern each stage. Progressive taxation aligned with spending capacity generates €770.4 M versus €267.9 M from flat rates—a 188% revenue increase—transforming compensation into a self-financing mechanism requiring expenditure proxies and machine learning for full implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34520,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666957926000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small island tourism destinations face a paradox: prosperity depends on the natural assets that tourism threatens. Current compensation policies fail by treating tourists identically through single-stage frameworks that conflate participation barriers with contribution intensity. Using stated preference data from 70,930 Canary Islands tourists, hurdle models with bootstrap validation separate participation (Stage 1: complementary log-log) from contribution intensity (Stage 2: OLS) across four compensation levels (<5% to >20% of trip expenditure). Education increases participation yet reduces contribution intensity (€ − 0.23 to €-6.63); near-zero residual correlation (ρ = 0.0004, p = 0.955) confirms distinct mechanisms govern each stage. Progressive taxation aligned with spending capacity generates €770.4 M versus €267.9 M from flat rates—a 188% revenue increase—transforming compensation into a self-financing mechanism requiring expenditure proxies and machine learning for full implementation.
碳补偿中的游客异质性:可持续岛屿旅游政策的两阶段框架
小岛屿旅游目的地面临着一个悖论:繁荣取决于旅游业所威胁的自然资产。目前的补偿政策失败的原因是,通过单一阶段的框架,将参与障碍与贡献强度混为一谈,对游客一视同仁。使用来自70,930名加那利群岛游客的陈述偏好数据,具有自举验证的障碍模型将参与(阶段1:互补对数-对数)与贡献强度(阶段2:OLS)在四个补偿水平(旅行支出的<;5%至>;20%)中分开。教育提高了参与率,但降低了贡献强度(- 0.23欧元至-6.63欧元);残差相关性接近于零(ρ = 0.0004, p = 0.955)证实了不同的机制支配着每个阶段。与支出能力相匹配的累进税产生7.704亿欧元,而统一税率产生2.679亿欧元——收入增长188%——将补偿转变为自我融资机制,需要支出代理和机器学习才能全面实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights
Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
106 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书