Elena Pasanisi , Rachel White , Chloe Bowles , Karina Wahl , Colette R. Hirsch
{"title":"Effects of modifying interpretation bias on repetitive negative thinking in individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive symptoms","authors":"Elena Pasanisi , Rachel White , Chloe Bowles , Karina Wahl , Colette R. Hirsch","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2026.101018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repetitive negative thinking (RNT, e.g., worry and rumination) is a maintaining factor in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Studies have shown that training people to make fewer negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios (known as cognitive bias modification training for interpretations or ‘CBM-I’) reduces RNT among individuals with anxiety and depression. This is the first study to investigate the effect of imagery-enhanced CBMI-I on RNT among individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms.</div><div>Individuals scoring above clinical cut-off for OCD were presented with a series of OCD-relevant ambiguous scenarios and either received imagery-enhanced CBM-I training, in which scenarios were resolved positively and participants generated vivid mental images of the positive outcome (N = 25), or an active control condition in which the same scenarios were presented without positive resolution (N = 25). They then completed a measure of interpretation bias and a proxy measure of RNT.</div><div>Individuals in the CBM-I condition generated significantly more positive interpretations following training than those in the control condition. However, this effect did not carry over to the measure of RNT.</div><div>Future research should consider matching CBM-I training to more idiosyncratic obsessional concerns, more intensive training or using alternative measures of RNT, to determine whether interpretation bias maintains RNT in OCD, or if other potential mechanisms are indeed involved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364926000254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Repetitive negative thinking (RNT, e.g., worry and rumination) is a maintaining factor in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Studies have shown that training people to make fewer negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios (known as cognitive bias modification training for interpretations or ‘CBM-I’) reduces RNT among individuals with anxiety and depression. This is the first study to investigate the effect of imagery-enhanced CBMI-I on RNT among individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms.
Individuals scoring above clinical cut-off for OCD were presented with a series of OCD-relevant ambiguous scenarios and either received imagery-enhanced CBM-I training, in which scenarios were resolved positively and participants generated vivid mental images of the positive outcome (N = 25), or an active control condition in which the same scenarios were presented without positive resolution (N = 25). They then completed a measure of interpretation bias and a proxy measure of RNT.
Individuals in the CBM-I condition generated significantly more positive interpretations following training than those in the control condition. However, this effect did not carry over to the measure of RNT.
Future research should consider matching CBM-I training to more idiosyncratic obsessional concerns, more intensive training or using alternative measures of RNT, to determine whether interpretation bias maintains RNT in OCD, or if other potential mechanisms are indeed involved.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions.
Suitable topics for manuscripts include:
-The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders
-Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena
-OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts
-Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions
-Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies
-Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders
-Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders
-Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.