Effects of modifying interpretation bias on repetitive negative thinking in individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive symptoms

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Elena Pasanisi , Rachel White , Chloe Bowles , Karina Wahl , Colette R. Hirsch
{"title":"Effects of modifying interpretation bias on repetitive negative thinking in individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive symptoms","authors":"Elena Pasanisi ,&nbsp;Rachel White ,&nbsp;Chloe Bowles ,&nbsp;Karina Wahl ,&nbsp;Colette R. Hirsch","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2026.101018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repetitive negative thinking (RNT, e.g., worry and rumination) is a maintaining factor in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Studies have shown that training people to make fewer negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios (known as cognitive bias modification training for interpretations or ‘CBM-I’) reduces RNT among individuals with anxiety and depression. This is the first study to investigate the effect of imagery-enhanced CBMI-I on RNT among individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms.</div><div>Individuals scoring above clinical cut-off for OCD were presented with a series of OCD-relevant ambiguous scenarios and either received imagery-enhanced CBM-I training, in which scenarios were resolved positively and participants generated vivid mental images of the positive outcome (N = 25), or an active control condition in which the same scenarios were presented without positive resolution (N = 25). They then completed a measure of interpretation bias and a proxy measure of RNT.</div><div>Individuals in the CBM-I condition generated significantly more positive interpretations following training than those in the control condition. However, this effect did not carry over to the measure of RNT.</div><div>Future research should consider matching CBM-I training to more idiosyncratic obsessional concerns, more intensive training or using alternative measures of RNT, to determine whether interpretation bias maintains RNT in OCD, or if other potential mechanisms are indeed involved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364926000254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repetitive negative thinking (RNT, e.g., worry and rumination) is a maintaining factor in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Studies have shown that training people to make fewer negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios (known as cognitive bias modification training for interpretations or ‘CBM-I’) reduces RNT among individuals with anxiety and depression. This is the first study to investigate the effect of imagery-enhanced CBMI-I on RNT among individuals with elevated obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms.
Individuals scoring above clinical cut-off for OCD were presented with a series of OCD-relevant ambiguous scenarios and either received imagery-enhanced CBM-I training, in which scenarios were resolved positively and participants generated vivid mental images of the positive outcome (N = 25), or an active control condition in which the same scenarios were presented without positive resolution (N = 25). They then completed a measure of interpretation bias and a proxy measure of RNT.
Individuals in the CBM-I condition generated significantly more positive interpretations following training than those in the control condition. However, this effect did not carry over to the measure of RNT.
Future research should consider matching CBM-I training to more idiosyncratic obsessional concerns, more intensive training or using alternative measures of RNT, to determine whether interpretation bias maintains RNT in OCD, or if other potential mechanisms are indeed involved.
修正解释偏差对重度强迫症患者重复性消极思维的影响
重复的消极思维(RNT,如担忧和沉思)是强迫症(OCD)的维持因素。研究表明,训练人们对模棱两可的情景做出更少的负面解释(被称为认知偏见修正解释训练或‘ CBM-I ’)可以减少焦虑和抑郁个体的RNT。这是第一个研究图像增强cbmi - 1对强迫症(OC)症状升高个体RNT影响的研究。研究人员向得分高于临床临界值的强迫症患者提供一系列与强迫症相关的模糊情景,并对他们进行图像增强的CBM-I训练,其中情景得到积极解决,参与者对积极结果产生生动的心理图像(N = 25),或者在积极的控制条件下,同样的情景没有得到积极解决(N = 25)。然后,他们完成了解释偏差的测量和RNT的代理测量。在训练后,cbm - 1条件下的个体比对照组产生了更多的积极解释。然而,这种影响并没有延续到RNT的测量中。未来的研究应该考虑将CBM-I训练与更特殊的强迫问题相匹配,更强化的训练或使用RNT的替代测量,以确定解释偏见是否维持强迫症的RNT,或者是否确实涉及其他潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书