A comprehensive investigation of social cognition in body dysmorphic disorder

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Katrina Holmes à Court , Ella Byrne , Ravi Iyer , Wei Lin Toh , Susan L. Rossell
{"title":"A comprehensive investigation of social cognition in body dysmorphic disorder","authors":"Katrina Holmes à Court ,&nbsp;Ella Byrne ,&nbsp;Ravi Iyer ,&nbsp;Wei Lin Toh ,&nbsp;Susan L. Rossell","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2026.101015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Impaired social cognition may contribute to the development and maintenance of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), yet evidence is often inconsistent or limited to a single task or domain. This study aimed to characterise the social-cognitive profile of individuals with BDD across multiple domains (theory of mind (ToM), emotion recognition, pragmatic inference and empathy).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were 61 individuals with BDD and 61 healthy controls. Social cognition was assessed using six tasks: the Hinting Task (inferential ToM), the Awareness of Social Inference Test–Short (TASIT-S; ToM), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (ToM), Bell–Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task, TASIT-S Part 1 and Penn Emotion Recognition Test (dynamic and static emotion recognition), TASIT-S ‘say’ (pragmatic inference) and the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (empathy).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The BDD group showed selective differences rather than global impairment. Group differences included: participants with BDD demonstrated enhanced TASIT-S ToM (<em>d</em> = 0.48, 95% <em>CI</em> [0.11, 0.85]), heightened (static) anger recognition (<em>d</em> = 0.67, 95% <em>CI</em> [0.29, 1.06]), superior pragmatic inference (<em>d</em> = 0.61, 95% <em>CI</em> [0.24, 0.98]) and elevated cognitive empathy (<em>d</em> = 0.49, 95% <em>CI</em> [0.09, 0.89]), driven by perspective taking, while Hinting was lower (<em>d</em> = −0.42, 95% <em>CI</em> [−0.78, −0.06]). No effects were associated with clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Social cognition in BDD is not broadly impaired, instead showing a pattern of heightened sensitivity to threat cues and difficulties with higher-order inferential reasoning. If replicated, these findings may inform cognitive-behavioural approaches by identifying automatic threat responses and inferential social reasoning as potential therapeutic targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101015"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364926000229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Impaired social cognition may contribute to the development and maintenance of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), yet evidence is often inconsistent or limited to a single task or domain. This study aimed to characterise the social-cognitive profile of individuals with BDD across multiple domains (theory of mind (ToM), emotion recognition, pragmatic inference and empathy).

Methods

Participants were 61 individuals with BDD and 61 healthy controls. Social cognition was assessed using six tasks: the Hinting Task (inferential ToM), the Awareness of Social Inference Test–Short (TASIT-S; ToM), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (ToM), Bell–Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task, TASIT-S Part 1 and Penn Emotion Recognition Test (dynamic and static emotion recognition), TASIT-S ‘say’ (pragmatic inference) and the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (empathy).

Results

The BDD group showed selective differences rather than global impairment. Group differences included: participants with BDD demonstrated enhanced TASIT-S ToM (d = 0.48, 95% CI [0.11, 0.85]), heightened (static) anger recognition (d = 0.67, 95% CI [0.29, 1.06]), superior pragmatic inference (d = 0.61, 95% CI [0.24, 0.98]) and elevated cognitive empathy (d = 0.49, 95% CI [0.09, 0.89]), driven by perspective taking, while Hinting was lower (d = −0.42, 95% CI [−0.78, −0.06]). No effects were associated with clinical variables.

Conclusions

Social cognition in BDD is not broadly impaired, instead showing a pattern of heightened sensitivity to threat cues and difficulties with higher-order inferential reasoning. If replicated, these findings may inform cognitive-behavioural approaches by identifying automatic threat responses and inferential social reasoning as potential therapeutic targets.
躯体畸形障碍患者社会认知的综合调查
目的:社会认知障碍可能与身体畸形障碍(BDD)的发展和维持有关,但证据往往不一致或局限于单一的任务或领域。本研究旨在描述BDD患者在多个领域(心理理论、情绪识别、语用推理和共情)的社会认知特征。方法研究对象为61例BDD患者和61例健康对照。社会认知测试采用暗示测试(推理ToM)、社会推理意识测试(TASIT-S; ToM)、眼读心术测试(ToM)、Bell-Lysaker情绪识别测试、TASIT-S第一部分和Penn情绪识别测试(动态和静态情绪识别)、TASIT-S“说”测试(语用推理)和认知和情感共情问卷(共情)六个测试。结果BDD组表现为选择性差异,而非全局性损伤。组间差异包括:BDD患者表现出TASIT-S ToM增强(d = 0.48, 95% CI[0.11, 0.85])、(静态)愤怒识别增强(d = 0.67, 95% CI[0.29, 1.06])、卓越的语用推断(d = 0.61, 95% CI[0.24, 0.98])和认知共情增强(d = 0.49, 95% CI[0.09, 0.89]),这是由观点接受驱动的,而暗示较低(d = - 0.42, 95% CI[- 0.78, - 0.06])。没有与临床变量相关的影响。结论BDD患者的社会认知并没有受到广泛的损害,而是表现出对威胁线索的高度敏感性和高阶推理困难的模式。如果重复,这些发现可能通过识别自动威胁反应和推理社会推理作为潜在的治疗目标,为认知行为方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书