No country for young people: Intergenerational burdens of COVID-19 policy responses

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Policy Modeling Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.107043
Giuseppe Ciccarone , Francesco Giuli , Enrico Marchetti , Gabriele Maugeri
{"title":"No country for young people: Intergenerational burdens of COVID-19 policy responses","authors":"Giuseppe Ciccarone ,&nbsp;Francesco Giuli ,&nbsp;Enrico Marchetti ,&nbsp;Gabriele Maugeri","doi":"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.107043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper analyzes the intergenerational welfare effects of the economic policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic, with particular attention to containment measures, fiscal expansions, and alternative public debt repayment schemes. We build on Gertler’s (1999) model by introducing the pandemic as a negative shock to survival probabilities. Social distancing and lockdowns reduce mortality among older cohorts but simultaneously depress labor productivity, capturing the key demographic asymmetry of the pandemic. Within this framework, we construct age-specific welfare indices for “young” and “old” agents, as well as a relative welfare metric to evaluate intergenerational trade-offs. Our quantitative analysis yields four main results: (1) in the absence of containment measures, welfare losses are concentrated among older agents through a demographic channel; (2) lockdowns substantially shift the burden of welfare losses toward younger cohorts, reflecting the trade-off between mortality reduction and output contraction; (3) debt-financed fiscal expansions exert only a modest effect on relative welfare compared with the dominant impact of social distancing; (4) the intergenerational distribution of welfare depends critically on debt repayment strategies: front-loaded schemes disproportionately penalize younger generations, whereas postponed repayment schedules favor older cohorts, raising equity and policy-design considerations for future large-scale crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Modeling","volume":"48 3","pages":"Article 107043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893826000372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the intergenerational welfare effects of the economic policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic, with particular attention to containment measures, fiscal expansions, and alternative public debt repayment schemes. We build on Gertler’s (1999) model by introducing the pandemic as a negative shock to survival probabilities. Social distancing and lockdowns reduce mortality among older cohorts but simultaneously depress labor productivity, capturing the key demographic asymmetry of the pandemic. Within this framework, we construct age-specific welfare indices for “young” and “old” agents, as well as a relative welfare metric to evaluate intergenerational trade-offs. Our quantitative analysis yields four main results: (1) in the absence of containment measures, welfare losses are concentrated among older agents through a demographic channel; (2) lockdowns substantially shift the burden of welfare losses toward younger cohorts, reflecting the trade-off between mortality reduction and output contraction; (3) debt-financed fiscal expansions exert only a modest effect on relative welfare compared with the dominant impact of social distancing; (4) the intergenerational distribution of welfare depends critically on debt repayment strategies: front-loaded schemes disproportionately penalize younger generations, whereas postponed repayment schedules favor older cohorts, raising equity and policy-design considerations for future large-scale crises.
没有年轻人的国家:COVID-19政策应对的代际负担
本文分析了应对COVID-19大流行的经济政策对代际福利的影响,特别关注了遏制措施、财政扩张和替代性公共债务偿还计划。我们在Gertler(1999)模型的基础上,引入了流行病对生存概率的负面冲击。社交距离和封锁降低了老年人群的死亡率,但同时也降低了劳动生产率,抓住了大流行的关键人口不对称。在此框架内,我们构建了针对“年轻”和“年老”代理人的年龄特定福利指数,以及评估代际权衡的相对福利指标。我们的定量分析得出了四个主要结果:(1)在没有遏制措施的情况下,福利损失通过人口统计渠道集中在老年代理人身上;(2)封锁实质上将福利损失的负担转移给了更年轻的人群,反映了死亡率降低和产出收缩之间的权衡;(3)与保持社会距离的主导影响相比,债务融资的财政扩张对相对福利的影响较小;(4)福利的代际分配主要取决于债务偿还策略:提前还款计划不成比例地惩罚年轻一代,而推迟还款计划则有利于年长一代,这提高了公平和政策设计方面的考虑,以应对未来的大规模危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policy Modeling is published by Elsevier for the Society for Policy Modeling to provide a forum for analysis and debate concerning international policy issues. The journal addresses questions of critical import to the world community as a whole, and it focuses upon the economic, social, and political interdependencies between national and regional systems. This implies concern with international policies for the promotion of a better life for all human beings and, therefore, concentrates on improved methodological underpinnings for dealing with these problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书