Development and internal validation of QRSense: A portable tool for manual and structured measurement of electrocardiograms in digital tracings

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of electrocardiology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154368
Santiago Obregón-Rosas MD , Ángel Antonio Montañez-Aguirre MD , José Pablo Navarrete-Punaro , Viviana Cardoso-Pérez , Carlos Horta-Hurtado , Diego García-Almazán , Isabella Rojas-Bergés , Diana Elisa Morales-Sánchez , Fátima Cecilia Hernández-Alcaraz , José Luis Morales-Rios , Rafael Bracamonte-Palma
{"title":"Development and internal validation of QRSense: A portable tool for manual and structured measurement of electrocardiograms in digital tracings","authors":"Santiago Obregón-Rosas MD ,&nbsp;Ángel Antonio Montañez-Aguirre MD ,&nbsp;José Pablo Navarrete-Punaro ,&nbsp;Viviana Cardoso-Pérez ,&nbsp;Carlos Horta-Hurtado ,&nbsp;Diego García-Almazán ,&nbsp;Isabella Rojas-Bergés ,&nbsp;Diana Elisa Morales-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Fátima Cecilia Hernández-Alcaraz ,&nbsp;José Luis Morales-Rios ,&nbsp;Rafael Bracamonte-Palma","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Manual electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement entails inter-observer variability that affects clinical reproducibility. QRSense was developed as an open-source, offline digital tool to standardize this process.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the technical characteristics and to evaluate the measurement agreement and reproducibility of QRSense compared with conventional manual measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A client-side web application based on HTML5 Canvas was developed for vector-based measurements without automation. Subsequently, a cross-sectional concordance study was conducted using 50 consecutively selected ECG tracings. Eight independent observers measured QRS duration and voltage, divided into two groups of four observers each (four using QRSense and four using manual methods). Agreement between methods was assessed with Bland–Altman analysis (bias and 95% limits of agreement) and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) as the primary metric of exact agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Excellent exact agreement was observed for both parameters: Lin's CCC was 0.9527 for QRS voltage and 0.9221 for QRS duration. Bland–Altman analysis showed a negligible mean bias of +0.0482 mV for voltage (95% limits of agreement: −0.0958 to +0.1922 mV) and a small bias of −1.32 ms for duration (95% limits of agreement: −16.24 to +13.59 ms), without proportional trends across the measurement range.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QRSense is a valid and reliable tool. It offers measurement agreement comparable to expert human measurement and supports reproducible quantification of ECG parameters, facilitating the standardization and auditability of electrocardiographic data for research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 154368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073626001858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Manual electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement entails inter-observer variability that affects clinical reproducibility. QRSense was developed as an open-source, offline digital tool to standardize this process.

Objective

To describe the technical characteristics and to evaluate the measurement agreement and reproducibility of QRSense compared with conventional manual measurement.

Methods

A client-side web application based on HTML5 Canvas was developed for vector-based measurements without automation. Subsequently, a cross-sectional concordance study was conducted using 50 consecutively selected ECG tracings. Eight independent observers measured QRS duration and voltage, divided into two groups of four observers each (four using QRSense and four using manual methods). Agreement between methods was assessed with Bland–Altman analysis (bias and 95% limits of agreement) and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) as the primary metric of exact agreement.

Results

Excellent exact agreement was observed for both parameters: Lin's CCC was 0.9527 for QRS voltage and 0.9221 for QRS duration. Bland–Altman analysis showed a negligible mean bias of +0.0482 mV for voltage (95% limits of agreement: −0.0958 to +0.1922 mV) and a small bias of −1.32 ms for duration (95% limits of agreement: −16.24 to +13.59 ms), without proportional trends across the measurement range.

Conclusion

QRSense is a valid and reliable tool. It offers measurement agreement comparable to expert human measurement and supports reproducible quantification of ECG parameters, facilitating the standardization and auditability of electrocardiographic data for research and clinical practice.
QRSense的开发和内部验证:一种用于数字跟踪中手动和结构化测量心电图的便携式工具
人工心电图(ECG)测量涉及观察者之间的可变性,影响临床可重复性。QRSense是作为一个开源的离线数字工具开发的,用于标准化这一过程。目的描述QRSense的技术特点,评价QRSense与传统人工测量的一致性和重复性。方法开发基于HTML5 Canvas的客户端web应用程序,实现无自动化的矢量测量。随后,使用50个连续选择的心电示图进行横断面一致性研究。8名独立观察员测量QRS持续时间和电压,分为两组,每组4名观察员(4名使用QRSense, 4名使用手动方法)。采用Bland-Altman分析(偏差和95%一致性限制)和Lin’s一致性相关系数(CCC)作为准确一致性的主要指标来评估方法之间的一致性。结果两参数吻合良好:QRS电压的Lin’s CCC为0.9527,QRS持续时间的Lin’s CCC为0.9221。Bland-Altman分析显示,电压的平均偏差可忽略不计,为+0.0482 mV(95%一致性限值:−0.0958至+0.1922 mV),持续时间的偏差很小,为−1.32 ms(95%一致性限值:−16.24至+13.59 ms),在整个测量范围内没有成比例的趋势。结论qrsense是一种有效、可靠的检测工具。它提供了与专家测量相媲美的测量协议,并支持ECG参数的可重复量化,促进了研究和临床实践中心电图数据的标准化和可审计性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of electrocardiology
Journal of electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书