Santiago Obregón-Rosas MD , Ángel Antonio Montañez-Aguirre MD , José Pablo Navarrete-Punaro , Viviana Cardoso-Pérez , Carlos Horta-Hurtado , Diego García-Almazán , Isabella Rojas-Bergés , Diana Elisa Morales-Sánchez , Fátima Cecilia Hernández-Alcaraz , José Luis Morales-Rios , Rafael Bracamonte-Palma
{"title":"Development and internal validation of QRSense: A portable tool for manual and structured measurement of electrocardiograms in digital tracings","authors":"Santiago Obregón-Rosas MD , Ángel Antonio Montañez-Aguirre MD , José Pablo Navarrete-Punaro , Viviana Cardoso-Pérez , Carlos Horta-Hurtado , Diego García-Almazán , Isabella Rojas-Bergés , Diana Elisa Morales-Sánchez , Fátima Cecilia Hernández-Alcaraz , José Luis Morales-Rios , Rafael Bracamonte-Palma","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Manual electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement entails inter-observer variability that affects clinical reproducibility. QRSense was developed as an open-source, offline digital tool to standardize this process.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the technical characteristics and to evaluate the measurement agreement and reproducibility of QRSense compared with conventional manual measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A client-side web application based on HTML5 Canvas was developed for vector-based measurements without automation. Subsequently, a cross-sectional concordance study was conducted using 50 consecutively selected ECG tracings. Eight independent observers measured QRS duration and voltage, divided into two groups of four observers each (four using QRSense and four using manual methods). Agreement between methods was assessed with Bland–Altman analysis (bias and 95% limits of agreement) and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) as the primary metric of exact agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Excellent exact agreement was observed for both parameters: Lin's CCC was 0.9527 for QRS voltage and 0.9221 for QRS duration. Bland–Altman analysis showed a negligible mean bias of +0.0482 mV for voltage (95% limits of agreement: −0.0958 to +0.1922 mV) and a small bias of −1.32 ms for duration (95% limits of agreement: −16.24 to +13.59 ms), without proportional trends across the measurement range.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QRSense is a valid and reliable tool. It offers measurement agreement comparable to expert human measurement and supports reproducible quantification of ECG parameters, facilitating the standardization and auditability of electrocardiographic data for research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 154368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073626001858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Manual electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement entails inter-observer variability that affects clinical reproducibility. QRSense was developed as an open-source, offline digital tool to standardize this process.
Objective
To describe the technical characteristics and to evaluate the measurement agreement and reproducibility of QRSense compared with conventional manual measurement.
Methods
A client-side web application based on HTML5 Canvas was developed for vector-based measurements without automation. Subsequently, a cross-sectional concordance study was conducted using 50 consecutively selected ECG tracings. Eight independent observers measured QRS duration and voltage, divided into two groups of four observers each (four using QRSense and four using manual methods). Agreement between methods was assessed with Bland–Altman analysis (bias and 95% limits of agreement) and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) as the primary metric of exact agreement.
Results
Excellent exact agreement was observed for both parameters: Lin's CCC was 0.9527 for QRS voltage and 0.9221 for QRS duration. Bland–Altman analysis showed a negligible mean bias of +0.0482 mV for voltage (95% limits of agreement: −0.0958 to +0.1922 mV) and a small bias of −1.32 ms for duration (95% limits of agreement: −16.24 to +13.59 ms), without proportional trends across the measurement range.
Conclusion
QRSense is a valid and reliable tool. It offers measurement agreement comparable to expert human measurement and supports reproducible quantification of ECG parameters, facilitating the standardization and auditability of electrocardiographic data for research and clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.