Deus Bigirimana, Nelson Hu, Janice Soo, Myra McGuinness, Elaine Chong, Catherine Green, Keith R Martin, Nazlee Zebardast, Alp Atik
{"title":"Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Xen45 Gel Stent versus Trabeculectomy in the US Medicare System.","authors":"Deus Bigirimana, Nelson Hu, Janice Soo, Myra McGuinness, Elaine Chong, Catherine Green, Keith R Martin, Nazlee Zebardast, Alp Atik","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2026.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the cost-effectiveness of Xen45 Gel Stent (XGS) compared with trabeculectomy for the surgical management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in the US Medicare system.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cost-utility analysis using safety and efficacy results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and other pivotal RCTs.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Markov model cohort of adult patients with OAG METHODS: Open-angle glaucoma treatment costs and effects were analyzed with a deterministic model over a 1-year horizon using TreeAge software. Health states included the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson glaucoma stages (mild, moderate, advanced, blind) and death. Treatment effect was measured as mean number of ocular hypotensive medications and reduction in intraocular pressure, which had a direct impact on transition probabilities between health states. Scenario analyses with future projections were also performed at 2, 5, 10, and 20 years. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of additional variables, including disutility of XGS relative to trabeculectomy and number of follow-up visits. Both treatment arms were subject to complication and reoperation rates, which were factored in the model.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained at a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 50 000 per QALY.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 year, the expected total cost for XGS was USD 10512 compared with USD 8649 for trabeculectomy. Xen45 Gel Stent yielded 0.8602 QALYs at the 1-year horizon, compared with 0.8523 for trabeculectomy, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 236629 per QALY. Xen45 Gel Stent became dominated by trabeculectomy at 5 years, meaning it had higher costs and worse outcomes. When XGS was given half the follow-up rate of trabeculectomy at 1-year, trabeculectomy remained the cost-effective option as the ICER of XGS was USD 200634 per QALY. Trabeculectomy remained cost-effective even when there was no perioperative disutility applied to XGS. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that trabeculectomy was cost-effective in 88.4% of iterations and dominant in 45.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xen45 Gel Stent does not appear to be cost-effective compared to trabeculectomy in the surgical management of glaucoma, even accounting for the purported advantages of less follow-up and decreased postoperative disutility.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2026.05.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the cost-effectiveness of Xen45 Gel Stent (XGS) compared with trabeculectomy for the surgical management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in the US Medicare system.
Design: Cost-utility analysis using safety and efficacy results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and other pivotal RCTs.
Subjects: Markov model cohort of adult patients with OAG METHODS: Open-angle glaucoma treatment costs and effects were analyzed with a deterministic model over a 1-year horizon using TreeAge software. Health states included the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson glaucoma stages (mild, moderate, advanced, blind) and death. Treatment effect was measured as mean number of ocular hypotensive medications and reduction in intraocular pressure, which had a direct impact on transition probabilities between health states. Scenario analyses with future projections were also performed at 2, 5, 10, and 20 years. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of additional variables, including disutility of XGS relative to trabeculectomy and number of follow-up visits. Both treatment arms were subject to complication and reoperation rates, which were factored in the model.
Main outcome measures: Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained at a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 50 000 per QALY.
Results: At 1 year, the expected total cost for XGS was USD 10512 compared with USD 8649 for trabeculectomy. Xen45 Gel Stent yielded 0.8602 QALYs at the 1-year horizon, compared with 0.8523 for trabeculectomy, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 236629 per QALY. Xen45 Gel Stent became dominated by trabeculectomy at 5 years, meaning it had higher costs and worse outcomes. When XGS was given half the follow-up rate of trabeculectomy at 1-year, trabeculectomy remained the cost-effective option as the ICER of XGS was USD 200634 per QALY. Trabeculectomy remained cost-effective even when there was no perioperative disutility applied to XGS. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that trabeculectomy was cost-effective in 88.4% of iterations and dominant in 45.8%.
Conclusions: Xen45 Gel Stent does not appear to be cost-effective compared to trabeculectomy in the surgical management of glaucoma, even accounting for the purported advantages of less follow-up and decreased postoperative disutility.
Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.