Belief, bond, and relief: Longitudinal associations between client belief about counseling success, working alliance, and symptom relief.

IF 3.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Xu Li, Yimeng Zhang, Shitao Chen
{"title":"Belief, bond, and relief: Longitudinal associations between client belief about counseling success, working alliance, and symptom relief.","authors":"Xu Li, Yimeng Zhang, Shitao Chen","doi":"10.1037/cou0000879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined how clients' outcome expectations (OE; belief about positive outcome of counseling session) was associated with working alliance and symptom relief longitudinally in a sample of Chinese beginning therapist trainees and their clients. Participants included 204 Chinese therapist trainees and their 1,214 clients who provided data for 11,198 sessions. Before every therapy session after intake, clients reported their symptom severity level and OE; after every session, clients reported their perceived working alliance quality. The latent curve model with structured residuals (Curran et al., 2014) was utilized to disentangle the between-person (average client differences) and within-person (session-by-session fluctuations) effects and test the temporal directionality between the three variables of interest. Results showed that, at the between-person level, clients who began treatment with stronger positive OE tended to form stronger alliances and report lower symptom distress at the beginning of therapy; and clients who sustained or increased their OE during treatment showed greater alliance growth and faster symptom reduction over time. At the within-person level, a cyclical pathway emerged where higher OE before a session temporally led to higher working alliance rating after that session, which subsequently led to higher OE at the next session; however, results did not support the OE → working alliance → symptom mediation model, nor the bidirectional associations between client OE and symptom relief. Practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined how clients' outcome expectations (OE; belief about positive outcome of counseling session) was associated with working alliance and symptom relief longitudinally in a sample of Chinese beginning therapist trainees and their clients. Participants included 204 Chinese therapist trainees and their 1,214 clients who provided data for 11,198 sessions. Before every therapy session after intake, clients reported their symptom severity level and OE; after every session, clients reported their perceived working alliance quality. The latent curve model with structured residuals (Curran et al., 2014) was utilized to disentangle the between-person (average client differences) and within-person (session-by-session fluctuations) effects and test the temporal directionality between the three variables of interest. Results showed that, at the between-person level, clients who began treatment with stronger positive OE tended to form stronger alliances and report lower symptom distress at the beginning of therapy; and clients who sustained or increased their OE during treatment showed greater alliance growth and faster symptom reduction over time. At the within-person level, a cyclical pathway emerged where higher OE before a session temporally led to higher working alliance rating after that session, which subsequently led to higher OE at the next session; however, results did not support the OE → working alliance → symptom mediation model, nor the bidirectional associations between client OE and symptom relief. Practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

信念、联系与缓解:咨客对咨询成功、工作联盟与症状缓解的信念的纵向关联。
本研究以中国初级治疗师培训生及其来访者为样本,纵向考察了来访者的结果期望(OE;对咨询会议积极结果的信念)与工作联盟和症状缓解之间的关系。参与者包括204名中国治疗师培训生和他们的1214名客户,他们提供了11,198次会议的数据。患者在每次治疗前报告其症状严重程度和OE;每次会议结束后,客户都报告了他们对工作联盟质量的感知。使用带有结构化残差的潜在曲线模型(Curran等人,2014)来解开人与人之间(平均客户差异)和人与人之间(会话之间的波动)的影响,并测试三个感兴趣变量之间的时间方向性。结果显示,在人际水平上,开始治疗时OE阳性程度较强的患者倾向于形成更强的联盟,并在治疗开始时报告较低的症状困扰;在治疗期间维持或增加OE的患者随着时间的推移,联盟增长更快,症状减轻更快。在个人层面上,出现了一个循环路径,即会议前较高的OE暂时导致会议后较高的工作联盟评级,随后导致下一次会议时更高的OE;然而,结果不支持OE→工作联盟→症状的中介模型,也不支持客户OE与症状缓解之间的双向关联。讨论了实际意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书