{"title":"Assessment of Test Strips for Detection of Fentanyl in Powders.","authors":"Jessica L Armstrong, Rebekah E Wharton","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01933-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testing drug powders before consumption is a harm reduction measure that could help prevent accidental overdoses. Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to test for fentanyl in powders, but comprehensive, comparative data assessing commercial test strips' performance is currently unavailable. To address this gap, we analyzed drug powders using FTS from three different vendors using the manufacturer's recommended testing procedures. Each FTS was assessed for sensitivity to fentanyl, cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs, and selectivity by testing other relevant compounds. None of the FTS was as sensitive as claimed by the manufacturer nor could they detect all fentanyl analogs tested, which were selected based on their recent prevalence. The drugs responsible for the most false positives were stimulants, hallucinogens, synthetic opioids, and the cutting agent, diphenhydramine. Overall, testing of DanceSafe FTS resulted in the highest sensitivity for fentanyl, the highest selectivity when tested with other substances (fewest false positives), and moderate cross-reactivity with analogs. Testing of BTNX FTS resulted in the highest cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs and moderate sensitivity for fentanyl. These results provide valuable information when selecting FTS for harm reduction as well as understanding the implications of each test's results. While no FTS tested performed as marketed, they still remain valuable as drug checking or screening tools to prevent drug overdose deaths.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"927-936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01933-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Testing drug powders before consumption is a harm reduction measure that could help prevent accidental overdoses. Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to test for fentanyl in powders, but comprehensive, comparative data assessing commercial test strips' performance is currently unavailable. To address this gap, we analyzed drug powders using FTS from three different vendors using the manufacturer's recommended testing procedures. Each FTS was assessed for sensitivity to fentanyl, cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs, and selectivity by testing other relevant compounds. None of the FTS was as sensitive as claimed by the manufacturer nor could they detect all fentanyl analogs tested, which were selected based on their recent prevalence. The drugs responsible for the most false positives were stimulants, hallucinogens, synthetic opioids, and the cutting agent, diphenhydramine. Overall, testing of DanceSafe FTS resulted in the highest sensitivity for fentanyl, the highest selectivity when tested with other substances (fewest false positives), and moderate cross-reactivity with analogs. Testing of BTNX FTS resulted in the highest cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs and moderate sensitivity for fentanyl. These results provide valuable information when selecting FTS for harm reduction as well as understanding the implications of each test's results. While no FTS tested performed as marketed, they still remain valuable as drug checking or screening tools to prevent drug overdose deaths.
期刊介绍:
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.