Assessment of Test Strips for Detection of Fentanyl in Powders.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1007/s11121-026-01933-z
Jessica L Armstrong, Rebekah E Wharton
{"title":"Assessment of Test Strips for Detection of Fentanyl in Powders.","authors":"Jessica L Armstrong, Rebekah E Wharton","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01933-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testing drug powders before consumption is a harm reduction measure that could help prevent accidental overdoses. Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to test for fentanyl in powders, but comprehensive, comparative data assessing commercial test strips' performance is currently unavailable. To address this gap, we analyzed drug powders using FTS from three different vendors using the manufacturer's recommended testing procedures. Each FTS was assessed for sensitivity to fentanyl, cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs, and selectivity by testing other relevant compounds. None of the FTS was as sensitive as claimed by the manufacturer nor could they detect all fentanyl analogs tested, which were selected based on their recent prevalence. The drugs responsible for the most false positives were stimulants, hallucinogens, synthetic opioids, and the cutting agent, diphenhydramine. Overall, testing of DanceSafe FTS resulted in the highest sensitivity for fentanyl, the highest selectivity when tested with other substances (fewest false positives), and moderate cross-reactivity with analogs. Testing of BTNX FTS resulted in the highest cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs and moderate sensitivity for fentanyl. These results provide valuable information when selecting FTS for harm reduction as well as understanding the implications of each test's results. While no FTS tested performed as marketed, they still remain valuable as drug checking or screening tools to prevent drug overdose deaths.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"927-936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01933-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing drug powders before consumption is a harm reduction measure that could help prevent accidental overdoses. Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to test for fentanyl in powders, but comprehensive, comparative data assessing commercial test strips' performance is currently unavailable. To address this gap, we analyzed drug powders using FTS from three different vendors using the manufacturer's recommended testing procedures. Each FTS was assessed for sensitivity to fentanyl, cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs, and selectivity by testing other relevant compounds. None of the FTS was as sensitive as claimed by the manufacturer nor could they detect all fentanyl analogs tested, which were selected based on their recent prevalence. The drugs responsible for the most false positives were stimulants, hallucinogens, synthetic opioids, and the cutting agent, diphenhydramine. Overall, testing of DanceSafe FTS resulted in the highest sensitivity for fentanyl, the highest selectivity when tested with other substances (fewest false positives), and moderate cross-reactivity with analogs. Testing of BTNX FTS resulted in the highest cross-reactivity with fentanyl analogs and moderate sensitivity for fentanyl. These results provide valuable information when selecting FTS for harm reduction as well as understanding the implications of each test's results. While no FTS tested performed as marketed, they still remain valuable as drug checking or screening tools to prevent drug overdose deaths.

粉剂中芬太尼检测试纸的评价。
在服用药粉之前进行检测是一种减少危害的措施,可以帮助防止意外过量服用。芬太尼试纸条(FTS)用于测试粉末中的芬太尼,但目前还没有评估商业试纸条性能的全面、比较数据。为了解决这一差距,我们使用来自三个不同供应商的FTS分析了药粉,并使用了制造商推荐的测试程序。通过检测其他相关化合物,评估每种FTS对芬太尼的敏感性、与芬太尼类似物的交叉反应性以及选择性。没有一个FTS像制造商声称的那样敏感,也不能检测到所有的芬太尼类似物,这些芬太尼类似物是根据它们最近的流行情况选择的。造成假阳性最多的药物是兴奋剂、致幻剂、合成阿片类药物和割伤剂苯海拉明。总体而言,DanceSafe FTS检测对芬太尼的灵敏度最高,与其他物质检测时的选择性最高(假阳性最少),与类似物的交叉反应性中等。BTNX FTS检测结果显示与芬太尼类似物的交叉反应性最高,对芬太尼的敏感性中等。这些结果为选择FTS减少危害以及理解每个测试结果的含义提供了有价值的信息。虽然目前市面上还没有进行FTS测试,但作为药物检查或筛选工具,它们仍然具有预防药物过量死亡的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书