World Wide Silk Web: the Padua sericulture station and the international circulation of techno-entomology (1869-1900).

IF 0.9 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Barbara Di Gennaro Splendore
{"title":"World Wide Silk Web: the Padua sericulture station and the international circulation of techno-entomology (1869-1900).","authors":"Barbara Di Gennaro Splendore","doi":"10.1017/S000708742610199X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the rise and global influence of sericulture experimental stations from 1869 to 1900, framing them as an international 'World Wide Silk Web'. Focusing on the Padua sericulture station as a case study, the essay traces how these stations initially emerged in response to the pébrine epizootic that devastated silk production across Europe and Asia. It argues that the adoption and diffusion of Louis Pasteur's preventive method against pébrine owed less to individual scientific discovery than to the collective work of these stations. Sericulture stations became hubs of techno-entomological knowledge, by blending traditional practices with new methods, creating knowledge commodities, and disseminating technical knowledge. Operating at the intersection of national interests and international collaboration, stations exchanged expertise, materials, knowledge and innovations while supporting local silk industries. In contrast to models of knowledge movements that focus on imperial extraction, this article highlights the asymmetrical yet polycentric nature of this network, shaped by economic partnerships, scientific authority, geopolitical aims and international contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708742610199X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the rise and global influence of sericulture experimental stations from 1869 to 1900, framing them as an international 'World Wide Silk Web'. Focusing on the Padua sericulture station as a case study, the essay traces how these stations initially emerged in response to the pébrine epizootic that devastated silk production across Europe and Asia. It argues that the adoption and diffusion of Louis Pasteur's preventive method against pébrine owed less to individual scientific discovery than to the collective work of these stations. Sericulture stations became hubs of techno-entomological knowledge, by blending traditional practices with new methods, creating knowledge commodities, and disseminating technical knowledge. Operating at the intersection of national interests and international collaboration, stations exchanged expertise, materials, knowledge and innovations while supporting local silk industries. In contrast to models of knowledge movements that focus on imperial extraction, this article highlights the asymmetrical yet polycentric nature of this network, shaped by economic partnerships, scientific authority, geopolitical aims and international contexts.

万维网:帕多瓦养蚕站和国际昆虫学技术流通(1869-1900)。
本文考察了从1869年到1900年蚕桑养殖实验站的兴起和全球影响,将它们构建为一个国际“万维网”。本文以帕多瓦养蚕站为例,追溯了这些养蚕站最初是如何应对摧毁了整个欧洲和亚洲丝绸生产的帕多瓦动物流行病的。它认为,采用和传播路易斯巴斯德的预防方法,以防止psamhiv的个人科学发现,不如归功于这些站点的集体工作。蚕桑站通过将传统做法与新方法相结合、创造知识商品和传播技术知识,成为技术昆虫学知识的中心。站站在国家利益和国际合作的交汇处运作,交换专业知识、材料、知识和创新,同时支持当地的丝绸工业。与关注帝国榨取的知识运动模型相反,本文强调了这个网络的不对称但多中心的本质,它由经济伙伴关系、科学权威、地缘政治目标和国际背景塑造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: This leading international journal publishes scholarly papers and review articles on all aspects of the history of science. History of science is interpreted widely to include medicine, technology and social studies of science. BJHS papers make important and lively contributions to scholarship and the journal has been an essential library resource for more than thirty years. It is also used extensively by historians and scholars in related fields. A substantial book review section is a central feature. There are four issues a year, comprising an annual volume of over 600 pages. Published for the British Society for the History of Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书