Effectiveness of a Specialty-Focused, Outpatient-Based Case Teaching Model in Residency Training for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Wei Li, Hongye Shang, Wentao Zhang, Xiangjin Liu, Jingfeng Zhao
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Specialty-Focused, Outpatient-Based Case Teaching Model in Residency Training for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.","authors":"Wei Li, Hongye Shang, Wentao Zhang, Xiangjin Liu, Jingfeng Zhao","doi":"10.1177/23821205261453755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has become one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide and requires comprehensive clinical management involving risk stratification, longitudinal assessment, and integrated decision-making. Developing residents' clinical reasoning and stratified management competence remains a challenge in traditional residency training, which often relies on fragmented case exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a specialty-focused, outpatient-based case teaching model embedded in a MASLD clinic for residency training. MASLD was used as a representative context of chronic disease management to evaluate a specialty-focused, outpatient-based case teaching model applicable to residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental teaching quality improvement study included 232 residents rotating through a hepatology department between November 2024 and October 2025. Participants were allocated to a traditional teaching group (n = 104) or a specialty clinic-based case teaching group (n = 128) according to rotation arrangements. The intervention integrated authentic outpatient cases with on-site demonstration, structured reflection, and integrated clinical decision-making. Teaching outcomes were assessed across multiple domains, including theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, diagnostic and stratification ability, clinical reasoning, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pattern differentiation, and teaching satisfaction. Group comparisons were performed using independent-sample <i>t</i> tests and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents in the specialty clinic-based teaching group achieved significantly higher scores than those in the traditional group across all continuous outcome measures, including theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, diagnostic and stratification ability, clinical reasoning, TCM pattern differentiation, and teaching satisfaction (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Skill assessment pass rates and the proportion of residents achieving an overall performance rating of \"good or above\" were also significantly higher in the specialty group. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between undergraduate and postgraduate residents within the traditional group. In contrast, within the specialty teaching group, postgraduate residents demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic and stratification scores than undergraduate residents (<i>P</i> = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that a specialty-focused, outpatient-based case teaching model embedded within a MASLD clinic may improve residents' clinical competence and learning satisfaction compared with traditional teaching approaches. It may also support stratified training and serve as a practical complement to residency education in chronic disease management settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"13 ","pages":"23821205261453755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205261453755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has become one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide and requires comprehensive clinical management involving risk stratification, longitudinal assessment, and integrated decision-making. Developing residents' clinical reasoning and stratified management competence remains a challenge in traditional residency training, which often relies on fragmented case exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a specialty-focused, outpatient-based case teaching model embedded in a MASLD clinic for residency training. MASLD was used as a representative context of chronic disease management to evaluate a specialty-focused, outpatient-based case teaching model applicable to residency training.

Methods: This quasi-experimental teaching quality improvement study included 232 residents rotating through a hepatology department between November 2024 and October 2025. Participants were allocated to a traditional teaching group (n = 104) or a specialty clinic-based case teaching group (n = 128) according to rotation arrangements. The intervention integrated authentic outpatient cases with on-site demonstration, structured reflection, and integrated clinical decision-making. Teaching outcomes were assessed across multiple domains, including theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, diagnostic and stratification ability, clinical reasoning, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pattern differentiation, and teaching satisfaction. Group comparisons were performed using independent-sample t tests and chi-square tests.

Results: Residents in the specialty clinic-based teaching group achieved significantly higher scores than those in the traditional group across all continuous outcome measures, including theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, diagnostic and stratification ability, clinical reasoning, TCM pattern differentiation, and teaching satisfaction (all P < 0.001). Skill assessment pass rates and the proportion of residents achieving an overall performance rating of "good or above" were also significantly higher in the specialty group. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between undergraduate and postgraduate residents within the traditional group. In contrast, within the specialty teaching group, postgraduate residents demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic and stratification scores than undergraduate residents (P = 0.030).

Conclusions: This study suggests that a specialty-focused, outpatient-based case teaching model embedded within a MASLD clinic may improve residents' clinical competence and learning satisfaction compared with traditional teaching approaches. It may also support stratified training and serve as a practical complement to residency education in chronic disease management settings.

以专科为中心、门诊为基础的案例教学模式在代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝住院医师培训中的有效性
背景:代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)已成为世界范围内最常见的慢性肝病之一,需要包括风险分层、纵向评估和综合决策在内的综合临床管理。发展住院医师的临床推理和分层管理能力仍然是传统住院医师培训的挑战,这种培训往往依赖于零散的病例暴露。本研究旨在评估以专科为中心、门诊为基础的案例教学模式在MASLD诊所住院医师培训中的有效性。MASLD被用作慢性病管理的代表性背景,以评估适用于住院医师培训的以专科为重点、门诊为基础的案例教学模式。方法:这项准实验教学质量改进研究纳入了2024年11月至2025年10月在肝病科轮转的232名住院医师。根据轮换安排,参与者被分配到传统教学组(n = 104)或专科临床案例教学组(n = 128)。干预将真实门诊病例与现场演示、结构化反思、临床一体化决策相结合。从理论知识、临床技能、诊断分层能力、临床推理能力、中医辨证论治能力、教学满意度等多个方面评价教学效果。采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验进行组间比较。结果:专科临床教学组住院医师在理论知识、临床技能、诊断分层能力、临床推理、中医辨证、教学满意度等各项连续指标得分均显著高于传统组(P均< 0.001)。技能评估通过率和获得“良好或以上”整体表现评级的住院医生比例在专业组也显着更高。亚组分析显示,在传统组中,本科生和研究生之间没有显著差异。相比之下,在专业教学组内,研究生住院医师的诊断和分层得分显著高于本科住院医师(P = 0.030)。结论:本研究提示,与传统的教学方法相比,在MASLD诊所内嵌入以专科为中心、门诊为基础的案例教学模式,可以提高住院医师的临床能力和学习满意度。它还可以支持分层培训,并作为慢性病管理环境中住院医师教育的实际补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书