Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective.

IF 5.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alice Tompson, James Thomas, Harry Rutter, Laurence Blanchard, Éadaoin Cott, Rebecca E Glover, Cecile Knai, Nason Maani, May C I van Schalkwyk, Vivian Welch, Mark Petticrew
{"title":"Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective.","authors":"Alice Tompson, James Thomas, Harry Rutter, Laurence Blanchard, Éadaoin Cott, Rebecca E Glover, Cecile Knai, Nason Maani, May C I van Schalkwyk, Vivian Welch, Mark Petticrew","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03187-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH) are the systems, practices, and pathways through which commercial actors drive health and equity. This includes their influence on systems of evidence production and dissemination (evidence ecosystems) in order to protect and promote commercial interests. In the Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES) methodological guidance, we provided advice for conducing CDoH relevant evidence syntheses, from developing a protocol to reporting the review and planning an update. This follow-up paper considers reasons and practical implications for integrating a complex systems perspective in such reviews. This commentary describes how a complex systems perspective can benefit research, including evidence synthesis related to the CDoH, by embracing the complexity of the real world, understanding interventions in context, rendering visible the corporate playbook, and exposing the power dynamics that drive inequity. We then reflect on the practical implications of adopting a complex systems approach in CDoH evidence synthesis, including drawing on a systems lens and/or incorporating specific systems methods in the review. This commentary complements existing CODES guidance in highlighting considerations for conducting CDoH relevant evidence synthesis from a complex systems perspective. It can help interpreting such reviews and raise awareness of how commercial actors can shape evidence ecosystems, particularly evidence synthesis. Having a robust evidence base that considers systems elements and dynamics will support effective action to address the CDoH, improve public health and reduce inequity at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03187-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH) are the systems, practices, and pathways through which commercial actors drive health and equity. This includes their influence on systems of evidence production and dissemination (evidence ecosystems) in order to protect and promote commercial interests. In the Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES) methodological guidance, we provided advice for conducing CDoH relevant evidence syntheses, from developing a protocol to reporting the review and planning an update. This follow-up paper considers reasons and practical implications for integrating a complex systems perspective in such reviews. This commentary describes how a complex systems perspective can benefit research, including evidence synthesis related to the CDoH, by embracing the complexity of the real world, understanding interventions in context, rendering visible the corporate playbook, and exposing the power dynamics that drive inequity. We then reflect on the practical implications of adopting a complex systems approach in CDoH evidence synthesis, including drawing on a systems lens and/or incorporating specific systems methods in the review. This commentary complements existing CODES guidance in highlighting considerations for conducting CDoH relevant evidence synthesis from a complex systems perspective. It can help interpreting such reviews and raise awareness of how commercial actors can shape evidence ecosystems, particularly evidence synthesis. Having a robust evidence base that considers systems elements and dynamics will support effective action to address the CDoH, improve public health and reduce inequity at scale.

审查证据生态系统:从复杂系统的角度综合关于健康商业决定因素的证据。
健康的商业决定因素(CDoH)是商业行为者推动健康和公平的系统、做法和途径。这包括它们对证据生产和传播系统(证据生态系统)的影响,以保护和促进商业利益。在《健康的商业决定因素和证据综合(CODES)》方法学指南中,我们提供了从制定方案到报告审查和规划更新的建议,用于开展与卫生与健康相关的证据综合。这篇后续的论文考虑了在这样的评论中整合复杂系统观点的原因和实际意义。本评论描述了复杂系统视角如何通过拥抱现实世界的复杂性,理解背景下的干预措施,使企业剧本可见,并揭示导致不平等的权力动态,从而有利于研究,包括与CDoH相关的证据综合。然后,我们反思了在CDoH证据合成中采用复杂系统方法的实际意义,包括借鉴系统视角和/或在综述中纳入特定的系统方法。本评注补充了现有的《守则》指南,强调了从复杂系统角度进行CDoH相关证据综合的考虑。它可以帮助解释这些评论,并提高对商业行为者如何塑造证据生态系统,特别是证据综合的认识。拥有考虑系统要素和动态的强大证据基础,将有助于采取有效行动,解决儿童健康问题,改善公共卫生,并大规模减少不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书