Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, and healthcare utilization, among patients with cancer (lung, breast, and pancreas) and cardiovascular diseases (HF, AF, hypertensive, and chronic ischemic heart disease) in Germany: two systematic reviews.

IF 5.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Janine Ropeter, Nina Overhageböck, Maren Dreier, Dörthe Meyerdierks, Adil Imran, Torben Heinsohn, Maren Steinmann, Alexander Kuhlmann, Beate Jahn, Berit Lange, Carolina J Klett-Tammen, Manuela Harries
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, and healthcare utilization, among patients with cancer (lung, breast, and pancreas) and cardiovascular diseases (HF, AF, hypertensive, and chronic ischemic heart disease) in Germany: two systematic reviews.","authors":"Janine Ropeter, Nina Overhageböck, Maren Dreier, Dörthe Meyerdierks, Adil Imran, Torben Heinsohn, Maren Steinmann, Alexander Kuhlmann, Beate Jahn, Berit Lange, Carolina J Klett-Tammen, Manuela Harries","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03192-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) (e.g., lockdowns and contact restrictions) disrupted routine healthcare delivery. In Germany, these measures affected diagnostic and treatment services for people with cancer and cardiovascular diseases, potentially delaying diagnosis and adversely influencing outcomes. We assessed whether and to what extent diagnosis, health utilization and health outcome among patients with selected cancer and cardiovascular conditions changed in Germany during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two systematic reviews of studies from Germany on selected cancers (breast, lung and pancreatic) and cardiovascular conditions (atrial fibrillation/flutter, heart failure, hypertensive and chronic ischemic heart disease). Protocols were registered in PROSPERO and the reviews were reported in accordance with PRISMA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase and screened grey literature. Outcomes included changes in new diagnoses, healthcare utilization, treatment, and disease-specific mortality during the pandemic (2020-2023) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using an adapted ROBINS-E tool. Owing to heterogeneity, we synthesized findings narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 1991 records for cancer and 4,981 records for cardiovascular diseases, and included 9 cancer studies and 10 cardiovascular studies. For cancer, several studies reported a relative reduction in new breast and lung cancer diagnoses of up to 25% during lockdown periods; hospital admissions decreased by up to 9%. For cardiovascular conditions, hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation/flutter and heart failure decreased by up to 20%, particularly during pandemic peaks. Evidence on treatment delays, changes in treatment, and mortality was limited, and outcomes for other included diagnoses were often not reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The available evidence indicates substantial reductions in hospital admissions and new diagnoses among patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease in Germany during the pandemic, suggesting major disruptions to care delivery. However, heterogeneity and gaps in the evidence base limit a comprehensive assessment of downstream outcomes. More comprehensive, linked data and further research are needed to quantify the full pandemic's impact and to strengthen health-system resilience for future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13196194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03192-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) (e.g., lockdowns and contact restrictions) disrupted routine healthcare delivery. In Germany, these measures affected diagnostic and treatment services for people with cancer and cardiovascular diseases, potentially delaying diagnosis and adversely influencing outcomes. We assessed whether and to what extent diagnosis, health utilization and health outcome among patients with selected cancer and cardiovascular conditions changed in Germany during the pandemic.

Methods: We conducted two systematic reviews of studies from Germany on selected cancers (breast, lung and pancreatic) and cardiovascular conditions (atrial fibrillation/flutter, heart failure, hypertensive and chronic ischemic heart disease). Protocols were registered in PROSPERO and the reviews were reported in accordance with PRISMA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase and screened grey literature. Outcomes included changes in new diagnoses, healthcare utilization, treatment, and disease-specific mortality during the pandemic (2020-2023) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using an adapted ROBINS-E tool. Owing to heterogeneity, we synthesized findings narratively.

Results: We screened 1991 records for cancer and 4,981 records for cardiovascular diseases, and included 9 cancer studies and 10 cardiovascular studies. For cancer, several studies reported a relative reduction in new breast and lung cancer diagnoses of up to 25% during lockdown periods; hospital admissions decreased by up to 9%. For cardiovascular conditions, hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation/flutter and heart failure decreased by up to 20%, particularly during pandemic peaks. Evidence on treatment delays, changes in treatment, and mortality was limited, and outcomes for other included diagnoses were often not reported.

Discussion: The available evidence indicates substantial reductions in hospital admissions and new diagnoses among patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease in Germany during the pandemic, suggesting major disruptions to care delivery. However, heterogeneity and gaps in the evidence base limit a comprehensive assessment of downstream outcomes. More comprehensive, linked data and further research are needed to quantify the full pandemic's impact and to strengthen health-system resilience for future crises.

COVID-19大流行对德国癌症(肺、乳腺和胰腺)和心血管疾病(心衰、房颤、高血压和慢性缺血性心脏病)患者诊断和医疗保健利用的影响:两项系统综述
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行和相关的非药物干预措施(npi)(如封锁和接触限制)扰乱了常规医疗服务。在德国,这些措施影响了癌症和心血管疾病患者的诊断和治疗服务,可能会延迟诊断并对结果产生不利影响。我们评估了在大流行期间,德国选定的癌症和心血管疾病患者的诊断、健康利用和健康结果是否发生了变化,以及在多大程度上发生了变化。方法:我们对德国选定的癌症(乳腺癌、肺癌和胰腺癌)和心血管疾病(心房颤动/扑动、心力衰竭、高血压和慢性缺血性心脏病)的研究进行了两项系统综述。议定书已在PROSPERO登记,并根据PRISMA报告了审查情况。我们检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Embase,筛选灰色文献。结果包括大流行期间(2020-2023年)与大流行前(2018-2019年)相比,新诊断、医疗保健利用、治疗和疾病特异性死亡率的变化。两名审稿人独立筛选记录,提取数据,并使用改编的ROBINS-E工具评估偏倚风险。由于异质性,我们以叙述的方式综合研究结果。结果:我们筛选了1991项癌症记录和4981项心血管疾病记录,包括9项癌症研究和10项心血管研究。在癌症方面,几项研究报告称,在封锁期间,乳腺癌和肺癌的新诊断率相对降低了25%;入院人数最多减少了9%。对于心血管疾病,因心房颤动/扑动和心力衰竭住院的人数减少了20%,特别是在大流行高峰期间。关于治疗延误、治疗改变和死亡率的证据有限,其他纳入诊断的结果往往没有报告。讨论:现有证据表明,在大流行期间,德国癌症和心血管疾病患者的住院人数和新诊断人数大幅减少,这表明护理服务受到重大干扰。然而,证据基础的异质性和差距限制了对下游结果的全面评估。需要更全面、更相关的数据和进一步的研究来量化大流行的全面影响,并加强卫生系统对未来危机的抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书