Development and validation of a protective factor-based rehabilitation resilience nursing intervention for stroke survivors.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lian-Huan Cai, Xiao-Fang Wang, Hui Chen, Yang-Yang Mei, Min-Fang Ding, Yan Zhuo, Li-Qun Yao
{"title":"Development and validation of a protective factor-based rehabilitation resilience nursing intervention for stroke survivors.","authors":"Lian-Huan Cai, Xiao-Fang Wang, Hui Chen, Yang-Yang Mei, Min-Fang Ding, Yan Zhuo, Li-Qun Yao","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2026.2677636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and content-validate a protective factor - based nursing intervention aimed at enhancing rehabilitation resilience in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was guided by the Medical Research Council Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions (the MRC framework). Focusing on the development phase (Phase I), we systematically integrated existing evidence, theoretical models, and clinical guidelines to construct a structured intervention protocol targeting rehabilitation resilience. A two-round Delphi process was conducted to evaluate content validity, with the Content Validity Index (CVI), coefficient of variation (CV), and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) used to assess expert consensus and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen experts participated in the Delphi process, demonstrating high engagement and authority (authority coefficient = 0.875). Consensus improved across rounds, with CV values decreasing (0-0.29 to 0-0.20) and Kendall's W increasing (0.276 to 0.519). All intervention items achieved excellent content validity (I-CVI = 1.00; S-CVI = 1.00). The finalized intervention protocol is structured across four rehabilitation phases: early rehabilitation, mid-stage rehabilitation, late rehabilitation, and discharge planning, with each phase targeting key protective factors to enhance resilience.Conclusion: A theoretically grounded and evidence-informed rehabilitation resilience nursing intervention was successfully developed and validated. The protocol demonstrates strong content validity, clinical relevance, and feasibility, providing a robust foundation for subsequent feasibility testing and randomized controlled trials. This work addresses a critical gap in the literature by offering a transparent and systematic description of intervention development for resilience-based stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2026.2677636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and content-validate a protective factor - based nursing intervention aimed at enhancing rehabilitation resilience in stroke survivors.

Materials and methods: This study was guided by the Medical Research Council Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions (the MRC framework). Focusing on the development phase (Phase I), we systematically integrated existing evidence, theoretical models, and clinical guidelines to construct a structured intervention protocol targeting rehabilitation resilience. A two-round Delphi process was conducted to evaluate content validity, with the Content Validity Index (CVI), coefficient of variation (CV), and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) used to assess expert consensus and reliability.

Results: Sixteen experts participated in the Delphi process, demonstrating high engagement and authority (authority coefficient = 0.875). Consensus improved across rounds, with CV values decreasing (0-0.29 to 0-0.20) and Kendall's W increasing (0.276 to 0.519). All intervention items achieved excellent content validity (I-CVI = 1.00; S-CVI = 1.00). The finalized intervention protocol is structured across four rehabilitation phases: early rehabilitation, mid-stage rehabilitation, late rehabilitation, and discharge planning, with each phase targeting key protective factors to enhance resilience.Conclusion: A theoretically grounded and evidence-informed rehabilitation resilience nursing intervention was successfully developed and validated. The protocol demonstrates strong content validity, clinical relevance, and feasibility, providing a robust foundation for subsequent feasibility testing and randomized controlled trials. This work addresses a critical gap in the literature by offering a transparent and systematic description of intervention development for resilience-based stroke rehabilitation.

基于保护因子的脑卒中幸存者康复弹性护理干预的开发与验证。
目的:建立并验证一种基于保护因子的护理干预,旨在提高脑卒中幸存者的康复弹性。材料和方法:本研究遵循医学研究委员会制定和评估复杂干预措施框架(MRC框架)。本研究以发展阶段(第一阶段)为重点,系统整合现有证据、理论模型和临床指南,构建以康复弹性为目标的结构化干预方案。采用两轮德尔菲法评估内容效度,采用内容效度指数(CVI)、变异系数(CV)和肯德尔一致性系数(W)评估专家共识度和信度。结果:16位专家参与了德尔菲过程,具有较高的参与度和权威性(权威系数= 0.875)。各轮的共识有所改善,CV值下降(0-0.29至0-0.20),Kendall's W增加(0.276至0.519)。所有干预项目均达到极好的内容效度(I-CVI = 1.00; S-CVI = 1.00)。最终的干预方案分为四个康复阶段:早期康复、中期康复、晚期康复和出院计划,每个阶段都针对关键的保护因素,以增强复原力。结论:一种基于理论和循证的康复弹性护理干预方法被成功地开发和验证。该方案具有较强的内容效度、临床相关性和可行性,为后续的可行性测试和随机对照试验提供了坚实的基础。这项工作通过为基于弹性的中风康复提供透明和系统的干预发展描述,解决了文献中的一个关键空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书