Bronchodilator effect of Aerochamber and Inspirease in comparison with metered dose inhaler.

N Crimi, F Palermo, B Cacopardo, C Vancheri, R Oliveri, B Palermo, A Mistretta
{"title":"Bronchodilator effect of Aerochamber and Inspirease in comparison with metered dose inhaler.","authors":"N Crimi,&nbsp;F Palermo,&nbsp;B Cacopardo,&nbsp;C Vancheri,&nbsp;R Oliveri,&nbsp;B Palermo,&nbsp;A Mistretta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This trial was performed in a randomized double-blind manner on four different days in 13 asthmatic patients in order to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of two different inhalation devices, Inspirease (IP) and Aerochamber (AC), to the conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI). The results showed that clenbuterol determined a significant FEV1 increase inhaled either via MDI or via IP and AC. IP caused a greater bronchodilatation than AC, 30 min after clenbuterol administration. IP caused a greater mean increase (P less than 0.05) in FEV1 than the MDI at all time intervals; AC provided an improvement in bronchodilator response over directly administered MDI. Such responses are only marginally clinically relevant when patients use MDI correctly. These devices are mainly indicated in patients with poor hand-lung coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":12053,"journal":{"name":"European journal of respiratory diseases","volume":"71 3","pages":"153-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of respiratory diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This trial was performed in a randomized double-blind manner on four different days in 13 asthmatic patients in order to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of two different inhalation devices, Inspirease (IP) and Aerochamber (AC), to the conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI). The results showed that clenbuterol determined a significant FEV1 increase inhaled either via MDI or via IP and AC. IP caused a greater bronchodilatation than AC, 30 min after clenbuterol administration. IP caused a greater mean increase (P less than 0.05) in FEV1 than the MDI at all time intervals; AC provided an improvement in bronchodilator response over directly administered MDI. Such responses are only marginally clinically relevant when patients use MDI correctly. These devices are mainly indicated in patients with poor hand-lung coordination.

气室和吸气器与计量吸入器的支气管扩张作用比较。
为了比较inspirase (IP)和Aerochamber (AC)两种不同吸入装置与传统计量吸入器(MDI)的支气管扩张效果,本试验采用随机双盲方法,分4天对13例哮喘患者进行了研究。结果表明,克仑特罗通过MDI或通过IP和AC吸入的FEV1显著增加,在给药30 min后,IP比AC引起更大的支气管扩张。在所有时间间隔内,IP组FEV1的平均升高幅度均大于MDI组(P < 0.05);与直接使用MDI相比,AC改善了支气管扩张剂的反应。当患者正确使用MDI时,这些反应仅与临床无关。这些装置主要适用于手肺协调性差的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信