Uncovering the hidden mutational landscape of the oral epithelium

IF 2.9 Q3 Dentistry
Manas Dave
{"title":"Uncovering the hidden mutational landscape of the oral epithelium","authors":"Manas Dave","doi":"10.1038/s41432-026-01224-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lawson ARJ, et al. Somatic mutation and selection at the population scale. Nature. 2025;647(8089):411–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09584-w . A cross-sectional observational cohort study using advanced genomic sequencing to map somatic mutations and clonal selection in normal human tissues at the population level1. The authors used targeted NanoSeq, a duplex sequencing method achieving exceptionally low error rates (fewer than five errors per billion base pairs). The technique was applied to targeted capture of a 239-gene panel (0.9 Mb) in 1042 non-invasive buccal swab samples (median donor age 68 years, 79% female, 37% smokers) and 371 blood samples from the TwinsUK registry. Mutation calling required strict duplex consensus filters. Gene-level selection was quantified using dNdScv, while site-level dN/dS analyses were used to identify recurrent hotspots and selected sites. Mutational signatures were deconvolved with sigfit, and multivariate mixed-effects regression modelled associations with age, smoking (pack-years), alcohol (drink-years), missing teeth, and other covariates. In the oral epithelium, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) accumulated at 18.0 per cell per year and indels (insertions or deletions in the genome) at 2.0 per cell per year. Across all 1,042 participants, the authors detected 341,682 somatic mutations, including approximately 62,000 estimated driver mutations across 46 positively selected genes (e.g., NOTCH1 mutant cells reaching approximately 10% by ages 65–85 years, TP53 ~ 3%). Nine genes showed negative selection. Two dominant mutational signatures emerged: a clock-like signature A (resembling SBS1 and SBS5) and an alcohol associated signature B (resembling SBS16). The authors reported that smoking and alcohol were associated with higher mutation burdens, and that some effects on clonal selection were inferred from regression analyses; missing teeth (a marker of poor oral health) were independently associated with higher overall driver density. Driver frequencies for NOTCH1 were similar in normal epithelium and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), whereas TP53 was enriched in cancer. The authors concluded that optimised NanoSeq enables population-scale mutational epidemiology in polyclonal tissues, revealing an extraordinarily rich landscape of positive and negative selection in normal oral epithelium. Environmental exposures shape mutagenesis and may also influence clonal selection, supporting a plausible mechanistic link between smoking, alcohol, and oral cancer risk.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"27 3","pages":"49-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-026-01224-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-026-01224-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lawson ARJ, et al. Somatic mutation and selection at the population scale. Nature. 2025;647(8089):411–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09584-w . A cross-sectional observational cohort study using advanced genomic sequencing to map somatic mutations and clonal selection in normal human tissues at the population level1. The authors used targeted NanoSeq, a duplex sequencing method achieving exceptionally low error rates (fewer than five errors per billion base pairs). The technique was applied to targeted capture of a 239-gene panel (0.9 Mb) in 1042 non-invasive buccal swab samples (median donor age 68 years, 79% female, 37% smokers) and 371 blood samples from the TwinsUK registry. Mutation calling required strict duplex consensus filters. Gene-level selection was quantified using dNdScv, while site-level dN/dS analyses were used to identify recurrent hotspots and selected sites. Mutational signatures were deconvolved with sigfit, and multivariate mixed-effects regression modelled associations with age, smoking (pack-years), alcohol (drink-years), missing teeth, and other covariates. In the oral epithelium, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) accumulated at 18.0 per cell per year and indels (insertions or deletions in the genome) at 2.0 per cell per year. Across all 1,042 participants, the authors detected 341,682 somatic mutations, including approximately 62,000 estimated driver mutations across 46 positively selected genes (e.g., NOTCH1 mutant cells reaching approximately 10% by ages 65–85 years, TP53 ~ 3%). Nine genes showed negative selection. Two dominant mutational signatures emerged: a clock-like signature A (resembling SBS1 and SBS5) and an alcohol associated signature B (resembling SBS16). The authors reported that smoking and alcohol were associated with higher mutation burdens, and that some effects on clonal selection were inferred from regression analyses; missing teeth (a marker of poor oral health) were independently associated with higher overall driver density. Driver frequencies for NOTCH1 were similar in normal epithelium and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), whereas TP53 was enriched in cancer. The authors concluded that optimised NanoSeq enables population-scale mutational epidemiology in polyclonal tissues, revealing an extraordinarily rich landscape of positive and negative selection in normal oral epithelium. Environmental exposures shape mutagenesis and may also influence clonal selection, supporting a plausible mechanistic link between smoking, alcohol, and oral cancer risk.
揭示口腔上皮隐藏的突变景观。
评论:Lawson ARJ等。群体尺度上的体细胞突变与选择。自然。2025;647(8089):411 - 420。https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586 - 025 - 09584 - w。设计:一项横断面观察队列研究,利用先进的基因组测序技术在群体水平上绘制正常人类组织的体细胞突变和克隆选择1。参与者:作者使用靶向NanoSeq,这是一种双工测序方法,错误率极低(每十亿碱基对少于5个错误)。该技术应用于1042份非侵入性口腔拭子样本(中位供者年龄68岁,79%为女性,37%为吸烟者)和371份TwinsUK登记处的血液样本中,靶向捕获239个基因面板(0.9 Mb)。数据分析:突变调用需要严格的双工共识过滤器。使用dNdScv定量分析基因水平的选择,而使用位点水平的dN/dS分析来确定复发热点和选定位点。用sigfit对突变特征进行反卷积,多变量混合效应回归模拟了与年龄、吸烟(包年)、饮酒(饮酒年)、缺牙和其他协变量的关联。结果:在口腔上皮中,单核苷酸变异(snv)以每年每个细胞18.0个的速度积累,索引(基因组中的插入或缺失)以每年每个细胞2.0个的速度积累。在所有1,042名参与者中,作者检测到341,682个体细胞突变,包括46个正选择基因中约62,000个估计的驱动突变(例如,NOTCH1突变细胞在65-85岁时达到约10%,TP53约3%)。9个基因表现为负选择。出现了两个主要的突变特征:类似时钟的特征a(类似于SBS1和SBS5)和与酒精相关的特征B(类似于SBS16)。作者报告说,吸烟和酒精与较高的突变负担相关,并且从回归分析中推断出对克隆选择的一些影响;缺牙(口腔健康状况不佳的标志)与较高的总体驾驶员密度独立相关。NOTCH1的驱动频率在正常上皮和头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)中相似,而TP53在癌症中富集。结论:作者得出结论,优化的NanoSeq能够在多克隆组织中实现群体规模的突变流行病学,揭示了正常口腔上皮中异常丰富的阳性和阴性选择景观。环境暴露影响突变,也可能影响克隆选择,支持吸烟、酒精和口腔癌风险之间的合理机制联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书